General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHoward Schultz Has Nothing to Say
Howard Schultz Has Nothing to Say
https://www.thenation.com/article/howard-schultz-has-nothing-to-say/
By Robert L. Borosage at the Nation
"SNIP.....
Schultz has fundamentally misread the threats facing America. To him, its not catastrophic climate change, not Gilded Age inequality, not our failed global economic strategy, not a dangerous and decrepit infrastructure, not the failure to nurture the next generation, not the growing Cold War with China and Russia: No, Schultz believes that Americas central challenge is its national debt.
Schultz is an ardent supporter of groups like Fix the Debt that lobby for a grand bargain, which would combine cuts to Social Security and Medicare with tax reforms to erase the deficit. Instead of demanding action on real crises, Schultz prioritizes action on a phony one.
Given his success, Schultz could offer a bold reform vision for the country. As a capitalist, he could make the case for financing the Green New Deal, arguing that the investment would have both social and economic returns. As an executive who offered health care to his workers, he could champion Medicare for All, detailing how it would be far less expensive and more effective. As an employer of low wage workers, he could push for raising the minimum wage and empowering workers to organize. As a billionaire, he could make the case for a wealth tax, tightening the estate tax to fend off the threat of oligarchic dynasties, or returning to progressive tax rates like those under Eisenhower.
Instead, Schultz has offered only country-club platitudes: public-private partnerships, more training, and corporate responsibility. He wraps his pabulum in what Frank Rich calls a cloak of high-minded ideals and furrowed-brow civic concern. Like Trump, he focuses on the failure of government and of the corrupted political class, ignoring the inescapable responsibility of big money and corporate lobbyists for rigging the rules against most Americans.
.....SNIP"
And fighting the national debt is what republicans get democrats to do after they have trashed the economy and the deficit themselves. Schultz is the pawn now.
struggle4progress
(118,330 posts)applegrove
(118,757 posts)Dorian Gray
(13,498 posts)Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)because we all know how seniors are "living it up" on the insurance they have paid into their entire lives. Independent my ass. Just another Republican in disguise.
he's just one more republican who doesn't want to call himself a republican!
Cha
(297,513 posts)the espresso.
It's the stupid tax cuts for the Billionaires that are skyrocketing the debt.. plus wall.. if that goes through.
Dems pay for what they do the GD repubs do NOT.
rpannier
(24,333 posts)GRABillionaire
You are 100% correct thet he's nothing more (or less) that a wanna be Republican
rpannier
(24,333 posts)Sgt. Schultz's less competent cousin
Charles Schultz's less artistic relative
Dutch Schultz's less ethical relation
Dave Schulz's less athletic relative
dweller
(23,651 posts)just STFU ...
✌🏼️
calimary
(81,435 posts)ProudMNDemocrat
(16,786 posts)Has anyone noticed that none of the Democrats who have announced their candidacies have advocated cutting these life saving programs in wanting to bring down the deficit or National Debt?
subana
(586 posts)I don't think I've ever heard of a democrat doing that for any reason! They know that people who rely on these programs don't have a lot of choices or opportunities. Only republicans try to screw the poor!
subana
(586 posts)Regarding his focus on the national debt, if he really wants to do something about the national debt, he would first have to convince republicans from passing stupid tax cuts which increase the debt by trillions of dollars! But since he himself probably benefited from their tax cuts, I'm thinking that might be ok with him. In a recent Washington Post column, E J Dionne wrote:
Oh, yes, and on those tax increases that conservatives love to hate and associate with socialism of the creeping kind a Fox News poll last week found that 70 percent of Americans favored raising taxes on families with incomes of over $10 million.
Trump's war on socialism will fail
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-war-on-socialism-will-fail/2019/02/10/b6fe3a6a-2be4-11e9-b2fc-721718903bfc_story.html?utm_term=.cf714e7beaf1
Even a clear majority of Fox viewers think the very rich should be taxed more!!! Why is it never enough for these rich guys?
The fact that his overall strategy that the real problem with the country is too much extremism in both parties, shows that he is out of touch with most people. This week on Real Time with Bill Maher, Bill had a great New Rule where he clearly illustrated why it's not true that both parties are too extreme. He said that saying both sides are equally bad is a stupid person's idea of a smart thing to say. He's right! Saying stuff like this does nothing apart from discouraging further discussion!
Here's the video, if you haven't seen it yet, I highly recommend it!
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)On Jan 29
[link:https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/29/howard-schultz-america-does-not-want-ocasio-cortezs-70percent-wealth-tax.html|]
But that must have polled badly so today he says
[link:https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/13/howard-schultz-2020-taxes-1167363|]
Harlow, keeping on the subject, threw out some figures: Maybe 2 percent higher? Possibly 10 percent? Or 20 percent?
Poppy, I dont what the number is, Schultz conceded. What I am saying is we need comprehensive tax reform.
Yeah right what we need is more bullshit billionaire inspired tax reform.
Oh and yeah Howie I'll keep using that slur "billionaire" you POS.
oasis
(49,400 posts)to letting go of his Starbucks stock if he gets elected. China's awash in Starbucks shops with no end in sight. No conflict of interest there.
Get lost Howie.
duforsure
(11,885 posts)And thinks people will accept another billionaire into office. LOL!