General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHoward Schultz: Green New Deal backed by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is "immoral" and "not realistic"
The former Starbucks CEO previously called AOC's proposed 70 percent tax rate on the super-rich "punitive"SHIRA TARLO FEBRUARY 13, 2019 4:36PM (UTC)
Pressed by CNN's Poppy Harlow to provide some kind of detail on what that number would be such as a hike of 2 percent or 10 percent or 20 Schultz said he did not know.
"I don't know what the number is," he said.
Schultz, who has never held political office, was clear on what he did not support: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's proposal of a 70 percent marginal tax rate on income earned above $10 million, which he has previously called "punitive." On Tuesday, he also slammed the New York Democrat's Green New Deal, an ambitious plan backed by Ocasio-Cortez and other Democrats to combat the threat of climate change and create jobs, as "immoral" and "not realistic."
The billionaire former CEO also did not commit to selling his Starbucks shares if he were to be elected president. Instead, he said he would "do nothing whatsoever to have any conflict of interest between my investments overall or my interests in the company that I love, because I will put the role and responsibility and the accountability for results first if I run for president. And I'm fortunate enough to win."
https://www.salon.com/2019/02/13/howard-schultz-green-new-deal-backed-by-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-is-immoral/
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)But I have no idea whats immoral about it.
madaboutharry
(40,217 posts)but "immoral"? Really Howard?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)and its "immoral" in his greedy mind him to give any of it back to society!
How Much Does a Barista Earn Per Hour?
https://work.chron.com/much-barista-earn-per-hour-14009.html
Guilded Lilly
(5,591 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Let that venti frap around your mind for a while.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Damn crook charging that much for burnt bitter coffee!
QC
(26,371 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Gotta drown it in half & half personally.
Well I'm boycotting Starbucks until this clown is no longer running so no prob now!
QC
(26,371 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)while enriching yourself at the expense of others Mr. Schultz.
dalton99a
(81,566 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)Your existence is proof of an immoral society.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)on the virtues of barely making a living in service to POS masters of the universe like himself that want to destroy the world!
Irony just died, I think.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)"he said he would "do nothing whatsoever to have any conflict of interest between my investments overall or my interests in the company"
hmmm, where have I heard that before?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Ole Howard is reading out of tRumps playbook now.
Watch it starbucks king, your mask is starting to come off!
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,956 posts)Isn't that clear.
And does he realize that we actually did tax the top marginal rate at over 70% until Reagan? How did we every survive as a country?
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)You know when the government, even republicans , gave a shit about...GASP...non billionares!!
moondust
(20,002 posts)has no doubt contributed significantly to the Great Pacific Garbage Patch and other long-term damage to the environment.
Marine life is facing "irreparable damage" from the millions of tonnes of plastic waste which ends up in the oceans each year, the United Nations has warned.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,335 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)"reasons".
Initech
(100,098 posts)After this, America will be like:
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)The 1% just love their billionaire candidates and CNN is more than happy to give them a nationwide boost whenever possible.
EveHammond13
(2,855 posts)Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)JHB
(37,161 posts)Out of 107 years of the income tax, 50 of them had a top marginal rate of 70% or higher.
None of those years were in this century, so all 50 were in the 20th.
Half.
It actually worked pretty well for the country.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,148 posts)Take your overpriced coffee and shove it up your ass.
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)In the space of few days he went from slamming the 70% top marginal rate to saying well maybe I should pay more but I dont know how much.
In that same interview though he gave away the plot
I dont trust this guy at all. He pretends to dislike trumps tax cuts, but why should i trust another billionaire inspired tax reform plan? Trump also said he would wind up paying more. How did that work out?
If you need any more why does he think it is unfair to call him a billionaire?
AnnieBW
(10,449 posts)A Green New Deal is not. STFU, Coffee Boy.
struggle4progress
(118,326 posts)bigtree
(86,005 posts)...like his coffee.
Schultz offers nothing to substitute what he's criticizing. The attention he's getting because of his personal wealth is privilege in action.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Vinca
(50,301 posts)You can have the biggest pile of cash on the planet, but if the means to sustain life are destroyed it's not going to matter a bit. If I were a young person, I would plan on not having children. The horrors they might face are worse than anything we can imagine.