General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsbearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)They knew whatever boycott happens with right wing nuts will be significantly offset by revenue gained by people who are happy with them.
Same thing with Nike's Colin Kaepernick stuff. They didn't even feel the tiny bit of loss they got from Trump supporters not buying Nike anymore because their worldwide sales skyrocketed.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,335 posts)cannabis_flower
(3,765 posts)I haven't seen the ad. Can someone provide a link please?
area51
(11,918 posts)Flaleftist
(3,473 posts)An ad that basically are just says don't be an asshole? Wow!
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)uriel1972
(4,261 posts)justhanginon
(3,290 posts)I personally like the ad i've seen and think it is a welcome message. There are still way to many knuckle draggers out there.
That commercial has all the charm of a pro-life "Don't kill your baby!" ad. Youtube dislikes is reaching nearly 1 million, almost double the likes. I seriously doubt Gillette thinks more than half their customers are worth dumping.
Beyond that the commercial is wrong on so many levels. Bad behavior is not exclusive men. Yet the commercial wallows in disgusting male stereotypes that if directed at any other race or gender would be legitimately called bigotry. How many stories have there been about mean girls harassing some girl to suicide? Or two girls attempting to murder a classmate over Slender man by stabbing her 19 times? Or how about the woman who sticks her roommate's toothbrush in her butt? Or how about all the women who can't let Black people BBQ in the park?
If Gillette came out with a commercial named "Women can do better" and showed a bunch of scenarios of women gossiping, backstabbing, and leaving their kids parked in hot cars I'd feel the same way.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"I seriously doubt Gillette thinks more than half their customers are worth dumping..."
You can provide us with the objective numbers of their customer base divided into the relevant demographics then to support your allegation, yes?
ZX86
(1,428 posts)No. But it's really on the OP to provide empirical evidence that people disliking the ad campaign are incels and MRA's and are worth dumping.
The commercial is offensive because it asserts that men by default have the morals and ethics of Donald Trump. I don't know anyone (man or woman) that believes that harassing and molesting people is socially acceptable.
Response to ZX86 (Reply #11)
Post removed
ZX86
(1,428 posts)Minimizing the effects of harassment by women as "catty" is just as bad as, "boys will be boys".
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)"Racial profiling" is something that was made up a few years ago to mimimize the rampant violence and disrespect for police that black people have. Unless you can prove all police officers as a class are trying to kill black people, there is no problem with racism in police culture."
ZX86
(1,428 posts)It's a made up word to promote a political agenda.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)So does that make racial profiling non-existent and "made up?"
That is how a caucasian Trumper react to reports of racial profiling by police officers....
Or an MRA to someone using the word "misogyny."
ZX86
(1,428 posts)Your straw man arguments have nothing to do with what I have stated. I'm Black. I have sat on more curbs than I can count as my car was searched because some cop smelled something. I don't need lessons from anyone on police harassment. It's not an intellectual exercise for me. i live in the same zip code as the Rodney King beating.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)All words were made up at some point.
And the company is advertising a product targeted at males.
MLAA
(17,318 posts)Trump rallies aren't my thing. Am I missing anything?
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 18, 2019, 02:38 PM - Edit history (1)
sounds very much like people at a Trump rally.
You're welcome.
Response to ehrnst (Reply #63)
Post removed
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Male entitlement.
Incels (a portmanteau of involuntary celibates) are members of an online subculture who define themselves as unable to find a romantic or sexual partner despite desiring one, a state they describe as inceldom.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)As in "reverse sexism?"
Seriously?
You whipped out that list of misogynist tropes pretty fast...
If you want to debate an MRA I suggest you find one.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)you concerned with all harassment. You don't pick and choose which harassment is problematic.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Do you stand around at a Run for the Cure with a sign that says "MEN's Cancer is Important TOO!!!"
And yell "You don't PICK AND CHOOSE what cancer to raise awareness about and fundraise for!!!"
ZX86
(1,428 posts)As a Black man I have a problem with White women calling the police on me for existing in public. Yet I would still reject an ad campaign called, "White women could do better".
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)That ad really gets under your skin doesn't it? If you're not a part of that problem, then why are you so defensive towards it?
And no, to say that toxic masculinity is a problem does not = saying "all men as a class have toxic masculinity"
That's also known as a "false dillema."
ZX86
(1,428 posts)A "Don't kill your baby!" ad campaign would get the same reaction from me.
Someone saying, "Please don't kill your baby or leave them in a hot car. Now I'm not saying all women leave new born babies in trash cans, young children in hot cars, or drive their kids into lake because they got a new boyfriend. And if this doesn't apply to you, you shouldn't take offense." I would find offensive.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Your false equivalence using language you think will "trigger" feminists shows some real resentment towards women.
Does this ad make you feel emasculated? Did a woman make you feel emasculated - and you are mad because you don't think women get equal time being being called out for what one did to you?
You clearly want a fight about this - you are alone in your idea on this thread. It looks like a wish to take all that anger about feeling emasculated out on women and men who aren't as mad at women.
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)You hit all the bingo squares there.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)I don't run in those circles.
I reject whataboutism as something to be avoided. Growing up in the civil rights movement I was all about whataboutism. What about the White drinking fountain? What about the front of the bus?
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)You're welcome.
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)Just yes or no.
MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)You seem to be offended at that label but have no problem repeating their dangerous bullshit.
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)about toxic masculinity and violence against women and children.
textbook
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)Because that sounds like a MRA rant. Or a MGTOW rant.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)from some White dominated corporation.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)like "racism?"
