Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,390 posts)
Sat Jan 5, 2019, 04:06 PM Jan 2019

Vox - Conservatives won't trade the wall for anything good because they know it's a bad idea.

Interesting article that answers the question of why there is no deal to be had: Because it is a stupid idea and Republicans are not going to offer anything worthwhile in exchange for it. Higher taxes on the rich? Nope. Protection for Dreamers? Nope. Thus, despite false equivalency being pushed in the media, Republicans really just want a shutdown and appreciate the cover the media is giving them by pushing a false equivalency.

https://www.vox.com/2018/12/28/18158873/wall-shutdown-trump-dreamers-deal

Spending billions of dollars to build hundreds of miles of additional walling — or “steel slats” or whatever you want to call it — on the US-Mexico border is a bad idea. That’s a critical, underrated feature of the current standoff that has led President Trump to partially shut down the government.

After all, if the president of the United States wants a $5 billion appropriation for a pet project that’s important to him personally and partially fulfills a campaign promise, then he ought to be able to get it. And the time-honored way to get it is to give congressional skeptics something else in exchange. That’s how the system has worked ever since Alexander Hamilton got James Madison to back federal assumption of state debts in exchange for locating the nation’s capital on the banks of the Potomac River.

But back at the beginning of the year, when it seemed as though a compromise involving wall money and a path to citizenship for DREAMers was in the works, it was immigration hardliners in Trump’s own administration who scuttled the deal. That’s certainly their prerogative, but it underscores the core truth of this standoff: Immigration hardliners themselves don’t think the wall is especially useful or important in the real world. If they really wanted a wall, they would go get a wall by offering something — it wouldn’t even necessarily have to be immigration-related — in exchange for it. But since they know the wall is a bad idea, they won’t trade it for anything. Yet precisely because the wall idea is so bad, Democrats, rightly, aren’t going to give it away for free.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vox - Conservatives won't trade the wall for anything good because they know it's a bad idea. (Original Post) TomCADem Jan 2019 OP
$5 billion isn't even close to enough to actually build it, either htuttle Jan 2019 #1
If Republicans Actually Agreed to Address Dreamers... TomCADem Jan 2019 #2
What if we allocated $5 billion for a wall but say work can't begin until 2021 Buckeyeblue Jan 2019 #3
Good play. nt Blue_true Jan 2019 #4

htuttle

(23,738 posts)
1. $5 billion isn't even close to enough to actually build it, either
Sat Jan 5, 2019, 04:20 PM
Jan 2019

Figuring it would cost at least as much as a freeway per mile, it would cost at least $11 billion.

Where does the $5 billion number even come from? How could Pence have offered $2.5 billion at one point last week? Do they even have a plan? Estimates? Surveying? Building something like that 'for reals' would take at least a decade, planning to bidding to completion.

This isn't even about a real wall, I agree.


TomCADem

(17,390 posts)
2. If Republicans Actually Agreed to Address Dreamers...
Sat Jan 5, 2019, 04:22 PM
Jan 2019

...in exchange for the wall, Limbaugh, Coulter and the rest of the Republican racist base would go ballistic. There is no deal, because even Republicans know that the wall is not worth squat.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
3. What if we allocated $5 billion for a wall but say work can't begin until 2021
Sat Jan 5, 2019, 04:37 PM
Jan 2019

And we put a clause in the bill that states whoever is president in 2021 can unilaterally kill the wall and spend the $5 billion on some other measure to deter illegal immigration.

If 45 pushes back, we just ask if he isn't confident about his reelection chances.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vox - Conservatives won't...