Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Funtatlaguy

(10,885 posts)
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 05:37 PM Mar 2019

What happened to the "tip of the iceberg" scenario.

For months, we’ve heard media members and pundits say that whatever the media and public knows pales in comparison to what Mueller knows.
People like Malcolm Nance and David Corn told us just to be patient that Mueller had at least obstruction and probably much more on Trump.
So, either they were wrong or Mueller buried it or Barr buried it.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What happened to the "tip of the iceberg" scenario. (Original Post) Funtatlaguy Mar 2019 OP
Mueller clearly had obstruction but left it to Barr as a courtesy budkin Mar 2019 #1
That's not supported by the letter FBaggins Mar 2019 #2
It just smells that way to me budkin Mar 2019 #3
He "makes the call" that there was no underlying crime FBaggins Mar 2019 #4

FBaggins

(26,756 posts)
4. He "makes the call" that there was no underlying crime
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 05:46 PM
Mar 2019

It's incredibly unlikely that anyone could prosecute for obstruction absent that.

Most people misunderstand what "obstruction of justice" actually is. They just assume that they know what a "just" outcome would be... and think that anything keeping that from happening must be obstruction.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What happened to the "tip...