Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere's a Reason Many Voters Have Negative Views of Warren--But the Press Won't Tell You Why
By Peter Beinart in The Atlantic
These observations are factually correct. But they also help create a false narrative. Mentioning the rights attacks on Warren plus her low approval ratings while citing her very liberal record and the controversy surrounding her alleged Native American heritage implies a causal relationship between these facts. Warren is a lefty who has made controversial ancestral claims. Ergo, Republicans attack her, and many Americans dont like her very much.
But that equation is misleading. The better explanation for why Warren attracts disproportionate conservative criticism, and has disproportionately high disapproval ratings, has nothing to do with her progressive economic views or her dalliance with DNA testing. Its that shes a woman.
As Ive noted before, womens ambition provokes a far more negative reaction than mens. For a 2010 article in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, two Yale professors, Victoria Brescoll and Tyler Okimoto, showed identical fictional biographies of two state senatorsone male and one femaleto participants in a study. When they added quotations to the biographies that characterized each as ambitious and possessing a strong will to power, the male state senator grew more popular. But the female state senator not only lost support among both women and men, but also provoked moral outrage.
The past decade of American politics has illustrated Brescoll and Okimotos findings again and again. During the 2012 campaign, Republicans attacked Nancy Pelosi in television commercials seven times as frequently as they attacked her Democratic Senate counterpart, Harry Reid. In 2016, the disparity was three to one. Pelosis detractors sometimes chalk up her unpopularity to her liberalism and her hometown of San Francisco. But Reids successor as the Democratic Senate leader, Charles Schumer, a liberal from Brooklyn, is far less unpopular than Pelosiand far less targeted by the GOP.
But that equation is misleading. The better explanation for why Warren attracts disproportionate conservative criticism, and has disproportionately high disapproval ratings, has nothing to do with her progressive economic views or her dalliance with DNA testing. Its that shes a woman.
As Ive noted before, womens ambition provokes a far more negative reaction than mens. For a 2010 article in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, two Yale professors, Victoria Brescoll and Tyler Okimoto, showed identical fictional biographies of two state senatorsone male and one femaleto participants in a study. When they added quotations to the biographies that characterized each as ambitious and possessing a strong will to power, the male state senator grew more popular. But the female state senator not only lost support among both women and men, but also provoked moral outrage.
The past decade of American politics has illustrated Brescoll and Okimotos findings again and again. During the 2012 campaign, Republicans attacked Nancy Pelosi in television commercials seven times as frequently as they attacked her Democratic Senate counterpart, Harry Reid. In 2016, the disparity was three to one. Pelosis detractors sometimes chalk up her unpopularity to her liberalism and her hometown of San Francisco. But Reids successor as the Democratic Senate leader, Charles Schumer, a liberal from Brooklyn, is far less unpopular than Pelosiand far less targeted by the GOP.
Short summary: Yes, it's the misogyny. On all sides.
Posted in GD because hell, it ain't exactly news, is it.
wearily,
Bright
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1269 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (27)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There's a Reason Many Voters Have Negative Views of Warren--But the Press Won't Tell You Why (Original Post)
TygrBright
Jan 2019
OP
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,632 posts)1. It sure isn't exactly news, my dear TygrBright...
It's just the same old shit.
I'm glad you posted this article from The Atlantic. I hadn't really realized just how pervasive this view is. And oh my gawd, it sucks.
RockCreek
(739 posts)2. I wonder how being a woman of color affects this
The same?
Less?
More?
I hope that somehow it is less, and that could help us get through this sexist mess.
Autumn
(45,106 posts)4. AOC gets attacked a lot. By both sides.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)3. I'm with Warren. I'm with Ocasio-Cortez. I'm with Pelosi.
And I'm with any other Dem that DUers are trying to drag down right now.