ZX86
(1,428 posts)putting out a commercial featuring an over abundance of Black men telling them they need to do better.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,387 posts)Is it the one that shows MOC being half of the examples of healthy masculinity? The one that shows a MOC being one out of a dozen bad examples?
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)And they are putting out ads to make men feel unnecessarily bad about themselves?
Not so much...
https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/people.asp?privcapId=29004
You really do sound like an "All Lives Matter" apologist.
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,387 posts)Right but have you ever seen a commercial.
Aristus
(66,436 posts)No.
It's just a message apropos of and specific to an important cultural problem right now.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)How many young women have been driven to suicide by mean girls harassing them?
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,387 posts)itself in sexualized harassment, and other times expresses itself through discouraging emotions, encouraging unnecessary aggression, and acceptance of gender-based roles.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)I have comforted more women from the toxic behavior of mean girls than I can count. How many stories right here on DU about some White woman harassing some POC at a school library, public park, boardwalk, etc. It's posted here near daily yet I would would bristle at at ad campaign named, "White women could do better".
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Were they "made up" too?
And now were going into "I'm not bigoted at all! Some of my best friends...." territory.
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)White people can and should do better.
Would you prefer to see black males take on toxic masculinity? Many examples are just a google search away. The commercial was not meant to be race specific, but rather gender specific.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,348 posts)It's not saying that 'masculinity' is 'toxic'; it's saying there is a problem when people justify toxic behaviour as 'just an inevitable part of masculinity'.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,387 posts)to understand.
An ad campaign called "white women could do better" would be awesome, actually, because that's also true. "Calling in" can be much more effective than calling out, and this commercial is a great example of it. All of us can do better, but in different ways. A male-dominated company calling in men to do better is one of the most effective ways to effect change.
In this case, this particular phrase (not word) is one that very accurately describes the problems and issues. There's no rational reason for any reasonable person to be upset with it. Anyone who chooses to deflect and distract from the issues by claiming that it's "made-up" doesn't really change anything and it indicates a position of weakness or emotional insecurity. All I'm saying is that it serves no good purpose to deny the obvious, or to not accept facts, or to try and be dismissive to people, many of whom are already victimized and marginalized.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)That commercial is very much like the "Don't kill your baby" type ads the pro-lifers run.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)It's like the Colin Kaepernick Nike ad that got so many white people angry and defensive.
Get it?
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)ou you aren't making yourself very credible by complaining that there also needs to be one that criticizes women, because men will get their feelings hurt
As if the 2016 POTUS election didn't do that already...
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)My heart bleeds.
Look Men do most of the physical violence around this world, we could use a little reminder now and then, that men can and must do more to stop this.
Disclaimer: I am a form of male.
ps: I am a SJW and proud of it.
obamanut2012
(26,094 posts)And the public health menace of toxic masculinity.
Your post is ridiculous.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)Toxic masculinity is now a public health menace? It's a made up word that nobody heard of a couple years ago.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Nobody had a diagnosis of TMJ until the early 1990s because the description of the cluster of symptoms hadn't been promulgated by the health care community. Nobody had a diagnosis of AIDS until the early 1980s for the same reason. That doesn't mean people didn't suffer from TMJ or AIDS before those conditions were given an official diagnosis. "Toxic masculinity" has come to be the descriptor for a cluster of symptoms and behavior that have existed for a long time.
Clearly, you're uncomfortable with practitioners of toxic masculine behavior being called out and held accountable for actions that they have gotten away with in the past. Sorry your world has taken such a hit. Maybe tomorrow will be a better day, but it sounds like you're determined to make it a bitter day.
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)Here is a Meduum essay that may help
https://medium.com/s/man-interrupted/why-we-must-stop-saying-toxic-masculinity-cfe83b9034dc
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)recently?
Listen to yourself....
uponit7771
(90,348 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)If you want to discuss that issue with someone you should engage with someone who has said it.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Is that clearer?
tenderfoot
(8,438 posts)you'll look prettier.
ismnotwasm
(41,998 posts)Initech
(100,097 posts)ZX86
(1,428 posts)You fail to get the opposition to it.
Initech
(100,097 posts)Those are the ones who are missing the point entirely.
ZX86
(1,428 posts)I hate Exxon. But I don't drain my car of gas every time I come home.
Initech
(100,097 posts)- Keurigs: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/keurig-sean-hannity_us_5a092dd2e4b0e37d2f386416
- NFL merchandise: https://www.avclub.com/here-are-the-inevitable-videos-of-angry-men-burning-the-1818727065
- Nike merchandise: https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/404907-kaepernick-ad-campaign-prompts-customers-to-destroy-nike-products
- Taylor Swift merchandise: http://fortune.com/2018/10/09/taylor-swift-burn-merchandise-instagram-protests/
And now we can add Gillette razors to the list: https://www.businessinsider.com/gillette-razor-protest-after-controversial-ad-2019-1
There's also a gigantic list of things they have boycotted since the election: https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-boycott-retailers-sell-trump-products-2017-1
Psychopaths!
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)feeling threatened by the idea that it's being pointed out.
Men who are confident in their masculinity, and acknowledge that toxic masculinity is a problem and don't take it as a personal affront/
Just like white people who acknowledge police brutality, don't take "BLM" as a personal affront. Racist white people don't acknowlege that there is racism, so any mention of it feels like an "attack" on white people as a class.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)but they know, deep in their withered, ashen hearts they know.
That's why they get so touchy when it's shown up for what it is.
uriel1972
(4,261 posts)but I think we might get along...
The second tweet is priceless