Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sinkingfeeling

(51,479 posts)
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 03:35 PM Aug 2012

Gay NYC judge challenges father's will

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48780911/ns/us_news-life/

NEW YORK — A gay man and his longtime partner decide to become parents using a surrogate mother. Shortly after their son is born, the couple gets married. But there's a catch for this modern family: A will left by the man's wealthy father decrees that he must marry the mother for the child to collect an inheritance.

Mandelbaum has filed a petition on behalf of his now 2-year-old son, Cooper, that argues that a condition that might "induce the beneficiary to enter into a sham marriage of convenience" should be invalid.

Joshua S. Rubenstein, a Manhattan lawyer specializing in estate planning, said decedents have a right to shun possible beneficiaries — whether it's because they have two fathers or because they married someone of a different race or any other reason that might sound unreasonable or even cruel.

"We might all find that repugnant, but it's your property and you can do whatever you want with it," Rubenstein said.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gay NYC judge challenges father's will (Original Post) sinkingfeeling Aug 2012 OP
Pretty douchey. But I suppose that is his right. 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #1
Agreed. Though I don't like it. Curtland1015 Aug 2012 #2
In Louisiana catrose Aug 2012 #3
What child has not raised his or her hand to strike the parent at least once? KamaAina Aug 2012 #5
I haven't. Neither have my kids. NaturalHigh Aug 2012 #6
Well, I think the dad should be able to will his estate to whomever he chooses. NaturalHigh Aug 2012 #4

catrose

(5,075 posts)
3. In Louisiana
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 04:33 PM
Aug 2012

you can't completely disinherit your child except for the following reasons:
1. If the child has raised his or her hand to strike the parent, or if he or she has actually struck the parent; but a mere threat is not sufficient.
2. If the child has been guilty, towards a parent, of cruelty, of a crime, or grievous injury.
3. If the child has attempted to take away the life of either parent.
4. If the child has accused either parent of any capital crime, except, however, that of high treason.
5. If the child has refused sustenance to a parent, having the means to afford it.
6. If the child has neglected to take care of a parent, become insane.
7. If a child has refused to ransom them when detained in captivity.
8. If the child used any act of violence or coercion to hinder a parent from making a will.
9. If the child has refused to become security for a parent, having the means, in order to take him out of prison. 10. If the son. or daughter, being a minor, marries without the consent of his or her parents. Civil Code, art. 1609-1613. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Disinherison

I think the minimum amount a child not guilt of these reasons must receive is 1/8 of the estate (1/16 if community property is involved).

Every other state? Disinherit away.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
6. I haven't. Neither have my kids.
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 04:49 PM
Aug 2012

Maybe it's just the way I was raised. Your comment really blew my mind.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
4. Well, I think the dad should be able to will his estate to whomever he chooses.
Fri Aug 24, 2012, 04:36 PM
Aug 2012

Crap like this always reaffirms my decision to spend every last dime before I die.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gay NYC judge challenges ...