Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whitaker is in over his head. (Original Post) madaboutharry Feb 2019 OP
Is that what you call it? Looks to me more like just an extension of his neck. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2019 #1
An abcess that needs popping. DirtEdonE Feb 2019 #24
This proves Whitaker had no business getting this job. sarcasmo Feb 2019 #2
Which apparently is PatSeg Feb 2019 #15
He swims Faux pas Feb 2019 #3
What can democrats do to people who wont answer questions in manner asked ? tia uponit7771 Feb 2019 #4
Summon Whitaker to another hearing this time using a subpoena Brawndo Feb 2019 #8
thx uponit7771 Feb 2019 #32
Thanks for that info. I have wondered about this as well. diva77 Feb 2019 #35
Nadlet told Whitaker True Blue American Feb 2019 #37
Like the Repubs held Eric Holder in contempt of Congress? dumbcat Feb 2019 #36
If they don't prosecute they will in effect be declaring the Legislative branch to be powerless Brawndo Feb 2019 #40
How can you say that? dumbcat Feb 2019 #41
The difference is political Brawndo Feb 2019 #42
I see ..... dumbcat Feb 2019 #43
Yes optics, public opinion, which politicians then react to. Brawndo Feb 2019 #44
Yes he is. janx Feb 2019 #5
Seems that way to me too. MontanaMama Feb 2019 #9
This guy stalls on every GD question he is asked. democratisphere Feb 2019 #6
He was never qualified for the job padah513 Feb 2019 #7
He should go back to selling his "big dick" toilets. BigmanPigman Feb 2019 #30
that is 5 or 6 inches.....erect! dhill926 Feb 2019 #38
not watching - how is the flop sweat factor today? Bullets yet? NRaleighLiberal Feb 2019 #10
I think they painted him with pure Aluminum Chloride Hexahydrate... LakeSuperiorView Feb 2019 #16
LOL! DirtEdonE Feb 2019 #25
Freeze packs in his undies,.. really.... magicarpet Feb 2019 #26
IF there was any question whether Whitaker would put his reputation on the line bluestarone Feb 2019 #11
The only thing masculine about him is his ridiculously-named toilet Blue Owl Feb 2019 #12
All that water he's drinking has got to go somewhere. C_U_L8R Feb 2019 #13
They just took a 2 minute potty break... LakeSuperiorView Feb 2019 #17
💦💧 Traildogbob Feb 2019 #21
That made me wonder. True Blue American Feb 2019 #39
youtube link orleans Feb 2019 #14
WOW !!! ALL I CAN SAY !!!!!!!!!! WOWZER !!!!!! pangaia Feb 2019 #23
Hauled in before congress. That alone is enough to put a smile on my face. ffr Feb 2019 #18
totally incompetent while still coming off as smug and arrogant fishwax Feb 2019 #19
The prototype "conservatives" in the year 2019 Cosmocat Feb 2019 #31
Yes he's behaving horrendously ibegurpard Feb 2019 #20
he just refused to say that there is no mention in the constitution that a sitting president cannot yaesu Feb 2019 #22
A face Turbineguy Feb 2019 #27
Mr BigJunkToilet should be held in contempt of Congress and thrown into the basement brig OMGWTF Feb 2019 #28
I like your user name. :) madaboutharry Feb 2019 #45
I think this is a perfect description for someone in over their head. BobTheSubgenius Feb 2019 #29
Agreed Roadside Attraction Feb 2019 #33
Any trumper would be in murielm99 Feb 2019 #34
He has a glass face AwakeAtLast Feb 2019 #46
 

DirtEdonE

(1,220 posts)
24. An abcess that needs popping.
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 03:29 PM
Feb 2019

But the ensuing puss would engulf the entire room.

Calling Dr. Pimple Popper.

Brawndo

(535 posts)
8. Summon Whitaker to another hearing this time using a subpoena
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 01:57 PM
Feb 2019

and when he inevitably dodges questions they can hold him in contempt of Congress, that's what.

dumbcat

(2,120 posts)
36. Like the Repubs held Eric Holder in contempt of Congress?
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:44 PM
Feb 2019

For all that did.

Even if held in criminal contempt (like Holder was) the administration can decide not to prosecute (like Obama did.)

What can the committee do to Whitaker that really matters?

Brawndo

(535 posts)
40. If they don't prosecute they will in effect be declaring the Legislative branch to be powerless
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 05:03 PM
Feb 2019

Then we'll have a Constitutional crisis on our hands. As for the DOJ, if all that matters is the Executive branch's opinion, then why is the Mueller investigation allowed to exist? Because they don't want to die on that hill. Whitaker is no where near as safe as Holder was.

dumbcat

(2,120 posts)
41. How can you say that?
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 05:36 PM
Feb 2019

That's exactly what Pres Obama did to the Repug congress when they didn't prosecute AG Eric Holder after he was held in criminal contempt. They (the Repub congress) were powerless to do anything. Same as now. I don't seem to remember us worrying about any Constitutional crisis when we did it. Why would they?

