General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Sanders Institute International Panel somehow failed to include
any people of color, according to some tweeters. Is this true?
Link to tweet
@mgranville1
· Nov 30, 2018
Replying to @mgranville1
Bernie in this clip shows you that he learned nothing g from 2016. He talks about breaking down silos in the progressive movement - with not one person of color represented on the panel.
@mgranville1
Bernie continues to say that all coalitions must work to understand the pain and suffering in rural (ie white) America - that its something Dems dont understand and why Trump elected. No mention of racism. Or discrimination of any kind.
Link to tweet
dlk
(11,572 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Merlot
(9,696 posts)We don't know anything about this panel, where it was and who comprises it and why.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)I wonder if the OP will edit and or delete their OP now that they've been shown those tweets are total bullshit.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)I think we're all used to misguided Bernie hit pieces by now.
melman
(7,681 posts)Because it's obviously impossible to check if things are true before posting.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)were objecting to not being included on the panel.
yardwork
(61,671 posts)The OP is about the panel, not the participants.
But thanks anyway.
yardwork
(61,671 posts)sheshe2
(83,815 posts)sheshe2
(83,815 posts)and attendees on the panels.
violetpastille
(1,483 posts)What has Susan Sarandon got to say about Civil Rights, Human Dignity and Immigration I wonder?
(Not really)
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)jmowreader
(50,561 posts)It does absolutely no good to tell people you're going to "bring an industry back" when no one wants what they make. (Imagine Trump in 1910, two years after the introduction of the Model T Ford: "We're going to bring horseshoes back!"
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)over the past month or so. It used to be "Our Revolution", right? Are they one and the same? Or two different things?
Cha
(297,378 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Just to be clear, I voted for Hillary Clinton in the general election. In fact, I've never voted for any Green Party candidate for any office in my life.
But in a thread that's attacking Bernie over an alleged lack of diversity, it does some odd to see an attack on Cornel West's participation. I didn't agree with West and Sarandon and others who supported Stein. The difference is that I don't judge an event by whether it rigorously excludes anyone who might disagree with me.
sheshe2
(83,815 posts)We do not support third party voters. West and Sarandon did.
betsuni
(25,558 posts)If he runs for president or supports those running for president, his connections with third party supporters like West and Sarandon hurts him because anyone who thinks Democrats are worse than Republicans is nutty. This criticism can only help Sanders be a stronger candidate and more likable.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Bernie is willing to reach out to people who didn't vote for Clinton. You see that as a weakness. I see it as a strength.
Obviously, there are some Green Party diehards. I don't think Jill Stein herself, for example, will do anything in 2020 other than support the Green candidate, be it herself or someone else. But that doesn't mean that we should write off more than a million people who voted for her in 2016. Many of them can be won over. Trump is working hard on convincing them that, as those of us on this board already knew, Republicans are much worse than Democrats.
George W. Bush performed the same service. The result was that, from 2000 to 2004, Nader's vote plummeted. His own running mate from 2000, Winona LaDuke, endorsed Kerry in 2004. We can hope for similar repentance among many Stein voters. Ostracizing and vilifying them, however, is not the strategy that will maximize the Democratic vote in 2020.
betsuni
(25,558 posts)Anyone who thinks Hillary Clinton, a bland bleeding heart liberal lawyer, is the same as a Republican is a fucking idiot.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)You don't even deign to address the closest historical parallel. In the 2000 election, there was some complacency on the left after eight years of a Democrat in the White House. The Green Party candidate was therefore able to appeal to many a "fucking idiot" by dismissing the differences between Democrats and Republicans.
The same thing happened in 2016.
So what happened in the next election? In 2004, a Republican had been in office for four years. His performance in office made it much more obvious than it had been that there was an enormous human cost to Republican electoral success. The result was that the vote for no-hopers on the left plummeted. (Nader ran as an independent. Even if we combine his votes with those cast for the Green Party candidate, David Cobb, their total was far below what Nader had pulled in 2000. Nader plus Cobb drew 0.48% of the popular vote in 2004, compared to Nader's 2.74% in 2000.)
Of the 1.5 million people who voted for Stein in 2016, there are surely many who, like most of the Nader 2000 voters, can be won over. Or do you think that the fucking idiots of 2016 are somehow more idiotic than the fucking idiots of 2000?
And, by the way, is Winona LaDuke a fucking idiot?
