General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRyan: Women’s Health Exception Rendered Abortion Ban ‘Virtually Meaningless’
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) opposed an exception to a so-called partial birth abortion ban when the procedure was necessary to save the mothers life, according to a 2000 floor speech on the issue. Claiming the womens health exception included in the bill wide enough to drive a mack truck through, Ryan argued uncompromisingly for it to be removed:
This is not a political issue, this is a human issue. And let me just say this to all of my colleagues who are about to vote on this issue, on the motion to recommit the health exception is a loophole wide enough to drive a mack truck through it. The health exception would render this ban virtually meaningless. [...] [H]undreds of OB/GYNs have told us that this is not medically necessary.
Watch it:
Contra Ryans claim that the procedure (also known as intact dilatation and extraction, or D&E) could never be medically necessary, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists held that D&E reduced the risk of catastrophic hemorrhage and life-threatening infection and that [t]hese safety advantages are widely recognized by experts in the field of womens health, authoritative medical texts, peer-reviewed studies, and the nations leading medical schools. As such, the American Medical Association, which believes D&E would be employed for health reasons in only a very small number of cases, said that the physician must retain the discretion to use D&E if a particular womans health needs demand it.
more: http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/08/22/726411/ryan-womens-health-exception-rendered-abortion-ban-virtually-meaningless/
surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)... but only because these procedures are only preformed when there is a serious risk to the woman's health. Doctors are not doing this for fun.