General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJerry Falwell Jr.: 'You don't choose a president based on how moral they are'
Evangelical leader Jerry Falwell Jr. said voters dont choose a president based on a candidate's morals, saying that leaders should be elected based on policies.
In an interview with The Washington Post published Tuesday, the Liberty University president was pressed about his support for President Trump and asked whether it was "hypocritical" for evangelical leaders to support "a leader who has advocated violence and who has committed adultery and lies often?"
"When Jesus said were all sinners, he really meant all of us, everybody. I dont think you can choose a president based on their personal behavior," Falwell said.
"Because even if you choose the one that you think is the most decent lets say you decide Mitt Romney. Nobody could be a more decent human being, better family man. But there might be things that hes done that we just dont know about, Falwell continued. "So you dont choose a president based on how good they are; you choose a president based on what their policies are. Thats why I dont think its hypocritical."
Falwell has been a vocal supporter of the president since the campaign trail, inviting Trump to speak at Liberty's 2017 commencement ceremony.
He told the Post that there is nothing Trump could do that would endanger his support.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/423426-jerry-falwell-jr-you-dont-choose-a-president-based-on-how-good-they
kimbutgar
(21,157 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)When President Clinton was accused, morality ranked much higher on Falwell's list.
VMA131Marine
(4,139 posts)When a Democrat becomes President in 2021.
People like Falwell and Franklin Graham make me sick with their hypocrisy.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,007 posts)Pool boy schpool boy!
msongs
(67,413 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,457 posts)Volaris
(10,272 posts)Which actually meant 'his own Power.'.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)of character, which is not necessarily about morality, but it appears Trump has none.
And then there is ethics- not quite the same as morality, but Trump has none of that, either.
Now Falwell the Lesser may be concerning himself with sexual mores, in which case he's right-- one's sexual history has little to do with policy. However, one's character and fundamental ethical system has a lot to do with policy.
Bottom line, though, he's just making excuses for Trump.
C_U_L8R
(45,003 posts)This sinister snakeoil salesman is promoting the worst of humanity.
kentuck
(111,101 posts)Good fruit cannot come from a bad tree.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Fuck you Jerry, you hypocritical, slimy piece of shit!
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Pick and choose your parts and twist and turn them into your desired meaning.
Girard442
(6,075 posts)In the Era of Trump, the Evangelicals have shamelessly embraced naked greed and lust for power.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Poor people are MORE likely to perform acts of charity than rich people with no empathy for the needy.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Falwell bases his on bronze age religion and 16th century Calvanism. To me, that amounts to amorality at this point in history. He has no point that can be taken seriously. Neither he nor Trump have any morality that serves the good of humankind.
Initech
(100,080 posts)Remember when they made George W Bush out to be the more moral candidate? Now they're saying that it's not about morals? Are they fucking kidding me? Pick a side and stick with it!