Autumn
(45,118 posts)Commons member, and Irelands leading economic commentator, I gather International means people from other countries along with Bernie and some white American Economist. The speakers at the Gathering who are POC includes Carmen Cruz, Shaun King, Nina Turner, Micheael Tubbs, Radhika Balakrishnan, Dr. Cornel West, Danny Glover, Chirlane McCray, and Joseph Geevarghese and some white people.
Bernie really needs to get off everybody's fucking lawn.
The last sentence is pure sarcasm.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Note there were numerous U.S. based attendees in that list with international experience in their jobs/roles in attendence as well.
https://sandersinstitutegathering.org/speakers/
Carmen Yulin Cruz
Mayor, San Juan Puerto Rico; Fellow, The Sanders Institute
Yanis Varoufakis
Economist & Former Greek Minister of Finance; Fellow, The Sanders Institute
Ada Colau
Mayor, Barcelona
Niki Ashton
Member of the Canadian House of Commons
Dr. Radhika Balakrishnan
UN Development Program & Global Advisory Council
James Zogby
Founder & President, Arab American Institute; Fellow, The Sanders Institutr
Dr. Hosnieh Djafari Marbini
Anaesthetist at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
"Hosnieh Djafari-Marbini is a Labour City Councillor, ethnic minority officer for her Constituency Labour Party, and a trade union branch Political Officer. Hosnieh campaigns on the NHS, inequalities and refugee rights. Hosniehs fifteen-year career in the NHS, and low-income countries has been heavily focused on communication, partnership-working and education. This has included initiating and organizing education series for many institutions including University of Oxford and Malawi School of Anaesthesia, and strategic planning with the Oxford University Global Surgery group and Asylum Welcome.
The ward Hosnieh represents is one of the most deprived in her city of Oxford. This together with her own background of having arrived in the UK aged thirteen with almost no English as the daughter of a refugee, have driven her to help deliver social justice and a greater platform for effective change by marginalized groups in UK society."
David McWilliams
Economist, Broadcaster & Journalist; Fellow, The Sanders Institute
Jo Beardsmore
Co-Founder, UK Uncut; Senior Advisor at the Social Practice
Autumn
(45,118 posts)The "bad" outweigh the "good" I guess.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Autumn
(45,118 posts)Not good enough Bernie.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)The only international member on the panel was Yanis Varoufakis.
Thank you for posting it.
Autumn
(45,118 posts)of course it's being passed around as fact. Tom Watson knows who he's playing to. Almost Trumpian.
Link to tweet
/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1067955264115171328&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2F100211485698
yardwork
(61,671 posts)Autumn
(45,118 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)some of these people. Not if he wants to be considered a candidate by at least some serious Democrats, rather than competing with the Jill Steins for the kind who think Cornel West and Sarandon are voices of wisdom.
This is Mrs. Sanders' organization, though. I do notice several far more respectable names made the list after the initial wingnutty set was publicized. I'm guessing Bernie might have taken action to make that happen.
Autumn
(45,118 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Autumn
(45,118 posts)Link it.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Whatever. Are you saying he's not associated with Sarandon's inclusion among the speakers?
Prove it.
Autumn
(45,118 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)that Hillary would have been more dangerous than Trump, just the one in 2017. And the attendee list if far more worthy of associating with now than initially published.
Autumn
(45,118 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)because it 'feels' true. JUst as so many Onion stories do these days.
JI7
(89,254 posts)it's not a stretch
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Autumn
(45,118 posts)"Hillary was as Dangerous as Trump." Watson knows who he's playing to since that stupid meme is now making the rounds as a fact.
Link to tweet
/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1067955264115171328&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2F%3Fcom%3Dview_post%26forum%3D1002%26pid%3D11502655
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)along with her treatment of Dolores Huerta at the Nevada convention.
Autumn
(45,118 posts)At least I thought so.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)turns out to be. From the Guardian last November 2017:
Not exactly, but I dont mind that quote, she says. I did think she was very, very dangerous. We would still be fracking, we would be at war [if she was president]. It wouldnt be much smoother. Look what happened under Obama that we didnt notice.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/nov/26/susan-sarandon-i-thought-hillary-was-very-dangerous-if-shed-won-wed-be-at-war
She still was standing on her original anti-Democrats position after a year of Trump. So we'll see if a year after that she defends that ground again or avoids it and sticks with issues that need addressing.
Cha
(297,378 posts)Had a look a that 'm. mendoza ferrer' account and it is...uh..interesting.
Autumn
(45,118 posts)progressoid
(49,992 posts)Cha
(297,378 posts)Gothmog
(145,374 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)More races to win
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)This, HE IS A RACIST gambit isn't working..