Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joy-for-Rachel saying MANAFORT's atty asked ELLIS to *ORDER* concurrent sentence from JACKSON (Original Post) UTUSN Mar 2019 OP
LIkely To Alienate Judge Jackson Me. Mar 2019 #1
They see something we don't. Baitball Blogger Mar 2019 #9
What/Who? Me. Mar 2019 #12
They live in a different world than we do. Baitball Blogger Mar 2019 #13
It Will Catch Up With Them, It Always Does Me. Mar 2019 #15
What kind of asshat attorney doesn't know that Ellis doesn't have the authority to do such a thing? RockRaven Mar 2019 #2
Almost as if they got their law degree from Trump University! bullwinkle428 Mar 2019 #3
One who is grandstanding. TwilightZone Mar 2019 #6
My hope is that Manafart's DC sentence handed down is much longer The Truth Is Here Mar 2019 #4
The max she can sentence him is 5 years for each of the two counts. n/t pnwmom Mar 2019 #16
Even if she orders a concurrent sentence of 8 to 10 years, he'll be locked up a very long time wishstar Mar 2019 #5
Isn't the max 5 years on each count in DC? Jersey Devil Mar 2019 #8
That's not been my experience. Nevilledog Mar 2019 #14
Really? Snackshack Mar 2019 #7
Did the lawyer really say that? Jersey Devil Mar 2019 #10
IDK Snackshack Mar 2019 #11
You can't win if you don't play jberryhill Mar 2019 #18
FYI Zoe Tillman (Buzzfeed New's law reporter) made mention of that in her article on the hearing... Princess Turandot Mar 2019 #17

Baitball Blogger

(46,735 posts)
9. They see something we don't.
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 11:04 PM
Mar 2019

Their loyalists are everywhere, and we've already seen how they don't play by the rules that apply to us.

Baitball Blogger

(46,735 posts)
13. They live in a different world than we do.
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 11:31 PM
Mar 2019

We keep thinking we know all the options if they follow the rules. But they don't, do they?

RockRaven

(14,972 posts)
2. What kind of asshat attorney doesn't know that Ellis doesn't have the authority to do such a thing?
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 10:32 PM
Mar 2019

Sounds like they were trying to tee up a moronic justification for Trump to glom onto to excuse a pardon, i.e. that Jackson exceeded her authority by disobeying Ellis, or something.

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
6. One who is grandstanding.
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 10:56 PM
Mar 2019

And has a receptive audience, even if that audience couldn't do anything about it.

 

The Truth Is Here

(354 posts)
4. My hope is that Manafart's DC sentence handed down is much longer
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 10:48 PM
Mar 2019

25 years to life, and he must serve the first 5 with hard labor.

wishstar

(5,270 posts)
5. Even if she orders a concurrent sentence of 8 to 10 years, he'll be locked up a very long time
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 10:52 PM
Mar 2019

My hunch is she will order a lengthy but concurrent sentence since judges tend to only order consecutive sentences for violent offenders

Jersey Devil

(9,874 posts)
8. Isn't the max 5 years on each count in DC?
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 11:03 PM
Mar 2019

If that is so, then the sentences would have to be consecutive to each other for any total sentence to be over 5 years.

Nevilledog

(51,121 posts)
14. That's not been my experience.
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 11:31 PM
Mar 2019

Judges order consecutive sentences for non-violent offenses quite regularly. They look at dates of offenses, type of offenses, number of victims (if applicable). I always believed judges come up with a number in their head that they believe is appropriate and then structure it concurrently or consecutively to reach that number.

Snackshack

(2,541 posts)
7. Really?
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 10:58 PM
Mar 2019

Manafort’s lawyer asked Judge Ellis to “order” not recommend but “order” Judge Jackson to make sentences concurrent? If true that is a pretty bold and outlandish thing to do because certainly a lawyer would know that a judge could not do that and it could have serious consequences for Manafort. Wow.

Snackshack

(2,541 posts)
11. IDK
Fri Mar 8, 2019, 11:16 PM
Mar 2019

I did not see TRMS tonight. If it is true that would be incredible and very not too bright thing to do.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
18. You can't win if you don't play
Sat Mar 9, 2019, 01:00 AM
Mar 2019

Lawyers ask for all kinds of things from judges. They get denied and move on.

Judges, in general, are not as spiteful and petty as they are frequently imagined to be.

The lawyer is seeking the minimum possible sentence for his client. He can ask the judge to order Manafort get Rice Krispies every morning. The judge would likely say “denied” and move on.

I think every lawyer has seen another lawyer ask a judge for some weird stuff.

Princess Turandot

(4,787 posts)
17. FYI Zoe Tillman (Buzzfeed New's law reporter) made mention of that in her article on the hearing...
Sat Mar 9, 2019, 12:59 AM
Mar 2019

The second sentence was another doozy by Ellis. I can imagine Manafort's attorneys' asking their question, although I'm surprised they didn't know the answer already. Perhaps Manafort asked them to do so.

Manafort's lawyer Kevin Downing asked Ellis on Thursday if the judge would be able to order Manafort's two sentences to run at the same time, but Ellis said that was up to Jackson. The judge said Manafort's lawyers could come back to him later if they found legal precedent that would give Ellis the power to do that.


https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/paul-manafort-prison-sentence-virginia-mueller-probe
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joy-for-Rachel saying MAN...