General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJust Lost His Leverage for Building a Wall
By Jonathan Bernstein
... Will Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans let him twist in the wind, bleeding away support little by little while the nation continues to suffer the consequences of the closure? Or will they finally move to end this fiasco?
First, heres what the Senate did. Neither Trumps plan nor the Democratic alternative reached the 60 votes needed to defeat filibusters. But two Republicans Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Utahs Mike Lee opposed Trumps bill; only one Democrat, West Virginias Joe Manchin, voted for it. With one absent Democrat and two missing Republicans, that meant a narrow 50-to-47 margin. The point of Trumps proposal was supposedly to demonstrate that he could pick off enough Democrats by floating a measure labeled as a compromise. However, since the plan added restrictions on asylum and on Temporary Protected Status, and offered very limited protections, there was very little to tempt Democrats who may have wanted a deal. Instead, the vote demonstrated only that there is no easy bargain to be made on Trumps terms. Giving Democrats very little enough to bring over just one vote cost Trump two Republican votes.
Meanwhile, the Democrats clean funding bill to reopen the government while negotiations continue on border safety, a bill that had passed the House easily, did well in the Senate as six Republicans joined every Democrat to get a 52-to-44 margin. Thats far short of 60. But its a solid majority, and a bigger one than Trumps bill got, despite the Republicans 53-47 majority in the chamber.
So the government remains closed because the Senate majority party is successfully killing by filibuster the most viable path to reopening it, which is a measure that has some fair claims to being bipartisan, and definitely has a majority in both chambers of Congress. Various versions of the Democrats clean bill have passed repeatedly in the House, each time with full Democratic support and a handful of Republican votes.
There hasnt been a House vote on the Trump plan, but based on the Senate vote its a fair guess that it would suffer more Republican defections than it would gain Democrats crossing over ...
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-25/senate-vote-shuts-down-trump-s-gambit-to-end-the-shutdown
tblue37
(65,490 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,721 posts)at least 6 Repubs in seats at risk in 2020, 16 more up for re-election then, including McConnell.
This goes on much longer and the Senate could have a swing like the House saw last November, I hope.
a kennedy
(29,711 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,721 posts)it's much more favorable in '20.
TheRealNorth
(9,500 posts)There some senate races in '16 that we should have won (WI, PA) if it were not for the Russian campaign targeting Dems that resulted in low turnout.
Wounded Bear
(58,721 posts)Ace Rothstein
(3,186 posts)Should have picked up the two you mentioned as well. Kander also came really close in MO.
AllyCat
(16,233 posts)AllyCat
(16,233 posts)And later Of course, with any normal President, we wouldnt be in this situation in the first place.
Awesome!