Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
Sat Mar 2, 2019, 01:13 AM Mar 2019

Hamena, Hamena, Hamena ...

Listening to the Republican spokes-whores these days is like hearing Ralph Cramden trying to worm his way out of an obvious lie when confronted by Alice: ”Hamena, hamena, hamena.”

And sadly, they somehow believe they can convince a nation that their “pResident” wasn’t out bowling with his buddies when he was supposed to be meeting Alice’s mom at the train station – and the fact that he snuck into the apartment at midnight with his ball and his bowling shoes is simply a figment of everyone’s over-active imaginations.

Watching CNN tonight, Niger Innis – when asked about Trump’s obvious lies – got so tongue-tied, he could barely respond beyond hamena, hamena, hamena. It’s been the same reaction from other GOPers when asked about Trump’s lies – basically that everyone in politics lies, hamena, hamena, hamena and this “pResident” is no different than others.

According to Washington Post’s fact checker’s database that analyzes, categorizes and tracks every suspect statement uttered by the “pResident”, Trump made 7,645 claims through Dec. 30th, the 710th day of his term in office, that were proven to be deliberately misleading or outright lies.

And the response from the Trump-humping spokes-whores is now, if nothing else, consistent: ”Hamena, hamena, hamena … I’ve never heard him lie about anything.”

Throughout the ongoing exposure of Spanky’s lies, the admonition from Republicans has been equally consistent: Don’t believe your own eyes, and don’t believe your own ears. And unfortunately, there are those among us who are stupid enough to ignore what they see and what they hear, choosing instead to believe what they are told to believe, despite all evidence to the contrary.

What it all comes down to is this: When those who support their lying “pResident” insist that he’s never lied, they themselves are lying to the people who look to them to tell the truth. When members of a political party spend their time “normalizing” lying by denying it’s even happening, it’s a sure sign that they have nothing to offer beyond hamena, hamena, hamena.

Given what is now being exposed on a daily basis thanks to House Democrats determined to investigate and expose the truth, and given what is yet to come from Mueller and the SDNY, perhaps the Republicans should consider framing their 2020 campaign around the idea that hamena, hamena, hamena is the appropriate response to the proof that their “pResident” is a lying, Russian-colluding, sexist, bigoted, racist, pussy-grabber.

”Vote Republican! Why? Well, hamena, hamena, hamena …”

It’s kind of catchy, don’tcha think? I can almost picture it on a red, made-in-China hat, proudly worn by those who used to have good-paying jobs at a US factory that manufactured slogan-embossed hats.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hamena, Hamena, Hamena ... (Original Post) NanceGreggs Mar 2019 OP
K&R smirkymonkey Mar 2019 #1
K&R 2naSalit Mar 2019 #2
Perfectly on point grantcart Mar 2019 #3
K & R Stonepounder Mar 2019 #4
I LOVE political analysis based on The Honeymooners!!! somaticexperiencing Mar 2019 #5
When the politicos you're analyzing ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #6
Just want to be clear - I do love it!!! somaticexperiencing Mar 2019 #7
LOL as soon as I saw the subject line Raine Mar 2019 #8
republicans have turned their back on truth and decency & embraced Achilleaze Mar 2019 #9
Interesting that you use a catch phrase from a guy whose other catch phrase is Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2019 #10
Ah, yes, of course ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #11
So your response is to diminish it? Cuthbert Allgood Mar 2019 #12
Diminish what?!? NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #15
Ralph routinely threatened physical violence Voltaire2 Mar 2019 #16
What is REALLY remarkable ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #17
Ok. A huge man verbally threatening a small women Voltaire2 Mar 2019 #18
The only hole-digging going on ... NanceGreggs Mar 2019 #20
I looked it up Lordquinton Mar 2019 #13
K&R Niagara Mar 2019 #14
K&R...👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼 spanone Mar 2019 #19

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
6. When the politicos you're analyzing ...
Sat Mar 2, 2019, 04:03 AM
Mar 2019

… are more Archie Bunker than President Bartlett, closer to Frank Burns than Hawkeye and BJ, more Boss Hogg than Sheriff Matt Dillon, and more reminiscent of a sit-com than a functioning administration, a comparison to The Honeymooners is as kind as one can get.

At least Ralph got a laugh when he hamena, hamena, hamenaed. When an entire political party thinks it appropriate to hem-and-haw on a daily basis, it's really not funny.

7. Just want to be clear - I do love it!!!
Sat Mar 2, 2019, 04:06 AM
Mar 2019

Not the clownish and appalling circumstances inspiring it, but love the analysis. Completely apt, completely right-on, completely appropriate.

