Jill ABRAMSON gets Foxified critique-ing NYT, SHITLER loves it, Jill replies:

[UTUSN]

**********QUOTE*********

https://www.mediaite.com/online/jill-abramson-fires-back-at-trump-for-using-her-comments-to-bash-the-new-york-times/
.... (Some of her original critical comments about the NYT, as quoted by Faux's Howard KURTZ: ) “Though Baquet said publicly he didn’t want the Times to be the opposition party, his news pages were unmistakably anti-Trump,” Abramson writes, adding that she believes the same is true of the Washington Post. “Some headlines contained raw opinion, as did some of the stories that were labeled as news analysis.”

However, Abramson gave statements to the AP and Politico saying that Kurtz took her “totally out of context” and that “his article is an attempt to Foxify my book, which is full of praise for The Times and The Washington Post and their coverage of Trump.”

(So then, natch, SHITLER bandied her quote about, to which she answered: )

Link to tweet

********UNQUOTE******

[TreasonousBastard]

1. Eh? A bias toward truth and reality would naturally be anti-Trump, so what's the point?

[UTUSN]

2. My questions for her:

1) How not to expect that any piece or passage that could be mined from the context for potential positivity towards SHITLER and would be funneled to him to be used by him as validating him?!1

And 2) her tweet about reading-her-book is sarcasm, ain't it?!1