General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTodd Akin, Paul Ryan, and Redefining Rape
from Nick Baumann at Mother Jones: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/08/todd-akin-paul-ryan-redefining-rape
On Sunday, Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.), who is challenging Sen. Claire McCaskill in the Missouri Senate race, used an interview with a local television station to defend his belief that abortion should be illegal even in cases of rape: He claimed that women who are the victims of "legitimate rape" are unlikely to become pregnant. Akin said that the female body has "biological defenses" that prevent rape victims from getting pregnant. (That's not true.) The implication of his position is that if you were raped and became pregnant, you must have actually wanted itit wasn't really rape.
This isn't the first time Akin has expressed fringe views about rape in the context of the abortion debate. Last year, Akin, vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), and most of the House GOP co-sponsored a bill that would have narrowed the already-narrow exceptions to the laws banning federal funding for abortionfrom all cases of rape to cases of "forcible rape."
After I reported on the "forcible rape" language in January 2011, a wave of outcry from abortion-rights, progressive, and women's groups led the Republicans to remove it. But a few months later, in a congressional committee report, Republicans wrote that they believed the bill would continue to have the same effect despite the absence of the "forcible" language.
So why was the "forcible" language so important? Pro-life advocates believed they needed to include the word "forcible" in the law to pre-empt what National Right to Life Committee lobbyist Doug Johnson called a "brazen" effort by Planned Parenthood and other groups to obtain federal funding for abortions for any teenager by (falsely) claiming statutory rape. Abortion rights groups, Johnson warned, wanted to "federally fund the abortion of tens of thousands of healthy babies of healthy moms, based solely on the age of their mothers." Richard Doerflinger, the US Council of Catholic Bishops' top anti-abortion lobbyist, echoed Johnson in congressional testimony, arguing that the "forcible" language was "an effort on the part of the sponsors to prevent the opening of a very broad loophole for federally funded abortions for any teenager." Planned Parenthood flatly denied having a plan to open up such a loophole.
The idea that women who are "legitimate" rape victims can't get pregnant has currency in some corners of the fringe right. Akin embraces it. Does he embrace the conspiracy theory about the need for the "forcible rape" language, too?
read: http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/08/todd-akin-paul-ryan-redefining-rape
Todd Arkin, Paul Ryan and the very real war on women
Two words that should never be used together in the same sentence: legitimate and rape. But thats the way Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.) chose to speak about the sensitive topic that has impacted millions of women in the United States in an interview with a local television station Sunday.
____ Akin and Ryan were the original co-sponsors of the controversial bill H.R. 3, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, which initially included language which changed the definition of rape to forcible rape, until public pressure forced the bills supporters to remove that unacceptable and narrow definition. As I wrote previously, Paul Ryan is not just anti-choice, his anti-choice views are extreme and just plain bad for all women.
Linking Ryan to Akin and the idea that there is such a thing as legitimate rape based on pseudo-science and folklore is something that needs to be done before the upcoming election. While Team Romney attempted to create distance with Akin, saying that both Romney and Ryan disagree with his statements, there was nothing in their statement that said they condemn his remarks as hurtful to victims. There was also nothing in Team Romneys statement that pointed out that what Akin said about pregnancies resulting from rape being rare is just flat-out wrong.
Ryan was against abortion in all cases including rape until Team Romneys statement . . .
read: http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/the_rumble/2012/08/todd-arkin-paul-ryan-and-the-very-real-war-on-women
Ryan and Akin
ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)is at http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/112/house/1/292 , along with links to complete texts of all versions of the bill.
All 175 votes against the bill were cast by Democrats, and all Republicans (except 6 who did not vote) voted in favor of HR 3, the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act".
One Democrat (Gabby Giffords) did not vote, and 17 Democrats voted with the Republicans to pass the bill.