General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDark money is pushing for a no-deal Brexit. Who is behind it?
By George Monbiot
Almost everywhere trust in governments, parliaments and elections is collapsing. Shared civic life is replaced by closed social circles that receive entirely different, often false, information. The widespread sense that politics has become so corrupted that it can no longer respond to ordinary peoples needs has provoked a demagogic backlash that in some countries begins to slide into fascism. But despite years of revelations about hidden spending, fake news, front groups and micro-targeted ads on social media, almost nothing has changed.
In Britain, for example, we now know that the EU referendum was won with the help of widespread cheating. We still dont know the origins of much of the money spent by the leave campaigns. For example, we have no idea who provided the £435,000 channelled through Scotland, into Northern Ireland, through the coffers of the Democratic Unionist party and back into Scotland and England, to pay for pro-Brexit ads. Nor do we know the original source of the £8m that Arron Banks delivered to the Leave.EU campaign. We do know that both of the main leave campaigns have been fined for illegal activities, and that the conduct of the referendum has damaged many peoples faith in the political system. But, astonishingly, the government has so far failed to introduce a single new law in response to these events. And now its happening again.
Since mid-January an organisation called Britains Future has spent £125,000 on Facebook ads demanding a hard or no-deal Brexit. Most of them target particular constituencies. Where an MP is deemed sympathetic to the organisations aims, the voters who receive these ads are urged to tell him or her to remove the backstop, rule out a customs union, deliver Brexit without delay. Where the MP is deemed unsympathetic, the message is: Dont let them steal Brexit; Dont let them ignore your vote.So who or what is Britains Future? Sorry, I have no idea. As openDemocracy points out, it has no published address and releases no information about who founded it, who controls it and who has been paying for these advertisements. The only person publicly associated with it is a journalist called Tim Dawson, who edits its website. Dawson has not yet replied to the questions I have sent him. It is, in other words, highly opaque. The anti-Brexit campaigns are not much better. Peoples Vote and Best for Britain have also been spending heavily on Facebook ads, though not as much in recent weeks as Britains Future.
As they must know better than most, the rules on such spending are next to useless. They were last redrafted 19 years ago, when online campaigning had scarcely begun. Its as if current traffic regulations insisted only that you water your horses every few hours and check the struts on your cartwheels for woodworm. The Electoral Commission has none of the powers required to regulate online campaigning or to extract information from companies such as Facebook. Nor does it have the power to determine the original sources of money spent on political campaigns. So it is unable to tell whether or not the law that says funders must be based in the UK has been broken. The maximum fines it can levy are pathetic: £20,000 for each offence. Thats a small price to pay for winning an election.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/feb/13/dark-money-hard-brexit-targeted-ads-facebook?CMP=share_btn_tw
lark
(23,147 posts)Javaman
(62,532 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)A country all on its own? Desperate for business-deals and without leverage to negotiate hard? A dream come true.
How long before we hear that the only way to "unleash" the british economy in the wake of the Brexit-disaster is to make it ultra-capitalist?