This will all be forgotten when the next "Constitutional crisis" comes along.

Brawndo

(535 posts)
42. The difference is political
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 06:02 PM
Feb 2019

There is broad public support to protect the Mueller investigation against interference from Whitaker/tRump, whereas there was no where near the same level of support for going after Holder. Fast and Furious was GOP BS, protecting the Mueller investigation is something We The People actually care a lot about. Same setting, way different circumstances. The optics look like the Executive branch giving the finger to the Legislative branch and I bet you that's not going to sit well with most Americans. We disagree on this and that's fine, I doubt either of us is a Constitutional scholar. Maybe one of those is on DU and can settle it for us.

Brawndo

(535 posts)
44. Yes optics, public opinion, which politicians then react to.
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 06:18 PM
Feb 2019

Do you think tRump would've hesitated to squash the Mueller investigation if majority public opinion was on his side? It IS a factor, hell even Impeachment is a political act.

janx

(24,128 posts)
5. Yes he is.
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 01:54 PM
Feb 2019

It looks as if he is getting flak from all sides and is trying to save his own hide.

ETA: He and the Republicans are trying to obfuscate, but for different reasons.

BigmanPigman

(51,608 posts)
30. He should go back to selling his "big dick" toilets.
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:07 PM
Feb 2019

I think he is better suited for it. Look at his head for Christ's sake. It is a perfect match, in fact he is a walking advertisement for his product.

"...and something called the Masculine Toilet, which is designed to help “well-endowed men” keep their big ol’ dicks out of their toilet bowls, according to Mother Jones. Apparently, the standard-sized bowl on your American Standard toilet just doesn’t cut it for the wannabe Jon Hamms of the world."

"The average male genitalia is between 5” and 6”,” a press release for the product reads. “However, this invention is designed for those of us who measure longer than that.” To solve the pressing dick-in-the-toilet problem, InventVillage.com, the company behind the Masculine Toilet, claims its product allows a full 12 inches of space between the rim of the shitter and the water. Need a toilet bowl with more than a full foot of space? No worries. These penis pros say they can happily create an “extra long version” if necessary."

https://www.playboy.com/read/matthew-whitaker-and-his-big-dick-toilets-are-an-emblem-for-2018-1

dhill926

(16,340 posts)
38. that is 5 or 6 inches.....erect!
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:48 PM
Feb 2019

these guys all sport wood when they go poo-poo? Vey, very strange....

 

LakeSuperiorView

(1,533 posts)
16. I think they painted him with pure Aluminum Chloride Hexahydrate...
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 02:59 PM
Feb 2019

Probably stuffed his tightie whities with freezer packs too.

 

DirtEdonE

(1,220 posts)
25. LOL!
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 03:31 PM
Feb 2019

"Probably stuffed his tightie whities with freezer packs too."

A new definition for "blue balls"?

This fucker needs to be totally put on ice. For a LONG time.

magicarpet

(14,155 posts)
26. Freeze packs in his undies,.. really....
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 03:32 PM
Feb 2019

Good Lord,.. his dick will size up smaller than King Oranges'. How embarrassing is that ?

Well that is one consolation,.. that will make pResident trDump very proud that his room temp penis is bigger than Matt Whitaker's icebox panties micro wee-wee.

bluestarone

(16,972 posts)
11. IF there was any question whether Whitaker would put his reputation on the line
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 02:09 PM
Feb 2019

It's FUCKING been answered HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He's a co conspirator!!!!! No doubt in my mind!!!!!!!!

Traildogbob

(8,748 posts)
21. 💦💧
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 03:08 PM
Feb 2019

He rehydrates by osmoticly taking up water through his balls and huge penis having to be submerged in the normal toilets in the building.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
23. WOW !!! ALL I CAN SAY !!!!!!!!!! WOWZER !!!!!!
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 03:17 PM
Feb 2019

This little shit is such an obvious liar, avoider and obfuscator.

And the DEMS are locked and loaded... !!

fishwax

(29,149 posts)
19. totally incompetent while still coming off as smug and arrogant
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 03:05 PM
Feb 2019

in other words, the perfect fit for a trump administration

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
20. Yes he's behaving horrendously
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 03:05 PM
Feb 2019

But you make a huge mistake if you think he doesn't know what he's doing and doesn't have a lot of backing

yaesu

(8,020 posts)
22. he just refused to say that there is no mention in the constitution that a sitting president cannot
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 03:08 PM
Feb 2019

be indicted.

BobTheSubgenius

(11,564 posts)
29. I think this is a perfect description for someone in over their head.
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:04 PM
Feb 2019

Purportedly from a British employee's performance review:

"Out of his depth in a car park puddle."

 
33. Agreed
Fri Feb 8, 2019, 04:31 PM
Feb 2019

I watched the first half hour of the hearings. When Whitaker started answering his first questions from the chairman it was clear Whitaker is not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Dumb as a post. Has a few pet phrases memorized and that's it. He's a perfect example of how Trump hires only the best.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whitaker is in over his h...