Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,356 posts)
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 11:04 PM Jan 2019

Just Lost His Leverage for Building a Wall

By Jonathan Bernstein

... Will Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans let him twist in the wind, bleeding away support little by little while the nation continues to suffer the consequences of the closure? Or will they finally move to end this fiasco?

First, here’s what the Senate did. Neither Trump’s plan nor the Democratic alternative reached the 60 votes needed to defeat filibusters. But two Republicans — Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Utah’s Mike Lee — opposed Trump’s bill; only one Democrat, West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, voted for it. With one absent Democrat and two missing Republicans, that meant a narrow 50-to-47 margin. The point of Trump’s proposal was supposedly to demonstrate that he could pick off enough Democrats by floating a measure labeled as a compromise. However, since the plan added restrictions on asylum and on Temporary Protected Status, and offered very limited protections, there was very little to tempt Democrats who may have wanted a deal. Instead, the vote demonstrated only that there is no easy bargain to be made on Trump’s terms. Giving Democrats very little — enough to bring over just one vote — cost Trump two Republican votes.

Meanwhile, the Democrats’ clean funding bill to reopen the government while negotiations continue on border safety, a bill that had passed the House easily, did well in the Senate as six Republicans joined every Democrat to get a 52-to-44 margin. That’s far short of 60. But it’s a solid majority, and a bigger one than Trump’s bill got, despite the Republican’s 53-47 majority in the chamber.

So the government remains closed because the Senate majority party is successfully killing by filibuster the most viable path to reopening it, which is a measure that has some fair claims to being bipartisan, and definitely has a majority in both chambers of Congress. Various versions of the Democrats’ clean bill have passed repeatedly in the House, each time with full Democratic support and a handful of Republican votes.

There hasn’t been a House vote on the Trump plan, but based on the Senate vote it’s a fair guess that it would suffer more Republican defections than it would gain Democrats crossing over ...

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-25/senate-vote-shuts-down-trump-s-gambit-to-end-the-shutdown

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just Lost His Leverage for Building a Wall (Original Post) struggle4progress Jan 2019 OP
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Jan 2019 #1
It's not just Trump that is bleeding support... Wounded Bear Jan 2019 #2
Me too.......wish the Dems would have taken the Senate as well as the House...... a kennedy Jan 2019 #3
The map killed us in '18 (corrected)... Wounded Bear Jan 2019 #4
I think you meant 2018 TheRealNorth Jan 2019 #5
Oops! My bad... Wounded Bear Jan 2019 #6
We also picked up 2 seats in 2016. Ace Rothstein Jan 2019 #7
And the Presidency AllyCat Jan 2019 #9
"With any normal White House, ..." AllyCat Jan 2019 #8

Wounded Bear

(58,721 posts)
2. It's not just Trump that is bleeding support...
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 11:17 PM
Jan 2019

at least 6 Repubs in seats at risk in 2020, 16 more up for re-election then, including McConnell.

This goes on much longer and the Senate could have a swing like the House saw last November, I hope.

TheRealNorth

(9,500 posts)
5. I think you meant 2018
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 11:29 PM
Jan 2019

There some senate races in '16 that we should have won (WI, PA) if it were not for the Russian campaign targeting Dems that resulted in low turnout.

Ace Rothstein

(3,186 posts)
7. We also picked up 2 seats in 2016.
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 11:40 PM
Jan 2019

Should have picked up the two you mentioned as well. Kander also came really close in MO.

AllyCat

(16,233 posts)
8. "With any normal White House, ..."
Fri Jan 25, 2019, 01:39 AM
Jan 2019

And later “Of course, with any normal President, we wouldn’t be in this situation in the first place.”

Awesome!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just Lost His Leverage fo...