Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

brooklynite

(94,737 posts) Thu Jan 24, 2019, 05:03 PM Jan 2019

BREAKING: Michael Cohen Subpoenaed by Senate

Link to tweet

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: Michael Cohen Subpoenaed by Senate (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2019 OP

K&R... spanone Jan 2019 #1

the republican senate where he will be asked softball questions in secret nt msongs Jan 2019 #2

Senate Intel has actually been fairly bipartisan brooklynite Jan 2019 #3

members Skidmore Jan 2019 #4

Thanks, Skid! Cha Jan 2019 #5

spanone

(135,880 posts)

1. K&R...

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu Jan 24, 2019, 05:04 PM

Jan 2019

msongs

(67,443 posts)

2. the republican senate where he will be asked softball questions in secret nt

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu Jan 24, 2019, 05:04 PM

Jan 2019

brooklynite

(94,737 posts)

3. Senate Intel has actually been fairly bipartisan

Reply to msongs (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 24, 2019, 05:10 PM

Jan 2019

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)

4. members

Reply to brooklynite (Original post)

Thu Jan 24, 2019, 05:16 PM

Jan 2019

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/

Chairman
Richard Burr
North Carolina

Vice Chairman
Mark Warner
Virginia

Committee Members

Republicans
James Risch Idaho
Marco Rubio Florida
Susan Collins Maine
Roy Blunt Missouri
Tom Cotton Arkansas
John Cornyn Texas
Ben Sasse Nebraska

Democrats
Dianne Feinstein California
Ron Wyden Oregon
Martin Heinrich New Mexico
Angus King Maine
Kamala Harris California
Michael Bennet Colorado

Cha

(297,692 posts)

5. Thanks, Skid!

Reply to Skidmore (Reply #4)

Thu Jan 24, 2019, 05:18 PM

Jan 2019

Reply to this discussion