General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMy medical expenses this year will end up around 40% of my gross income.
That's enough to cause me grave concern.
BECAUSE I have "good" insurance. Premium costs, deductibles, formularies and yearly plan maximums are killing me.
Oh well, at least the border is safe.
Fuck you, trump. Fuck you sideways.
By the time the walking creamsicle is done fucking with the ACA (therefore affecting the entire health insurance market), I'll be bankrupt.
Oh, and to you lurking freepers... I feel I need to remind you that when the new tax plan went into effect, I plugged some numbers into my trusty tax spreadsheet. If you think you will be rolling in cash because of the Trump tax plan...wait until you complete your 1040 in a few months. You're going to have a surprise, and it's not going to be a happy surprise. But at least you made the liberals cry, you stupid motherfuckers.
dhol82
(9,353 posts)He knew from the beginning.
Gonna be a whole shit load of people waking up to a WTF moment for next April.
Jersey Devil
(9,874 posts)With the cap on real estate and state income taxes capped at $10k, a lot of people in NJ are going to lose thousands in deductions. Before I moved from NJ about 2 years ago my real estate taxes alone were over $16k. Together with state income taxes I would have lost well over $20k in deductions. If people didn't prepay like you did they are going to owe quite a bit.
George II
(67,782 posts)They said the standard deduction would be "doubled", but it really wasn't. In 2017 for a married couple it was $12,700, in 2018 it's $24,000 - not double.
But what people weren't told is that along with the increased standard deduction, the personal exemption of $4,050 was eliminated.
So, looking at both combined, for a married couple with two children in 2017 the standard deduction/personal exemption was $28,900 and now it's only $24,000.
That wouldn't be a big thing, but with all the eliminated deductions the net is LOWER than last year. The bottom line is middle class workers will be paying MORE than last year.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)That is a 1000 more per child. At 22% tax rrate that protects $4500 of income. Also the rates have been reduced. At 12% rate the credit increase means even more.
Of course if you have older kids or adult children that are still dependents, then you do get the hit you described.
George II
(67,782 posts)...which is why people on the coasts, who have high real estate taxes and other formerly deductible expenses, will be screwed.
Back when Reagan boasted about his big tax cut, it was a similar manipulation - lowered rates but reduced deductions. The first year it was in place I was unemployed most of the year. I wound up paying MORE that year than the previous year, even though my income was lower.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)I agree with you on the changes to deductions. I think that is part of why the Republican party got wiped out in California.
Fortunately for me my housing expenses are low in my state so I was actually itemizing even before this change. I feel for what happened to those in high cost areas.
George II
(67,782 posts)....there was a late minute compromise and the deduction for medical expenses were left for 2018. But next year that's gone, unless the Democrats can work something out, which is doubtful.
Getting back to the exemption, before this year whether someone itemized or used the standard deduction, they still got the personal exemption (I think it's $4,050). So, if someone has been itemizing anyway, the increased standard deduction means nothing, but a married couple (like myself) will lose that $8,100 reduction in taxable income.
dhol82
(9,353 posts)allgood33
(1,584 posts)people. It ought not take the by surprise but it will because no one is preparing the ill-informed about what is about to hit them.
ooky
(8,924 posts)they have their "guns".
violetpastille
(1,483 posts)erlewyne
(1,115 posts)And I have been screwed a few times. Health insurance sucks.
Now my VA (veterans) is being run out of some golf course in Fla.
violetpastille
(1,483 posts)This absolutely sucks.
ZeroSomeBrains
(638 posts)We need to have some sort of medicare for all system so that people don't have to scrimp and save because of health care expenses.
LovingA2andMI
(7,006 posts)The 80/20 BS, along with Premiums that don't include Deductibles, Co-Insurance and Out of Pocket Maximum costs. We need Medicare for all. PERIOD.
SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)Medicare IS 80/20 unless you buy additional "gap coverage"..
I am 69 and my basic medicare costs me 125.00 a month plus another 99.00 to Kaiser for advantage plan + drugs.. I still pay copays of $20 for office visits $30 for specialists and the drug plan has "tiers" to their deductibles.....
My ss left over is $680 a month..
llmart
(15,542 posts)So when I hear people repeating the mantra of Medicare for all I want to scream. They only pay 80%. If someone needs open heart surgery or any other major surgeries that 20% would bankrupt most people. As you've said, you have to purchase something additional.
area51
(11,913 posts)but I think most people calling for Medicare for All realize that the current form of Medicare isn't enough; what people are calling for is comprehensive Medicare for All. Please take a look at the PNHP link.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,869 posts)Drugs are $6.
Specialist $45
Emergency $80
There is the problem with the donut hole but I don't really understand how that works. I don't have any real medical problems so I never get close to the upper limit.
