General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDOJ trying to protect Trump by arguing in court that he doesn't know what he's talking about.
Link to tweet
Also DOJ: When President Trump quotes somebody on Twitter accusing his government of wrongdoing, that "cannot be assumed to be his confirmation of the media reporting based on government information, and it is not evidence of government misconduct."
DOJ also says that when President Trump comments on national security matters on Twitter, that doesn't mean his statements are accurate, or that he has any personal knowledge that they are correct.
DOJ's argument that the president shouldn't be presumed to know what he's talking about is a pretty remarkable one, and it's not one I'd seen the government make before 2017. Now there's a fair amount of caselaw on it.
PJMcK
(22,037 posts)... Trump's administration has said that Trump is full of shit.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)Even more impressed at how many investigators, analysts, bloggers, etc., etc., there are on trump's case. Awesome, how every stone seems to gets turned. So many impressive people. [So different than Watergate. There is hope].
Btw, Rachel on Thursday night had a Buzzfeed guy on, Anthony Cormier - very. very sharp and impressive.
Jarqui
(10,126 posts)Lifting Russian sanctions key to Trump deal exposed by Cohen
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/lifting-russian-sanctions-key-to-trump-deal-exposed-by-cohen-1385505347911
If one did not have a lot of time to get caught up on all the things going on with this scandal and were interested, that 25 minutes is probably time well spent. I have been following it and thought it was outstanding.
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)babylonsister
(171,072 posts)whether he knows what he's talking about or not. Too bad he has no capacity for shame.