General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAristus
(66,380 posts)1. An increased desire for, and acceptance of, autocracy.
2. Wild, runaway military spending, eclipsing anything else in the way of social and physical infrastructure development and maintenance.
3. A preference for mediocrity and expediency, which are cheaper than the pursuit of excellence.
4. Staggering economic inequality.
5. Overdependence upon slave-labor. (Minimum wage work, and ultra low-wge work done by undocumented immigrants, surely count as slave labor.)
6. The ignoring of, or blatant overthrow of, long-standing political traditions designed to protect the rights of the citizens.
7. Military leaders increasing looking for personal aggrandizement over noble service to the country.
Did I miss anything?
Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)Ever-increasing government corruption.
The introduction and quickly wide-spread adaptation of a new, fanatical cult.
True Dough
(17,305 posts)I'm sure you see the effects of that daily via your workplace.
GWC58
(2,678 posts)White House, specifically the Oval Office! 🤔
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)The Roman Empire annexed Iberia from the Carthage Empire. But Iberia was an agricultural province, producing massive amounts of wheat and other grains.
The cheap wheat dropped the prices so far that many roman farmers went bankrupt and that is how a permanent economic under-class was born: the Proletariat.
babydollhead
(2,231 posts)SuperCoolPoster
(14 posts)Self-interest and going around the norms is a big one. This is an article looking at the ancient sources on this and what the ancient historians wrote about the fall of the Roman Republic:
https://gainweightjournal.com/11-lessons-from-the-fall-of-the-republic-it-is-disturbing-how-relevant-they-are-for-today/
Reading that, you are like deja-vu...
It was great while it lasted.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)his cruelty, sadism, extravagance, and sexual perversion, who was considered to be an insane tyrant.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Yep, I think I know which one you are talking about.
Clash City Rocker
(3,396 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)That will ultimately end civilization.
Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)jalan48
(13,868 posts)as long as they can maintain their power and privilege.
kskiska
(27,045 posts)It might be sooner than we expect.
dalton99a
(81,512 posts)Even as Rome was under attack from outside forces, it was also crumbling from within thanks to a severe financial crisis. Constant wars and overspending had significantly lightened imperial coffers, and oppressive taxation and inflation had widened the gap between rich and poor. In the hope of avoiding the taxman, many members of the wealthy classes had even fled to the countryside and set up independent fiefdoms. At the same time, the empire was rocked by a labor deficit. Romes economy depended on slaves to till its fields and work as craftsmen, and its military might had traditionally provided a fresh influx of conquered peoples to put to work. But when expansion ground to a halt in the second century, Romes supply of slaves and other war treasures began to dry up. A further blow came in the fifth century, when the Vandals claimed North Africa and began disrupting the empires trade by prowling the Mediterranean as pirates. With its economy faltering and its commercial and agricultural production in decline, the Empire began to lose its grip on Europe.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,858 posts)and reducing taxes on the rich are the two things that will eventually bring this country down.
arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)First Speaker
(4,858 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)JHB
(37,160 posts)As opposed to, say, Nero, the guy who was Roman emperor from 54-68 AD.
cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)lutely.
May as well fiddle!
trev
(1,480 posts)Plato held that democracy inevitably leads to tyranny.
Golden Raisin
(4,608 posts)And every day the wheels of that chariot get more dangerously wobbly.
meadowlander
(4,395 posts)But yes. 1999 was peak America in term of economic and geopolitical strength. 1968 was our cultural high water mark.
Clash City Rocker
(3,396 posts)Xolodno
(6,395 posts)...and often due to its own immediate citizens.
The British Empire to its credit, figured a way to maintain a significant portion of its dominance and accept its reducing role. I don't see that happening with the US.
We'll be a power for sure....but, not with the influence as before. Russia has risen and fallen a number of times, they know how to handle this. Likewise, the EU is filled with countries who have the same experience. Then of course there is BRIC. They are the up an comers, and some obviously have the advantage.
We have lost influence since the жопа was elected.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)We are going the way of extinction. We have lived out the Roman Empire, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the age of discovery, and especially the Industrial Age.
Its not the way of Rome because barbarians were too much to handle on top of corruption.
With us, we know what to do, but refuse. Corruption is there too. Its like Rome but not exactly.
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)Then the country will last another 400 years.
Rome didn't fall until around 400 AD.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Caligula was killed by his bodyguards. (One of whom he had continually publicly insulted with nick-names.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caligula#Assassination_and_aftermath
After many scandals, Nero was declared a public enemy by the Senate. All of his friends and allies abandoned him and he tried to flee the country in disguise to escape his execution. When the enforcers of the Senate caught up to him, he forced his secretary to stab him, so they won't catch him alive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nero#The_revolt_of_Vindex_and_Galba_and_the_death_of_Nero
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)all throw our hands up and give up on keeping freedom and democracy. Who needs to fight for rights? The apathy of this thread is more frightening than the monster in the WH.
shanny
(6,709 posts)between our empire and our democracy. I'd argue we need to lose the first to keep the second. As the UK did following WWII.
appalachiablue
(41,136 posts)SuperCoolPoster
(14 posts)This is a great topic and I wonder whether this is indeed happening. The fall of the Roman Republic can serve as a warning sign.
I am really interested in Ancient Roman history and found these two interesting articles, which go into detail on the parallels between now and that time:
https://gainweightjournal.com/11-lessons-from-the-fall-of-the-republic-it-is-disturbing-how-relevant-they-are-for-today/
https://gainweightjournal.com/the-year-ahead-2019-the-dangerous-trends-that-are-shaking-up-the-world-today/
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)raccoon
(31,111 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,977 posts)heck. read prt 1 too. ignore part 2. think its american theocracy.
SuperCoolPoster
(14 posts)What's the name of the book? American theocracy?
Celerity
(43,383 posts)rownesheck
(2,343 posts)I believe the decline began January, 1981...
brooklynite
(94,581 posts)SuperCoolPoster
(14 posts)How do we get out of becoming Rome?
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)History doesn't repeat; it rhymes.
nolabear
(41,963 posts)Civilizations rise and fall. This might be what it looks like in the 21st Century.
The sad thing is it doesnt have to be that way. But we certainly dont seem to be putting the brakes on the descent. 2020 is going to make all the difference.
SuperCoolPoster
(14 posts)I keep wondering the same thing... even started reading books on the history of that time.. so many parallels...
myohmy2
(3,163 posts)...but it looks like it...
...
SuperCoolPoster
(14 posts)Trump is like Crassus but without the skills