General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuestion to all my well informed friends around here.
Suppose Trump shows up on the 29th with some let say.. Capital Police, or some other kind of Capital law Enforcement groups...
This guy is crazy enough to show up and force some type of physical confrontation with Pelosi and the Dems.
I ask: Is my thought feasible? And what are the options for Dems if Trump does confront Pelosi at doors of the Chambers.?
unblock
(52,317 posts)alternatively, pelosi can order all cameras turned off.
or, of course, all the democrats can shout him down.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Lights, etc.??
unblock
(52,317 posts)donnie's nuts, but i can't see him breaking and entering and trespassing all for the hope of a few moments on air in a particular venue.
why wouldn't he just give the speech from one of his rallies, or the senate, or some state legislature or whatever?
or, hell, from the oval office?
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Even the Secret Service can't and likely wouldn't even think of trying.
shanny
(6,709 posts)Pull the breakers if need be. What matters most is the audience; if rump doesn't have one / can't reach one....
I wonder if McTurtle is secretly grateful for the reining in of the toddler in chief
Siwsan
(26,289 posts)If the cameras aren't set up to broadcast him, why would he bother showing up?
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)The only thing I can see him physically confronting is a Big Mac supervalue meal.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)It will not be televised either since Nancy Pelosi decides that as Speaker.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Let him. History is still made and will shoe she turned her Speakers gavel into a paddle and spanked him thoroughly.
lamsmy
(155 posts)busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Very Helpful.. I'm gonna post it too..
Thanks!
https://amp.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/white-house/article224681770.html?__twitter_impression=true
atreides1
(16,093 posts)As an elected officer of the House of Representatives, the Sergeant at Arms is the chief law enforcement and protocol officer of the House of Representatives, and is responsible for maintaining order in the House side of the United States Capitol complex.
The Sergeant at Arms, serves as a member of the U.S. Capitol Police Board, responsible for policy oversight over the Capitol Police Force, and is the chairman of this Board in alternating years. As Sergeant at Arms, Mr. Irving also serves on the Congressional Accessibility Services Board.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Atticus
(15,124 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)This disgusting fake Presidency has turned into a major civics lesson.
lpbk2713
(42,766 posts)He won't want to risk public humiliation again.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Any Republican House Member would likely do that, so it's unlikely that the Sergeant-at-Arms will block his entry into the chamber. But he can't speak from the floor or approach the rostrum without the Speaker's permission.
pecosbob
(7,543 posts)No cameras, no speech.
moondust
(20,006 posts)Will he simply use his thugs to force their way in and take over?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,600 posts)Correction: Trump does have the privilege to be in the House Chamber but he cant address the House and Senate without a joint resolution.
Link to tweet
DFW
(54,436 posts)They like to invade places like Panama and the tiny Caribbean island of Grenada. They avoid invading places they think will shoot back (Iraq was a miscalculation, not an exception), which is why they will never even consider invading Iran or North Korea--or the House chamber with armed cops to bar the entrance.
Please do not lose sight of the following: the fact that deciding against invading Iran or North Korea are two decisions of great common sense is pure coincidence, and not some sudden attack of pragmatism on their part.