General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLegal Scholars to Trump: No, You Cannot Declare Emergency to Build Wall That Public Doesn't Want
Legal Scholars to Trump: No, You Cannot Declare Emergency to Build Wall That Public Doesn't Want and Isn't Needed"The American constitution does not contemplate such presidential unilateralism."
by Jon Queally, staff writer Published on Saturday, January 05, 2019 by Common Dreams
"I can do it if I want," Trump declared Friday. "We can call a national emergency because of the security of our country. We can do it. I haven't done it. I may do it."
Calling Trump's demand for the wall "constitutionally illegitimate" in an op-ed for the Guardian in the wake of the president's "bizarre" press conference outside the White House, Harvard law professor Lawrence Lessig argued that no reading of the nation's governing document "would ever uphold the view that a president can stop the functioning of government, to insist upon a program unsupported by the public or unrequired by the constitution."
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/01/05/legal-scholars-trump-no-you-cannot-declare-emergency-build-wall-public-doesnt-want
duforsure
(11,885 posts)Claiming a huge majority of the American people are criminals because they don't want the stupid wall, and the crime rate of Americans is much higher than the crime rate is from immigrants in this country.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)lower crime rate for immigrants. And that money was allocated last year for Fat Nixon's vanity project and that only a fraction of it was spent. Wasteful!
shanny
(6,709 posts)or get yelled at by limpballs and the coultergeist
NCjack
(10,279 posts)The Majority Leader of the Senate has failed to defend our constitutional government and must be removed. If Mueller has evidence that is sufficient for an indictment, he must produce it now.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)"No you can't, you lying sniveling, whiney little republican brat. You're worse than your father, and he was fabulously foul." - Mom
* aka republican Draft-Dodger-in-Chief
Poiuyt
(18,131 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Maybe like the CEO of the company that cut down all of the trees in The Lorax?
BootinUp
(47,201 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Yes, I see the resemblance.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,496 posts)ordering polish for his golden throne. Man has absolutely no knowledge of government other than how to hustle money out of it for himself. He did it to New York for decades, so this is just a new grifting gig to him.
.... ....I'm really curious as to what he thinks his end game here really is........
90-percent
(6,829 posts)a lifetime of getting away with everything, the Presidency is just another grift. He does not have the brain power to understand how much trouble he is in.
He's repeating talking points that have their source in the Kremlin!!!!!! I think what's left of our republic raped system can inflict justice on this best Manchurian Candidate in history!
His crimes are well out of reach of the can't look backward got to look forward doctrine.
They are in the lets get the guillotine out of storage arena.
-90% Jimmy
We live in the most interesting times in my 64 year old lifetime. A life time of constant fear and indignation for my government is getting tiresome. As a nation steeped in decent people we cannot allow this to stand!
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,496 posts)Who could ever dream things could get this much worse.
I just can't fathom that he doesn't see that his game is done. The only thing I can figure is that he has surrounded himself with 100% yes-men that keep him walled-off, and that he rarely watches anything but Fox.
I fear that those yes-men that we didn't elect are really controlling this entire administration. And, who knows who is controlling those yes-men?
Perhaps it shouldn't be such a surprise. It was known that W's White House was basically controlled by daily email exchanges with Heritage Foundation, and probably American Enterprise and others as well.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)If the defenses of the constitution have broken down it's just old paper. At that point it comes down to whoever wields the most power and has the best physical defenses. Would that be Trump? The military? Without the Senate, the president and the SC to join the House in defense of the constitution, there is no constitution.
The president and the Senate are defying the constitution. Half the SC may also join them.
So....?
meadowlander
(4,408 posts)Can't imagine where this is going.
lindysalsagal
(20,747 posts)why would he suddenlly give one crap what "legal scholars" think?