Two years ago I was in hosital over nite for heart tests.
My part was $110
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)The donut hole is calculated on the retail costs of drugs, not what you pay. So you get to the donut hole faster than you think. Then once you are in it, you are not eligible for any cost assistance so you pay the full retail costs until you escape the hole. It's a killer and I still don't understand why the ACA left it in place this long. I'm waiting for 2020. The House won't cancel that feature.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)Last edited Sun Dec 2, 2018, 12:33 AM - Edit history (1)
$134 a month is automatically taken out of my skimpy SS check. Then I have to pay $225/month for supplemental coverage and an extra $33 for prescription drug coverage that is little more than a discount card. That's before co-pays. Takes a big chunk out of the budget. Medicare for all would be an improvement, but if it copied the present format, it would still be unaffordable for many.
question everything
(47,497 posts)But I had to look for another plan now because of "changes. I ended up with a spreadsheet they had some as low as $0 but did not include medications. Then they had several other plans with $300 or $400 drugs deductible.
llmart
(15,542 posts)You didn't mention what sort of supplemental plan you have, but I have the Plan G medigap and the annual deductible is only $183. It's worth it to get the highest supplemental plan. It costs me $131 per month through AARP. I have the basic drug plan and that's $27.
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)Do some research. You can get the identical supplement plan for much less. I'm paying $140/mo for the G Plan, which is identical to Plan F ... Which is probably what you have. The only difference is You pay the Part B deductible of around $160 a year. Also, if you're paying that much for meds, use the calculator at Medicare.gov to find the cheapest policy that covers all your prescriptions in the lowest tier. If that's Greek to you, there's lots of info online. I hope this helps.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)Plan G costs in my area through United Health Care, which is the cheapest option in my zip code. Anthem is even higher. Costs are regional. Others are fortunate to live in areas where supplementals cost less. My 95 year old mother who lives near me pays a high premium, too.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)My advantage plan with Excellus is $35/mo. I picked out of 5 or 6 options.
Coverage is very good, except 20% copay for any chemo.
Docs are $15, specialists $20-25.
No deductible.. Max out of pocket is i think $6000.
Includes drug plan.
Has 2 dental cleanings..xams. 1 eye xam.. bett3r than last year.
Where i live Excellys is a non-profit, which gelps.
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)It is insanely complex, and I am not looking forward to navigating it. I can't believe the amount of mail that my mom gets with these plans soliciting her to change her coverage.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I have heard of some Excellus plans from friends that are basically nothing at all...
I have been very lucky, so far.
MVP is also here in Up--State NY and also a non-profit. I had MVP since 2008, then switched to Excellus last year.. very similar.....
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)where I do in Southern California you get screwed. My supplemental this year was $225/mo. Next year it goes up to $237. Good luck navigating this stuff. I used a guy online who was very helpful in providing data and helping me get the most bang for the buck.
Nanjeanne
(4,962 posts)and his first infusion of Daratumumab we got a notice that our 20% of one infusion was $31,000. He is supposed to have 16 infusions and then monthly for as long as they continue working.
Thank goodness before he was diagnosed we got a supplemental policy rather than an Advantage one and hopefully the supplement will pay the extra.
But its insane that people are expected to choose programs that may not be good enough if illness strikes. And its doubly insane that taxpayers are paying for the government to subsidize private insurance companies so they can offer low cost Advantage policies. If the government wasnt subsidizing private insurers our money would actually be going for healthcare.
I pray none of you face a devastating illness and realize just how fucked up our system is.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)Southern Calif. in order to get decent coverage you have to shell out big bucks.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)LeftInTX
(25,422 posts)I'm not even eligible for a Medicare supplement. After years of quality group insurance, hubbie's retirement insurance is not affordable.
I'm going with a Medicare Advantage. Going to be much more expensive than group insurance.
Making a decision about Medicare is like buying a house!
pangaia
(24,324 posts)there are 2 pretty good (good ! HA HA) non-profits.. I pay $35 a month this year for good coverage...
llmart
(15,542 posts)LeftInTX
(25,422 posts)I can get a supplement, but only Plan A at very inflated prices. One supplement is $1,000/month. The other is $400/month.
I've been on Medicare since 1995.
llmart
(15,542 posts)I absolutely abhor the way that insurance companies rule our lives nowadays. We need a Congress that will regulate the crap out of them.
LeftInTX
(25,422 posts)The Advantage Plan I'm looking at is a PPO and my docs are all on it. (We've been on PPOs for years) I'm not going to like the drug prices. I'm also going to miss my double insurance.
cpamomfromtexas
(1,247 posts)they didn't get a real tax cut.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,865 posts)for your medical expenses? That's truly horrifying.
