General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy GOD. I couldn't be prouder of House Democrats right now.
I know its just a simple appreciation OP but watching them kicking ass and taking names and brooking NONE of Whitakers bullshit runaround makes me feel like were being heard like we havent for two long years. May this be the opening of a very wide door!
Its like water to this thirsty soul.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)desk and slap the fucker
nolabear
(41,987 posts)Ive waited forever to say that.
calimary
(81,322 posts)Zorro
(15,740 posts)for their asinine behavior.
nocoincidences
(2,220 posts)and that was my exact inclination.
I'd probably break something doing it....but it would be worth it.
akraven
(1,975 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)DFW
(54,408 posts)Jerry is extremely smart and extremely patient. He has waited many years squirming as ranking member on that committee, just WAITING for the day when he could sit in the chairman's seat. That moment has now come, and he will now make the Republicans squirm just as long as he can, and he will do nothing to jeopardize his position or his ability to do that.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Of rounds in Doug Collin's face to just shut him up.
Figuratively speaking, of course, eh hem.
DFW
(54,408 posts)He can skewer Republicans verbally and leave them far more damaged than if he had used a samurai sword or a machete.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)I should really be doing something else, but dayum.
nolabear
(41,987 posts)riverwalker
(8,694 posts)Thank gawd.
nolabear
(41,987 posts)Brawndo
(535 posts)if Whitaker were testifying under a subpoena he would've been held in contempt of Congress by now and arrested, watching him dodge every question and run out the clock is tiresome. He needs to be in handcuffs for obvious contempt.
theboss
(10,491 posts)These things are pro wrestling matches for CSPAN.
Brawndo
(535 posts)if prosecuted Whitaker, who is only the acting AG (and doing a poor job of acting the part) could face consequences for failure to answer questions. The US Attorney for the District of Columbia would handle that proceeding.
theboss
(10,491 posts)There is a reason why people need to be really really really really really really careful with arresting high-level political figures. Once you start down that path, you become South America very quickly.
Brawndo
(535 posts)in effect powerless to compel witness testimony. Arresting a high-level (acting AG) politician is a small price to pay next to starting a Constitutional crisis.
Takket
(21,577 posts)Imagine what these hearings will look like when they get their teeth into the rats who sold out the country in 2016
riverwalker
(8,694 posts)Its energizing. 👏🏻
lostnfound
(16,184 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 8, 2019, 07:40 PM - Edit history (1)
For PR reasons, its brilliant. Good job Nancy.
rurallib
(62,423 posts)lord that man is incredibly sharp
BlueJac
(7,838 posts)full steam ahead and good luck, the nation will be thankful!
Scruffy1
(3,256 posts)This was some awesome questioning and they didn't let the dickheaf just filibuster his way through. I'm sure he can get his sorry ass back to Iowa and start some more business ventures like his failed apartment renovation or his failed cement business. Maybe Alex Jones is looking for a new attorney. when he brought up his US attornry experience it was too bad there wasn't time to explore his record of abusing the power of his office.
ffr
(22,670 posts)Link to tweet
.@tedlieu asked a simple yes/no question: "There's no sentence in the U.S. Constitution that says the sitting president of the United States cannot be indicted, correct?"
Whitaker refuses to answer.
Link to tweet
kag
(4,079 posts)I think I would have said, "If you can't say 'yes' or 'no' I'm going to assume you simply haven't read the Constitution and don't know the answer. Have you read the Constitution? Do you just not know what is in it?"
DontBooVote
(901 posts)from every single activist with whom I am aligned to defeat the enemy republicans here in north Texas.
There was too much filibustering and obfuscation from Whitaker and while some members were indeed elevated by their calling out of this tactic, I feel he got away with too much. Also, why can't our Dems take just a few seconds to counter the ridiculous crap coming from the republican enemies just as we citizens are doing while shouting the obvious responses at our devices?
I mean, we have the gavel, for f sake! I want the ferocity and don't-give-a-shit that rivals honey badger, not bloodless paw strikes from a de-clawed house cat. I want them to project the rage that we all have been feeling as this nightmare continues, ad infinitum!
MyOwnPeace
(16,928 posts)However, it has been EIGHT years since the Dems have controlled the house: From 2011 it was John Boehner, then Cubby Ryan.
It's been a long dry spell!
yaesu
(8,020 posts)kimbutgar
(21,163 posts)I just dont have the stomach to turn over there but I can imagine a major indignation fit going on. How dare those Democrats attack Whitaker! We are the only ones that get to attack ! How come they are not backing down?
I love payback being a bitch!
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)samnsara
(17,622 posts)..I wonder if she will do that wide grin after every word...
LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)He'll look like a school-boy in the principal's office. And he'll actually have to speak.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)Whitaker was acting like a dick because he could get away with it this time. Next time he'll be under subpoena, and it's going to be a whole different story. Any refusal to answer questions and he's off to jail, next time!
Stay tuned folks.
CaptainTruth
(6,594 posts)PatrickforO
(14,577 posts)speech. She's outstanding.