Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(205,857 posts)
Thu Mar 21, 2019, 04:44 AM Mar 2019

Trump could be left off some states' ballots in 2020 if these bills become law

In refusing to release his tax returns, President Trump bucked decades of tradition and set off a Democrat hunt to obtain them. Now several statehouses are looking at making their release a condition of the 2020 presidential election: Show us your tax returns, or you can’t be on the ballot.

Eighteen states have considered legislation this year that would require presidential and vice presidential candidates to post their tax returns to appear on the ballot during a primary or general election, according to data from the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).

Proponents of the bills, such as the one passed by the Washington state Senate this week, say they are aimed at increasing transparency and returning to the “norm” of candidates releasing their financial records. But Democratic lawmakers behind the some of the legislation have admitted they are also very much about Trump, which raises legal and political questions about how far states can — or should — go in regulating who appears on their ballot, especially in a hyperpartisan climate.

Trump has long insisted that he won’t release his returns because they are under audit, though that would not preclude him from doing so. The documents have become something of a liberal white whale, and Democrats at the federal level have been pursuing laws or legal maneuvers aimed at obtaining them.

In addition to Washington, several other states, including California, Hawaii and New Jersey are considering similar bills. Many, though not all, of the legislatures considering the bills are controlled by Democrats, but even in Republican-controlled states, Democrats have put forth such legislation. Measures failed earlier this year in Mississippi, New Mexico and New Hampshire.


Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/03/20/trump-could-be-left-off-some-states-ballots-if-these-bills-become-law/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d63a64af27ec

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump could be left off some states' ballots in 2020 if these bills become law (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Mar 2019 OP
Good Sherman A1 Mar 2019 #1
Heh heh. "States rights" and all that jazz. . . DinahMoeHum Mar 2019 #2
Imagine the National popular vote disparity if that happens lol bearsfootball516 Mar 2019 #3
That would be a bad thing imo fescuerescue Mar 2019 #7
Certainly bad news for anyone who doesn't want to release their taxes. (nt) ehrnst Mar 2019 #4
It won't cost him any electoral votes. thesquanderer Mar 2019 #5
I doubt that these will survive a SC challenge fescuerescue Mar 2019 #6

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. Good
Thu Mar 21, 2019, 06:29 AM
Mar 2019

Of course he will sue them and play the victim, but I believe that it is a legitimate issue and as we have 50 state elections and not a federal one, this could be an interesting development.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
7. That would be a bad thing imo
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 08:35 PM
Mar 2019

Trump isn't going to lose electoral votes to the states listed. Red voters in those states won't bother going to the polls. Why would you if the Dem is running unopposed?

The unintended consequences is that with many states essentially recusing themselves from red voters, is that the popular vote will become so EXTREMELY lopsided it will give power to those folks who say it's irrelevant.

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
5. It won't cost him any electoral votes.
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 08:27 PM
Mar 2019

Any state that would do this would be blue enough that Trump wouldn't carry it anyway.

fescuerescue

(4,448 posts)
6. I doubt that these will survive a SC challenge
Fri Mar 22, 2019, 08:32 PM
Mar 2019

Especially the current court.

The constitution outlines the requirements for Presidency. I just don't see the SC forgetting about that.

In any event. He won't lose a single electoral vote over this. Looking at the list of states, it's only states that wouldn't support him anyway.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump could be left off s...