Niagara
(7,632 posts)Hang in there, we now have the House and Pelosi fighting for us.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)The biggest kicker is the cost of pharmaceuticals. The Big Pharma companies have Washington locked up. Neither party has done anything about the cost of meds. Big Pharma got that provision in Medicare Part D put in, that prohibits the fed from negotiating drug prices. That provision needs to be removed.
The govt needs to start regulating pharma prices because people are getting sick & dying because they can't afford their meds. It's outrageous. We're paying for the low prices that other countries get, because their govts prevent price gouging for meds.
I don't know how you can afford 40% of your income on medical care. That's horrible. I don't know what I'd do, if that happened to me. I've been lucky so far with my health, and now I can go on Medicare soon. Phew. My deductibles under my ACA policy varied from $4,500 to $6,500 in different years. It was like having catastrophic insurance, except that it wasn't affordable like catastrophic ins. It has been very expensive.
I hope you got good care, though, and your health improves.
If we get back the Senate, it's possible Washington can do something about drug prices. I hope. We'll have to force them, though. And that would be after Trump is dealt with, which is the priority.
Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)US medical care is a bipartisan clusterfuck.
Demsrule86
(68,607 posts)have caused premiums to rise everywhere...and if they are successful with the court case Pre-existing come back for all insurance including employer insurance. The ACA can work with some tweaking and it is all we have and all we may have for many years.
Ms. Toad
(34,076 posts)ck4829
(35,077 posts)cyclonefence
(4,483 posts)And I have good insurance. My husband still works part-time (at age 70); I don't know what we'll do when he can no longer work. And the fucking tax cut? There's $5 more in each paycheck. That'll buy a lot of Victoza.
Vinca
(50,285 posts)They're very reliable and we've never had a problem, even for stuff that has to be kept cold.
That's good to know and worth checking out. Do your doctors have any concerns? Are the brands (for name-brands) the same?
Vinca
(50,285 posts)how sad it was that Americans had to buy drugs necessary to sustain life (insulin) in another country.
LeftInTX
(25,422 posts)The doctor has to support purchase from Canada.. because they will ask why you want a paper script.
Does the doctor research the pharmacy?
The reason I ask, is they worry that scripts will get sent to schiester pharmacies. If the doc is familiar with the pharmacy etc, then they are more likely to provide a paper Rx. (There are "Canadian" pharmacies that pedal counterfeit drugs. They aren't real pharmacies, but middle men who are set up in Canada who import from China and India)
Also, since I live near Mexico, I can take my paper scripts and go to MX. (Doctors around here for the most part aren't keen on Mexican pharmacies. )
Vinca
(50,285 posts)The doctor had no idea we had started buying insulin from Canada. I know there are scam pharmacies, but we researched the one we use and are happy with it.
LeftInTX
(25,422 posts)Vinca
(50,285 posts)to just say to hell with it and die.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)plus their deductibles and out of pockets can consume entire paychecks.
spinbaby
(15,090 posts)And I had no significant health problems. The cost of decent health insurance for a retired 64-year-old, co-pays, deductibles, and some dental work all added up to about $19,000.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)Don't be crass.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)is.
Ohiogal
(32,015 posts)People in other sane countries who have subsidized medical insurance probably wonder why we just can't "get it" like they do. It's shameful. Thanks, Republicans.
Soxfan58
(3,479 posts)Are all threatened by a healthcare system that is way behind the rest of the developed world.
But build that fucking wall asshole!
delisen
(6,044 posts)Your experience is horrible but valuable for those of us discussing health care costs.
Do you see the only solution as a single payer, government managed program which covers us all according to need and not tied to employment?
Right now that is what I see is needed. However I am open to other ideas.
LuckyCharms
(17,448 posts)1) An extremely robust public plan in which the financing would be managed by the government. This is the same as our current medicare. Medicare is currently managed/processed by government contractors who have an extremely low overhead rate.
2) These public plan contractors (read: medicare contractors) would be decentralized and staffed by current insurance company employees.
3) This public plan would be funded by income taxes or some other form of tax.
4) The system would cover every soul (United States citizen) whether they are employed or not. Also, whether they ever contributed directly to the system or not. We would all fill out the same initial paperwork.
5) While the government certainly would have a say in financing matters, practical medical matters would be as hands off by the government as possible. Doctors would be allowed to practice medicine, within established parameters negotiated between the medical community and the government (read: best practices would be established). Once established, doctors would be freed from fighting with insurance companies.
6) Employers would no longer bear the burden of sharing premium costs with their employees, thus increasing their bottom line earnings, thus increasing their earnings per share, thus increasing shareholder value, thus improving the stock market, as well as giving employers true incentives to expand their business and increase their head count.
7) An option would be made available to those who want Cadillac Care (ie: private rooms as an inpatient, etc.). The cost for this would be paid directly out of the patient's own pocket.