Raine

(30,540 posts)
8. LOL as soon as I saw the subject line
Sat Mar 2, 2019, 06:32 AM
Mar 2019

I thought of Ralph Cramden and knew where you were going with it!

Cuthbert Allgood

(4,921 posts)
10. Interesting that you use a catch phrase from a guy whose other catch phrase is
Sat Mar 2, 2019, 03:36 PM
Mar 2019

"to the moon, Alice." You know, about how hard he wants to punch her when she does things like that.

I remember discussions here on DU about how bad it was that someone had a gif of Frankenstein and the girl by the lake. I'm sure the domestic violence outrage will start here soon.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
11. Ah, yes, of course ...
Sat Mar 2, 2019, 04:02 PM
Mar 2019

Who can forget the episodes where Alice was sporting a black eye, or an arm in a cast, or the way she cowered and shook in fear when Ralph threatened to send her to the moon?




Cuthbert Allgood

(4,921 posts)
12. So your response is to diminish it?
Sat Mar 2, 2019, 04:09 PM
Mar 2019

Bold choice, Cotton.

So as long as he doesn't hit her, (or hit her in a way that doesn't show) there's no problem and no abuse? I feel that that isn't true. I feel that verbal and emotional abuse are also real. I feel there are several hashtags for movements that support my position. Perhaps you disagree.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
15. Diminish what?!?
Sat Mar 2, 2019, 11:31 PM
Mar 2019

Do you seriously believe that Ralph Cramden was a wife-beater, and the audience should assume that Alice was battered off-screen in ways that wouldn’t show?

Are you for real???

The only character in The Honeymooners who ever looked scared was Ralph. All it took was for Alice to put her hands on her hips and glare at him, and he was reduced to his trademark stammer of hamena, hamena, hamena.

Alice never missed an opportunity to tell Ralph to his face when he was acting like an idiot. She never backed down, not even once.

Ralph was the one who was always trying to cover-up his lies, or his stupidity for getting entrenched in get-rich-quick schemes.

If there was any message that The Honeymooners conveyed, it was that Alice was “the boss” of the household, who brooked no bullshit from a husband who wasn’t anywhere near as savvy and as intelligent as she was.

I’m from Brooklyn, NY – and The Honeymooners was beloved by my entire family – simply for the reason that it portrayed working-class people as they really were. They fought, they threatened, and their arguments were loud enough to be known to everyone in the neighbourhood. It had nothing to do with husbands intimidating their wives – or vice versa. It had to do with how married couples interacted with each other, especially in circumstances where money was tight and the dream of “getting ahead” was always just out of reach.

Tempers flared, and threats like “one of these days, pow, right to the moon” were as commonplace as they were meaningless in the great scheme of things.

The show was never about one spouse lording it over the other – it was about a couple who loved each other no matter how difficult their lives might be.

The fact that you missed that message – as blatantly obvious as it was – is truly sad.



Voltaire2

(13,038 posts)
16. Ralph routinely threatened physical violence
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 08:12 PM
Mar 2019

Toward his wife, and in the 50s that was unremarkable. The fact that Alice coped with an abusive relationship was and still is unremarkable. What is remarkable is somebody on a progressive website defending that crap.

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
17. What is REALLY remarkable ...
Sun Mar 3, 2019, 10:05 PM
Mar 2019

... is someone trying to insist that Alice "coped with an abusive relationship" when there wasn't one.

Do you really think that anyone who watched The Honeymooners - then OR now - thought the catch-phrase "Pow, to the moon" was an actual threat?

Just stop. Before last night, I had never even heard anyone suggest such a thing.

BTW, when you hear someone say things like, "If you ate the last piece of pie, I'm going to kill you," do you really think they're threatening murder?




Voltaire2

(13,038 posts)
18. Ok. A huge man verbally threatening a small women
Mon Mar 4, 2019, 07:43 AM
Mar 2019

is just “funny”.

Sure thing. The best way out of a hole is to dig deeper. Need a shovel?

NanceGreggs

(27,814 posts)
20. The only hole-digging going on ...
Mon Mar 4, 2019, 08:06 AM
Mar 2019

... is what you're shoveling.

If you want to believe that Ralph ever actually "threatened" Alice, that's your prerogative.

What's sad is that you've completely missed what the show was really all about.

Millions of people have loved the series for decades, and consider it a true love story. If you feel some need to see it as "a huge man verbally threatening a small woman" - well, maybe you just have a need, for whatever reason, to see things that aren't there.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hamena, Hamena, Hamena .....