General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm NOT watching the state of the union speech. But I am going to turn
on Abrams giving the rebuttal in the hopes her viewing numbers will be higher then trump's.
If her numbers are better, let him put that in his pipe and smoked it.
SCantiGOP
(13,871 posts)Unless youre one of the Neilsen families, no one knows who watches what.
shraby
(21,946 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,342 posts)HULU AND YOUTUBE TV NOW INCLUDED IN TV RATINGS ANNOUNCES NIELSEN
https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/press-room/2017/hulu-and-youtube-tv-now-included-in-tv-ratings-announces-nielsen.html
I think DirecTV and others are also sharing information too.
Squinch
(50,992 posts)Gothmog
(145,487 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)the Trump extravaganza. He's even selling advertising for it.
I'll watch Abrams, though, either that night or next day. I can't watch Trump's "show."
Big Blue Marble
(5,127 posts)Many of us will just watch Abrams.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I don't think I can take it, so I'll pass.
Most people don't know who Abrams is, and won't care. But it's an introduction to those who do care. We'll see what the ratings are and how well she does. If she can avoid being totally boring (most responses to the SOTU are),and if she can avoid doing something that makes her the butt of late night show jokes (which is often what happens), she'll have succeeded.
I have seen her give only one speech, but I was impressed. I'm sure she'll be one of the better ones. I thought Joe Kennedy did great last year, despite the chapstick.
Squinch
(50,992 posts)Cha
(297,506 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,362 posts)They'll be the highest numbers of all time. Way higher than Obama's numbers, which were all fake by the way, and filled with illegal alien rapists and criminals watching. Nobody will ever have numbers higher than Trump's.