General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan or will someone please explain the issues surrounding "Country A" that Mueller wants info from?
What did I miss? For what country would the US go to such extreme lengths to protect from having to turn over information needed by Mueller for his investigation?
JT45242
(2,280 posts)Most pundits have speculated that country A is:
1. Russia. Bank records would show contribution to campaign,NRA, or Facebook buys.
2.Saudi Arabia. Bank records would show MSB has influence on Trump.
3. UAE. Again money that would show Trouble owes money or favors to another foreign power.
4. Turkey. This might explain the weird caving in to demands to not protect the Kurds who were the bests ISIS fighters.(I think that was done to keep Erdogan from spilling info about Kushner having knowledge of the Kashoggi murder).
But the basic premise is the same. Follow the money because this is a RICO investigation.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)Is it about trump's finances?
Who knows?
mucifer
(23,550 posts)ruled against Mueller in this case. I haven't hear anyone else say that. I have only heard that Roberts asked for more information from Mueller and Mueller quickly replied.
I hope the Politico reporter was wrong. Wait and see. Wait Wait Wait. Oy vey.
onenote
(42,714 posts)for failing to comply with a Mueller subpoena. The stay is temporary and does not represent a ruling on the merits challenge to the contempt citation and underlying subpoena. Roberts was the justice issuing the stay because he is the justice assigned to handle emergency requests arising from decisions by the DC Circuit. The temporary stay is not that unusual and doesn't necessarily indicate how Roberts, or the full court if the matter is referred to the full court, will rule on the merits.
mucifer
(23,550 posts)Until then, we can only wonder at the remarkable circumstance that the chief justice of the United States has personally intervened, at the request of a foreign government through its corporate entity, in Muellers investigation. Only two days before, court observers noted that in a high-profile asylum decision, Roberts had sided with his four liberal colleagues against the Trump administration. Many observers took that as evidence that Roberts was carefully seeking to preserve the courts institutional neutrality, integrity and balance.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/12/30/supreme-court-john-roberts-robert-mueller-investigation-223569
kentuck
(111,103 posts)then it goes back down to the lower Court. I think it was an Appeals Court and they ruled unanimously in favor of Mueller? Did I hear that wrong?
onenote
(42,714 posts)He wasn't intervening as Chief Justice. He was handling the motion because he is the Justice assigned to hear motions with respect to DC Circuit decisions.
If the decision below had come from the third or fifth circuits, Alito would have handled it. If it come from the 7th Circuit, it would have been Kavanaugh, if from the 8th it would have been Gorsuch, and if from the 11th it would have been Thomas.
getagrip_already
(14,764 posts)Most people don'r realize it, but the US Gov't actually owns a number of businesses. Is it possible all the secrecy is because it's a US owned Corporation?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Government-owned_companies_of_the_United_States
kentuck
(111,103 posts)Now called the Trump International Hotel?