General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoy-for-Rachel saying MANAFORT's atty asked ELLIS to *ORDER* concurrent sentence from JACKSON
A-hole ELLIS said he couldn't "order" it but that the next judge can do (or not).
Me.
(35,454 posts)Pretty stupid of Manafort's lawyers
Baitball Blogger
(46,735 posts)Their loyalists are everywhere, and we've already seen how they don't play by the rules that apply to us.
Me.
(35,454 posts)Harvey the Rabbitt?
Baitball Blogger
(46,735 posts)We keep thinking we know all the options if they follow the rules. But they don't, do they?
Me.
(35,454 posts)You just never know
RockRaven
(14,972 posts)Sounds like they were trying to tee up a moronic justification for Trump to glom onto to excuse a pardon, i.e. that Jackson exceeded her authority by disobeying Ellis, or something.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)And has a receptive audience, even if that audience couldn't do anything about it.
The Truth Is Here
(354 posts)25 years to life, and he must serve the first 5 with hard labor.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)wishstar
(5,270 posts)My hunch is she will order a lengthy but concurrent sentence since judges tend to only order consecutive sentences for violent offenders
Jersey Devil
(9,874 posts)If that is so, then the sentences would have to be consecutive to each other for any total sentence to be over 5 years.
Nevilledog
(51,121 posts)Judges order consecutive sentences for non-violent offenses quite regularly. They look at dates of offenses, type of offenses, number of victims (if applicable). I always believed judges come up with a number in their head that they believe is appropriate and then structure it concurrently or consecutively to reach that number.
Snackshack
(2,541 posts)Manaforts lawyer asked Judge Ellis to order not recommend but order Judge Jackson to make sentences concurrent? If true that is a pretty bold and outlandish thing to do because certainly a lawyer would know that a judge could not do that and it could have serious consequences for Manafort. Wow.
Jersey Devil
(9,874 posts)It sounds like an incredibly dumb thing for any lawyer to say.
Snackshack
(2,541 posts)I did not see TRMS tonight. If it is true that would be incredible and very not too bright thing to do.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Lawyers ask for all kinds of things from judges. They get denied and move on.
Judges, in general, are not as spiteful and petty as they are frequently imagined to be.
The lawyer is seeking the minimum possible sentence for his client. He can ask the judge to order Manafort get Rice Krispies every morning. The judge would likely say denied and move on.
I think every lawyer has seen another lawyer ask a judge for some weird stuff.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)The second sentence was another doozy by Ellis. I can imagine Manafort's attorneys' asking their question, although I'm surprised they didn't know the answer already. Perhaps Manafort asked them to do so.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/paul-manafort-prison-sentence-virginia-mueller-probe