General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow do DUers feel about convicted criminal and neo-con Elliot Abrams
leading the attack on Venezuela on the Con's behalf?
This monster is one of those responsible for the massacres in Central America during those 'wonderful' Reagan years.
How dare he not answer questions about his past? How dare they appoint him. Where is the outrage?
ck4829
(35,078 posts)I wish others had continued that line of questioning.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I would have liked to see more follow up.
underpants
(182,848 posts)and they get it.
malaise
(269,103 posts)and Happy Valentine's Day to you and yours
underpants
(182,848 posts)vlyons
(10,252 posts)Not a shred of shame or sorrow. He's a fixer for neo-con wat mongers.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Makes me proud of America.
gademocrat7
(10,664 posts)Another evil criminal who thinks he doesnt have to answer any questions about his behavior.
Scarsdale
(9,426 posts)full of them. People who got away with slimy acts before, with another gop president, latch onto to Dirty Donnie to continue their criminality. These are tRump's type, no shame, no ethics, no feelings except for themselves.
deminks
(11,017 posts)I cannot answer in polite settings.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)will work for the Orange Menace at this point, so when you have to scrape the bottom of the barrel, you get Abrams.
Still, I'm puzzled by your phrase "attack on Venezuela". We have a limited range of choices here, we can back Maduro, we can back Guaido, or we can just talk about Venezuela as little as possible and remain neutral.
Being as some civilized nations in this world have chosen to back Guaido, how is our backing of him an attack on Venezuela? Maduro has clearly turned a very prosperous nation into a basket case.
malaise
(269,103 posts)Spare me
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)I'd have to google up a list, but we might find another one or two on it.
In any case, what would be your preferred position on what's going on in Venezuela? I do agree that Abrams is absolutely going to make anything worse, but eventually, our candidates for the nomination are going to be called on to address this situation as to what they would do better.
What would be the most acceptable thing one of them should say?
Response to customerserviceguy (Reply #12)
NCChomskyan This message was self-deleted by its author.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)I guess I did use inappropriate language, and I apologize to anyone who took it that I was calling for imperialism.
So, then, the best thing to do is just back away, let them fight it out in Venezuela, and deal with the survivors? Anything else is imperialism, including the provision of humanitarian aid?
EndGOPPropaganda
(1,117 posts)We always have the option of providing aid, whether we back any of the presidents or not. Why would you conflate aid with backing one of the presidents?
Also, an objection to Abrams is that he was a criminal war monger before.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)that whatever we did, Abrams would probably screw it up?
What's your recommendation on Venezuela? What should our candidates say about it? Or should they say nothing at all?
Response to customerserviceguy (Reply #14)
NCChomskyan This message was self-deleted by its author.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)How do you do anything without supporting one side or the other? Maybe the safest course is to provide humanitarian aid to neighboring countries that have taken in refugees from Venezuela.
I agree with all of your listed assessments of intervention except one. Having NATO peacekeepers in the former Yugoslavia seems to have worked well after some initial trauma involved in getting them there. It tortured Bill Clinton's soul to have felt that he had done nothing during the Rwanda civil war between the Hutus and the Tutsis.
malaise
(269,103 posts)More like big guns and massacres.
Well said
OnDoutside
(19,962 posts)Blazing Saddles to put them all in context
malaise
(269,103 posts)OnDoutside
(19,962 posts)malaise
(269,103 posts)and hilarious
JT45242
(2,282 posts)When Democrats found out about the $5 million that James Baker flew to Paris to pay the Iranian government to hold on to the hostages until after the election, later delayed to after Reagan's inauguration, they should have impeached Reagan and charged all involved with treason. But they decided to take the high road since Reagan only had less than a year and a half left of his second term.
Consequently, guys like Baker, Ollie North, and this ass hat keep coming back.
Yet another case when the Democratic leadership lacked the spine to go after these guys. Just like the two stolen W Bush elections, Trump's stolen election, and the stolen elections in Florida,again, and Georgia in 2018.
This guy should have been locked up for crimes against humanity. Let's send him to the Hague along with all the documents about his cover up if the genocides.
malaise
(269,103 posts)and welcome to DU
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Remember his lame duck, dead-of-night, Christmas Eve pardons of Caspar Weinberger, Elliott Abrams, Duane Clarridge, Robert MacFarlane, Clair George, and Alan Fiers, Jr.? You don't remember? Of course not, because it's never mentioned for some reason, and certainly nobody brought it up during the recent necrogasm when Poppy shuffled off his mortal coil.
Those pardons completed the six year effort by the Reagan and Bush administrations to cover up the crimes of Iran/contra, according to Lawrence Walsh, the special prosecutor. Abrams' pardon opened the door for him to return to government during Bush the Stupider's administration, and now he's the face of the United States in another global hotspot in 2019.
More details to raise your blood pressure here.
magicarpet
(14,157 posts)Then wet vac the puddle and dump it into the nearest cesspool of raw sewage.
PeeJ52
(1,588 posts)Abrams should have been questioned more about his pleading guilty by all members. He did plead guilty from withholding evidence from Congress on withholding aid to rebels. What is to stop him from doing it again in Venezuela? Why blame Maduro if he is suspicious of accepting aid from the US through non-monitored entry points when that is how Abrams shipped arms to rebels before and admittedly lied about it to Congress? I can live with the pardon, all Presidents do it, but to put someone right back in the same position they were pardoned for bad behavior is outrageous. Abrams has no business in any government role. He should never be rehired. Would you or I be rehired at our jobs if we were convicted in previous performance? I don't think so.
hibbing
(10,100 posts)scarytomcat
(1,706 posts)taking sides is not helpful and Abrams is a very bad idea.
malaise
(269,103 posts)and separated from their parents first. Physician heal thyself and spare us the self righteous BS. We know it's about oil - Bolton said so.
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)2naSalit
(86,689 posts)MFer. That's putting it nicely. Never forget about the School of the Americas.