Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

misanthrope

(7,421 posts)
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 05:13 PM Mar 2019

If you're shocked by Mueller's report, you aren't familiar with crime and the legal system

People get away with crime EVERY DAY in the United States. Every. Day.

Often, the more elaborate or lucrative the crime then the more likely they are to do so. Organized criminal networks do things all the time that they're never prosecuted for because they know how to intimidate, obscure and insulate. It's also obvious from his behavior and language that Donald Trump admires and seeks to emulate many of those same figures.

This nation has never been completely just, fair or innocent but it's taken a huge step backward now. The way this will empower and amp up the worst aspects of the United States is going to be disastrous.

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you're shocked by Mueller's report, you aren't familiar with crime and the legal system (Original Post) misanthrope Mar 2019 OP
I'm more shocked by Mueller deciding not to make a "difficult" decision. He wasn't in place just to uponit7771 Mar 2019 #1
He can only do what evidence justifies misanthrope Mar 2019 #2
If he didn't claim in his report that he felt he couldn't make a determination on collusion... Drunken Irishman Mar 2019 #3
Then he should've made a decision on the evidence and decided not to cause it was too "difficult". uponit7771 Mar 2019 #4
Maybe there was only circumstantial evidence, not direct misanthrope Mar 2019 #7
Then he can say that he was innocent of that, to NOT make a decison on OoJ is punk imho uponit7771 Mar 2019 #9
I'm talking about obstruction of justice uponit7771 Mar 2019 #5
... but the system will try to practically throw a kid in jail for life for having a little pot. n/t RKP5637 Mar 2019 #6
Well, that depends on who the kid's parents are misanthrope Mar 2019 #8
Many more criminals "get away with it" than get convicted, or even charged SuprstitionAintthWay Mar 2019 #10
Well put**nm misanthrope Mar 2019 #24
I like to read books about the mafia DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2019 #11
I'm shocked that any DUer refers to Barr's letter as the Mueller report. pnwmom Mar 2019 #12
I don't think that's really an issue on this particular topic. Unless SuprstitionAintthWay Mar 2019 #13
You are totally incorrect. nt greyl Mar 2019 #14
Brilliantly argued rebuttal. SuprstitionAintthWay Mar 2019 #18
The assumption in the headline is the problem. nt greyl Mar 2019 #19
I think Barr did some very clever legal crafting in that letter to make people who aren't lawyers pnwmom Mar 2019 #16
Barr's letter also addressed not at all the aspect of Mueller's mandate SuprstitionAintthWay Mar 2019 #20
So you get it. Barr made numerous lies by omission. We need to read the full Mueller report. nt pnwmom Mar 2019 #21
You're also magically from another dimension where the report has been released to public, greyl Mar 2019 #15
Then allow me to re-phrase misanthrope Mar 2019 #22
Haven't seen it yet nor heard from anyone except Trump's lackeys about it. triron Mar 2019 #17
So you think Mueller is recommending indictments and has the clear evidence to back them up misanthrope Mar 2019 #23

uponit7771

(90,353 posts)
1. I'm more shocked by Mueller deciding not to make a "difficult" decision. He wasn't in place just to
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 05:15 PM
Mar 2019

... make easy decisions.

misanthrope

(7,421 posts)
2. He can only do what evidence justifies
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 05:16 PM
Mar 2019

Not hunches or suspicions but evidence. There was so much obfuscation, the waters were too muddy.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
3. If he didn't claim in his report that he felt he couldn't make a determination on collusion...
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 05:17 PM
Mar 2019

...because Trump was obstructing and obfuscating, then we're boned here.

But indication is there that there wasn't enough evidence.

misanthrope

(7,421 posts)
7. Maybe there was only circumstantial evidence, not direct
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 05:22 PM
Mar 2019

I've seen a public official get away with actual murder -- literal, not figurative -- when they were surrounded by a cloud of circumstantial evidence but nothing direct enough. That included statements by the deceased that weren't allowed in court because she wasn't available for cross examination. Everyone "knew" the guy was guilty but it wouldn't stand up in court.

misanthrope

(7,421 posts)
8. Well, that depends on who the kid's parents are
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 05:23 PM
Mar 2019

If you're a U.S. Senator's son, then even a block of hash might not be enough to have you see jail time. I've seen that one happen, too.

10. Many more criminals "get away with it" than get convicted, or even charged
Mon Mar 25, 2019, 06:02 PM
Mar 2019

in the U.S. It's because were a free society, in which people have civil rights and liberties. And some other, worse reasons as well. But mostly it's because there are real limits to police powers here. We have strict rules of evidence, and an extremely high standard of proof for criminal conviction: "beyond a reasonable doubt."

Law enforcement in America fails at a prodigious rate, but some sort of high failure rate is pretty much baked into our system. If you want the highest rates of crimes solved and crimimals charged you have to move to an authoritarian nation, of which there are plenty to choose from (but you'll be trading one problem for a whole lot of others).

