Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 08:16 PM Jan 2019

Like Fruit, Vegetables, and Almonds? Scientists Have Bad News.



Like Fruit, Vegetables, and Almonds? Scientists Have Bad News.
A new study finds that the main source of water for our fresh produce could dry up within our lifetimes.
Tom Philpott
January 1, 2019 6:00 AM


So far, this winter has brought ample snows to the Sierra Nevada, the spine of mountains that runs along California’s eastern flank. That’s good news for Californians, because the range’s melted snow provides 60 percent of the state’s water supply. Anyone in the United States who likes fruit, vegetables, and nuts should rejoice, too, because water flowing from the Sierra’s streams and rivers is the main irrigation source for farms in the arid Central Valley, which churns out nearly a quarter of the food consumed here.

But the Sierra snowpack has shown an overall declining trend for decades—most dramatically during the great California drought of 2012-2016—and will dwindle further over the next several decades, a growing body of research suggests. In the latest, published in the peer-reviewed Geophysical Research Letters journal, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory researchers lay out what they call a “future of consistent low-to-no snowpack.” In other words, a new normal wherein the robust snowpack developing this year would be an almost unthinkable anomaly.

To get a picture of what water planners can expect in the coming decades, the team focused on the headwaters feeding 10 major reservoirs designed to capture snowmelt from the Sierra each year. Using averages from 1985 to 2005 as a baseline, they applied nine different climate models. They assumed global greenhouse gas emissions would continue rising at present rates —that is, a “business as usual” scenario with no effective global deal to cut greenhouse emissions and no major technological breakthroughs.

The results: By mid-century (2039–2059), the average annual snowpack will fall by 54.4 percent compared to the late-20th century baseline. By the time today’s teens are in their 70s, it will be 79.3 percent beneath the old standard. To analyze massive amounts of water, planners think in acre-feet—the amount needed to submerge an acre of land by one foot. At the end of the last century, the Sierra Nevada captured an average of 8.76 million acre-feet. By mid-century, they project, the average will fall to 4 million acre-feet; and by century’s end, 1.81 million acre-feet.

The Central Valley Project—a federally run network of dams, reservoirs, and canals that waters about a third California’s irrigated farmland and provides water and electricity to millions of urban users, all from snow melt—could become a what economists called a “stranded asset” in such a scenario: a multi-billion dollar public investment that lacks sufficient water to perform its tasks.

more...

https://www.motherjones.com/food/2019/01/like-fruit-vegetables-and-almonds-scientists-have-bad-news/
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Like Fruit, Vegetables, and Almonds? Scientists Have Bad News. (Original Post) babylonsister Jan 2019 OP
why, when handmade34 Jan 2019 #1
The Central Valley supplies a lot of domestic foods, often off season to the rest of the US. NutmegYankee Jan 2019 #2
Saudi land purchases in California and Arizona fuel debate over water rights StarryNite Jan 2019 #3
and... handmade34 Jan 2019 #4
Maybe it's time repurpose the Alaska pipeline FakeNoose Jan 2019 #5
The volume wouldn't even come close NickB79 Jan 2019 #7
California has proposed taking water from Alaska and Canada in the past ... eppur_se_muova Jan 2019 #12
Plenty of water here in N. Ala. House of Roberts Jan 2019 #6
Grow your own. It's better than lawns NickB79 Jan 2019 #8
Yep MissB Jan 2019 #11
The "real" reason for the, as the Repub's put it...."train to nowhere" Xolodno Jan 2019 #9
I have a low-tech vision. silverweb Jan 2019 #10

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
1. why, when
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 09:21 PM
Jan 2019

there is an article about water shortage in California... almonds and fruit are usually to culprit... animal agriculture uses more



"California Governor Jerry Brown has been talking tough about California’s growing drought crisis. In January he declared a state of emergency saying, “I’m calling on all Californians to conserve water in every way possible,” and just last week he announced that we are “in a new era” of drought severity. But while his rhetoric was rightfully alarming, his solution, a mandatory 25% reduction in household water consumption,

overlooks the largest users of water: animal factory farms.
"

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
2. The Central Valley supplies a lot of domestic foods, often off season to the rest of the US.
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 09:29 PM
Jan 2019

We can grow the animals anywhere. The almonds? Not so much.

StarryNite

(9,446 posts)
3. Saudi land purchases in California and Arizona fuel debate over water rights
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 09:35 PM
Jan 2019

"Almarai Co. bought land in January that roughly doubled its holdings in California's Palo Verde Valley, an area that enjoys first dibs on water from the Colorado River. The company also acquired a large tract near Vicksburg, Ariz., becoming a powerful economic force in a region that has fewer well-pumping restrictions than other parts of the state.

