Roger Stone has publicly claimed he was not read his Miranda Rights by the FBI

[TeamPooka]

when arrested.
I don't believe him.
If the FBI has video of him being read his rights they should release the clip and then get the Judge to issue a gag order on Stone on comments publicly and to the press because of the lie.
That's how you deal with a liar.

[jberryhill]

1. Who cares - It doesn't matter

Are they planning to use any post-arrest statements against him?

Did they interrogate him at all?

I doubt it.

[ProudLib72]

5. But, but, but Miranda Rights!

He's throwing shit that is similar in nature to "But her emails" in the hopes that something will stick. Expect Lindsey Graham to pick up on this shortly.

[Horse with no Name]

17. Exactly.

They didn’t need that lying liar making a statement that was a lying lie.
They just need his hard drives to prosecute him.

[louis-t]

2. I thought I heard that it is not necessary anymore.

Have to look that up.

[jberryhill]

6. It's never been necessary

It is helpful for the police to read them in the event the suspect starts talking or else voluntarily answers questions during interrogation.

But, no, it is not necessary.

It only becomes an issue if a post-arrest statement is used as evidence against the suspect.

[hlthe2b]

14. yup... this

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

9. The Miranda warning is still required if someone is being questioned while in custody

but only if that person's statements are later to be used against them. If they didn't question Stone (and they probably didn't), it wasn't necessary. It's just a warning that a person's statements can be used against them if they are charged with a crime, and that they have the right not to talk to the police and to have an attorney present.

[Xipe Totec]

3. 1) He's obviously aware of his Miranda rights 2) He's blabbing publicly about the case

Any rights he might have had to STFU, he's lost already.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

4. Even if true (which I doubt), that doesn't matter in the least if they didn't question him,

and they probably didn't. Their job was to haul him in, collect his stuff, and let Mueller deal with the questioning.

[redstatebluegirl]

7. Oh please!!! No way, this isn't Barney Fife that showed up at his house.

[NRaleighLiberal]

8. when a republicans lips move, they are lying.

[Siwsan]

10. I would think the agents drew straws to see who GOT to be the one to Mirandize Stone

[RAB910]

11. That would only exclude any statements made prior to a lawyer

[KWR65]

12. They only have to read him his rights...

After he was arrested and when they are going to question him. If they don't question him then it is perfectly legal not to read him his Miranda warnings.

[marylandblue]

13. It isn't like TV, where they automatically read you your rights.

They can do it anytime prior to interrogation, if they interrogate you, which they often don't. I think particularly in a case like this, there is no point to an interrogation. They've already spoken to him with his lawyer present before the arrest.

[Horse with no Name]

18. Before he is questioned by Mueller

They will have him sign a statement that he was read his rights.
These aren’t amateurs.

[LakeSuperiorView]

15. You can bet they knew damn near everything about him before they left the office.

Other than FBI, Open the door, Warrant, and Jesus Christ, put some pants on, they probably didn't say much to him.

[obamanut2012]

16. They recorded every single second

Leading up to the arrest, during the arrest, and after the arrest.