General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Atlantic On The Pull Out Of Amazon
Amazon Got Exactly What It DeservedAnd So Did New York
Trillion-dollar companies going shopping for billion-dollar subsidies should be publicly shamed.
The most obvious losers in Amazons reversal are real-estate speculators. In November, The Wall Street Journal reported that brokers embarked on a condo gold rush in anticipation of the Queens campus construction. This is like a gift from the gods for the Long Island City condo market, one realtor told the Journal. Alas, the gods, like the billionaires, giveth and taketh away.
But it is not clear that either New York City or Amazon will suffer with this announcement. In fact, it is more likely that neither the citys nor the companys economic trajectory will be materially altered. New York City doesnt need an Amazon headquarters to be the global capital of advertising and retail, and Amazon doesnt need New York subsidies to expand its footprint in the city.
The larger truth is that corporate subsidies, including the $3 billion package offered to Amazon, are often pernicious and usually pointless. Studies show that these sorts of measures have no discernible impact on firm expansion, measured by job creation. Yet every year, local governments spend more than $90 billion to move headquarters and factories between states, a wasteful zero-sum exercise whose cost is more than the federal government spends on affordable housing, education, or infrastructure. In the most garish example of corporate-welfare absurdity, Foxconn, the Taiwanese manufacturing company, solicited up to $4 billion in subsidies from Wisconsin in exchange for a factory and tens of thousands of workers. Now its an open question whether that facility will ever get built.
But even the less garish examples are galling. New York City doesnt have an employment problem; it has a housing-affordability problem. Yet the original language of the Amazon deal used tax breaks that might have gone to infrastructure or low-income housing investment in the Long Island City region. While its hard to draw a direct line between corporate handouts and foregone public spending, the fact that states and cities cannot run persistent deficits or print their own currency, like the federal government can, implies that tax dollars lavished on corporations limit the amount of money available to other public projects. Meanwhile, the New York City subway is a disaster, and tuition is rising at the City University of New York system.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/02/amazon-cancels-new-yorks-hq2and-thats-a-good-thing/582844/
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,790 posts)cities subsidizing sports stadiums - a pet peeve of mine for years. Why should taxpayers be on the hook for any of these businesses?
theophilus
(3,750 posts)to forbid such "capitalist" adventures. Socialized risk and privatized profit. Needs to stop.....
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)Socialize the costs and privatize the profits.
alwaysinasnit
(5,066 posts)Snake Plissken
(4,103 posts)It would be adding income inequality as opposed to helping bring it inline, as we can see with the real estate speculators already trying to suck out as much money as possible out of the community resulting in an increase in the cost of living for residents in the area before ground was even broken on any buildings.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,108 posts)IMO.