The purchases totaling about 14,000 acres enable the Saudis to take advantage of farm-friendly U.S. water laws. The acquisitions have also rekindled debate over whether a patchwork of regulations and court rulings in the West favors farmers too heavily, especially those who grow thirsty, low-profit crops such as alfalfa at a time when cities are urging people to take shorter showers, skip car washes and tear out grass lawns."

[link:https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-saudi-arabia-alfalfa-20160329-story.html|

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
4. and...
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 09:39 PM
Jan 2019

older article, but relevant...

Farmers are 'exporting water' to China...
While historic winter storms have battered much of the US, California is suffering its worst drought on record. So why is America's most valuable farming state using billions of gallons of water to grow hay - specifically alfalfa - which is then shipped to China?

FakeNoose

(32,645 posts)
5. Maybe it's time repurpose the Alaska pipeline
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 09:42 PM
Jan 2019

Bring fresh drinking water down to the western states from Canada and Alaska.
I think they have to repair the leaks in the pipes first though.

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
7. The volume wouldn't even come close
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 10:05 PM
Jan 2019

People don't realize just how much water is in an acre-foot, and how many acre-feet they use every year for irrigation. The scale of the problem is truly mind-blowing.

We'd need a hundred Alaska pipelines to bring in sufficient volume of fresh water.

eppur_se_muova

(36,269 posts)
12. California has proposed taking water from Alaska and Canada in the past ...
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 11:34 PM
Jan 2019

... it was NOT a popular idea with Alaskans and Canadians. And the costs of the project would have been horrendous.

House of Roberts

(5,177 posts)
6. Plenty of water here in N. Ala.
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 09:53 PM
Jan 2019

It rains every third day, or sooner.

I managed to clean my leaves on Dec. 26 only because it held off for a few days in a row, then it rained again on the 27th. First time in years I got them up in the same year they fell.

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
8. Grow your own. It's better than lawns
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 10:07 PM
Jan 2019

Vast chemical-doused lawns mowed by huge riding mowers need to be outlawed.

MissB

(15,810 posts)
11. Yep
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 10:34 PM
Jan 2019

Which works fine for those of us that have houses and land. And maybe a green thumb too

I’m adding 2-3 edible perennials a year. Sometimes a fruit tree, sometimes a veggie. This year it’s kiwi, evergreen huckleberry and asparagus (I already have asparagus; I’m expanding my bed significantly.) Last year it was a fig tree and goumi bushes. I also buy open pollinated seeds if I can.

I grow most of my veggies from seed. I’m hoping for a greenhouse in the next couple of years. For now I grow winter greens in the basement under lights until I have to start the summer seedlings.

Xolodno

(6,395 posts)
9. The "real" reason for the, as the Repub's put it...."train to nowhere"
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 10:19 PM
Jan 2019

...That being the High Speed Rail project.

Real Estate in SoCal is too expensive and will continue to be so. People keep moving further and further out....eventually, you will get people refusing to take a job out there because of the high cost of living.

A high speed train however, makes that manageable. People can commute from Bakersfield to LA in a reasonable amount of time (and people already do this trek everyday).

Add to that, with decreasing water supplies, there is less water for farmers. So how do you get them to stop farming? They absolutely refuse to believe there is less water and all we need is more water storage. Buy them out, build affordable housing for the growing population the train brings. Homeowners do not use as much water as farmers.

Then capture the water used by homeowners, recycle....and send it to the remaining viable farms.

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
10. I have a low-tech vision.
Tue Jan 1, 2019, 10:32 PM
Jan 2019

It's been at least a year since I first read about tribes in Africa and students in South America using hydrophilic nets to capture moisture from the air for potable water. One of the things I want to do myself is make a prototype to test it out for personal gardening and even collection of drinking water.

The vision I have (and with drought conditions worsening in the West and Southwest, it will soon become essential to try this on a commercial scale) is of rows of these nets alongside rows of crops. That way, atmospheric moisture collection would water them, dramatically reducing any need for irrigation as we now know it.

Pie in the sky? I really don't think so. There's no good reason not to try it and the process should be readily scalable. Atmospheric water harvesting should be part of a multi-pronged approach to offset clean water shortages occurring around the world.

Here's just one of many good articles available on the subject:
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/8/17441496/fog-harvesting-water-scarcity-environment-crisis

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Like Fruit, Vegetables, a...