Even for the crime we put the most law enforcement focus on, murder, in America somebody gets arrested only about half the time. Our national murder clearance rate was 59% in 2016 and 61% in 2017... among the lowest in the world. "Clearance" meaning the murderer was arrested, or else identified but couldn't be arrested. Of the latter group, some are already dead themselves, but for others, the police depts' "exceptional clearances," the murderer is known, but the evidence is insufficient for arrest. (Also, some depts. have been known to inflate their clearance rates, "The Wire"- style, by allowing a few unsolved cases to be mis-attributed to somebody already dead or incarcerated. Rare, but it happens.) So, all told, if you're murdered in America, it's about a 50-50 proposition that law enforcement is going to charge somebody for it.

Again, that's for our most aggressively enforced crime.

Now consider burglary or robbery. Arrest rates are much worse. Consider rape. The majority are acquaintance, date, or domestic abuse rapes; the great majority of all rapes aren't even reported. The % of rapes for which someone gets charged is tiny.

How about financial crimes? For well-off bad guys, law enforcement is more abysmal still. How many insider trading financial crimes do we think actually occur for every one in which someone gets indicted? A 5000-to-1 ratio wouldn't surprise me.

In short, the vast majority of crimes committed in America go unpunished. We're just a very goddamned free country, and in practical terms that extends to freedom from arrest for by far the majority of the crimes that Americans commit.

Mueller's team's inability to prove conspiracy between Trump & Co. and Putin's govt should be no surprise at all, to anyone. I remain convinced that considerable communication did go on, through intermediaries if nothing else, between the Kremlin and Trump's astonishingly incompetent clown show of a campaign. So it's disappointing no one's going to jail, or getting evicted from the White House, for it. But that result is completely in keeping with our nation's track record in criminal justice.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
11. I like to read books about the mafia
Mon Mar 25, 2019, 06:04 PM
Mar 2019

So many kingpins led lives of crime with nary a conviction or convictions for minor offenses.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
12. I'm shocked that any DUer refers to Barr's letter as the Mueller report.
Mon Mar 25, 2019, 06:07 PM
Mar 2019

No one here has read Mueller's report, so can we please stop posting as if we have?

13. I don't think that's really an issue on this particular topic. Unless
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:11 AM
Mar 2019

you think Barr out-and-out bald-faced lied when he wrote that Mueller reported he has no more indictments forthcoming, and there are no sealed indictments either.

18. Brilliantly argued rebuttal.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:55 AM
Mar 2019

Okay, let me restate misanthrope's point in a way maybe more acceptable to those scouring the forum to police Mueller v Barr nomenclature.

WHEN YOU DO GET TO READ Mueller's report, and it says no more indictments are coming from his investigation and there are no sealed indictments, anyone shocked THEN, by that, doesn't understand well the American criminal justice system. Because our system lets criminals get away with their crimes much, much more often than it successfully holds them accountable. It's designed so as to err, pretty heavily, on the side of the perp rather than the state. Trump slithering free of conspiracy-or-coordination prosecution, even if he's guilty (which I continue to believe he is) is very much the norm rather than the exception in the American criminal justice system.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
16. I think Barr did some very clever legal crafting in that letter to make people who aren't lawyers
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:35 AM
Mar 2019

think it says things it doesn't.

For instance, it says very little about the multiple cases that got farmed out to other Federal prosecutors around the country, including whether there were any sealed indictments there, or more indictments coming. (Recent court filings in the Flynn, Gates, and Manafort contained redacted paragraphs and pages that the prosecutors said contained information about still secret, ongoing investigations. So they are still happening, somewhere.)

It didn't say anything about any "links" Mueller was tasked to investigation except for those related to their social media meddling and election hacking. But we know Rosenstein had a much broader mandate than just those areas, because the Rosenstein letter was released when Mueller was appointed.

Barr's letter also doesn't say anything about Mueller investigating human "links" between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, though we know there were quite a few, including Konstantin Kilimnik, for example. And we know Rosenstein's letter authorized him to look into those links.

So I don't think Barr necessarily made bald faced lies -- just clever, lawyerly statements designed to deceive anyone who didn't read his letter very carefully, along with the original Rosenstein letter and recent court documents.

20. Barr's letter also addressed not at all the aspect of Mueller's mandate
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 01:07 AM
Mar 2019

...that Don McGrath said got rolled into it: The question of, is Trump compromised by the Kremlin in ANY way?

That's a whole separate question from conspiracy over the election. I want to know what Mueller's conclusions are on THAT one.

greyl

(22,990 posts)
15. You're also magically from another dimension where the report has been released to public,
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 12:23 AM
Mar 2019

while being unaware of what a scumbag Donald Trump is, if "you're shocked by Mueller's report".

#ReleaseTheFullReportNOW

https://twitter.com/hashtag/releasethefullreportnow?vertical=default

misanthrope

(7,421 posts)
23. So you think Mueller is recommending indictments and has the clear evidence to back them up
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 01:57 AM
Mar 2019

but Barr utterly ignored that and chose to write an entirely fictitious summary?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you're shocked by Muel...