Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 05:08 PM Feb 2019

Absence of evidence does not equal evidence of absence.

Despite what Ken Delanian was implying (in his first breathless reports), the fact that the Manafort sentencing agreement lacks evidence about Trump/Russian collusion doesn't mean there wasn't any.

All it means is that such evidence is not included in this particular document. But it didn't need to be. This is a sentencing document and all it had to do was justify Manafort's sentence.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Absence of evidence does not equal evidence of absence. (Original Post) pnwmom Feb 2019 OP
Twitter is raking him over the coals benld74 Feb 2019 #1
KnR Hekate Feb 2019 #2
Seth manor321 Feb 2019 #3
Good post. Thanks! pnwmom Feb 2019 #4
Not bad journalism. It's lack of journalism; it's PROPAGANDA to keep tRumpanzees shuffling along. nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2019 #5
 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
3. Seth
Sat Feb 23, 2019, 05:16 PM
Feb 2019
The idea that we'd pretend these three possibilities are *equally possible* when we know Manafort secretly offered in-kind value to the Kremlin during the campaign—offered it to both Kilimnik (GRU) and Deripaska (Kremlin)—in exchange for "getting whole" is *really bad journalism*



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Absence of evidence does ...