Dude is just rambling on and on. He's having a serious meltdown.lol

[SummerSnow]

CNN and MSNBC

[Eliot Rosewater]

1. I cant help but think every time this traitor is on TV and being given all this attention

how what he deserves is to be on a street corner whining.

But for many many millions of us who think he is just wonderful, SICK

[niyad]

5. he deserves to be in prison for all his crimes.

[jcgoldie]

2. And then what happens?

Nothing. That's what I've thought about his last two press conferences... well this crazy motherfucker has gone off the rails and there will be repercussions... then nothing.

[cwydro]

3. For those of us not watching tv, can you give a hint?

I suppose “dude” is rump? Is he tweeting, yelling, what?

[HipChick]

4. Rambling fucking idiot.

[SummerSnow]

7. He is at the White House rambling at the big table with the GOP about everything, and I mean

everything. Its a meltdown of epic proportions. He's ranting cause tomorrow Pelosi is Speaker of the House

[chelsea0011]

13. This one is hard to explain. He is talking non stop about whatever is in his head at the time.

He talked about sitting at a table of generals. Beautiful generals. Not Tom Cruise types. Really....30 minutes of this stuff.

[yardwork]

16. He said beautiful generals?

[monmouth4]

6. He knows tomorrow will be all about Nancy and the Dems. He's getting in his face time..n/t

[no_hypocrisy]

8. Just figured it out.

Trump wants to re-play the scenario on December 11 with Pelosi and Schumer in the Oval Office, -- and THIS time, he'll WIN!

[TeamPooka]

18. I've run the scenario simulation through the computer 5 million times...

Trump never wins.

[rickford66]

9. Has he mentioned the strawberries yet ?

[GreatCaesarsGhost]

10. "not enough cash in the tri-state area" to pay Iran!

Had to use foreign currency!

[LiberalFighter]

11. How much shit is he saying that should not be rambled about?

[nolabear]

12. Swan song.

He knows it's over.

[VOX]

14. This is a classic example of one of "those posts."

Of the kind that provides no link, no context, no explanation. This aggravating phenomenon was discussed thoroughly in detail here on DU just a few days ago.

We’ve got to help each other out when posting. Not all of us are locked into the same thought-process (or watching/reading the same media).

Just ONE sentence by the OP regarding the genesis of the post would be sufficient. ONE sentence!

[chelsea0011]

15. History is not a strong subject for him, is it? WOW. Just WOW

[JHB]

17. Ummm... Orange Dude or some flavor of Flunky Dude?

Can't watch at the moment.

[TeamPooka]

19. He can ramble in this meeting with republicans but in the meeting with Democrats they will

call him out on his bullshit now