Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Baltimike

(4,146 posts) Wed Jan 16, 2019, 01:07 AM Jan 2019

We need to Boycott them...everyone enabling Moscow Mitch

Moscow Mitch's biggest contributors need to be boycotted. They need to KNOW why they're being boycotted, and on down the list of kGOPb enablers who continue to provide aid and comfort to our enemy by abdicating their power to Putin.

Everyone knows what's up at this point.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We need to Boycott them...everyone enabling Moscow Mitch (Original Post) Baltimike Jan 2019 OP

Moscow Mitch Peace06 Jan 2019 #1

welcome to DU...maybe opensecrets? Baltimike Jan 2019 #2

I'm going to start to look. Maybe if there is a swell of voters asking for contributor lists for allgood33 Jan 2019 #3

Peace06

(248 posts)

1. Moscow Mitch

Reply to Baltimike (Original post)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 05:58 AM

Jan 2019

Where can a list of his major contributors be found? I totally agree as do millions of others.
We should begin immediately!

Baltimike

(4,146 posts)

2. welcome to DU...maybe opensecrets?

Reply to Peace06 (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 03:57 PM

Jan 2019

But this is not *just* Moscow Mitch. It's the ones who enable him too

allgood33

(1,584 posts)

3. I'm going to start to look. Maybe if there is a swell of voters asking for contributor lists for

Reply to Peace06 (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 16, 2019, 04:01 PM

Jan 2019

the GOP, they will begin to get our message. We need to know who we are fighting and where the boycotts should start. We should start by asking the RNC for all the information available on contributions to GOP Reps and Senators.

Reply to this discussion