Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
Mon Nov 26, 2018, 01:25 PM Nov 2018

The NRA just got fantastic news from a former Supreme Court justice

America's gun epidemic is going to get worse.

IAN MILLHISER
NOV 26, 2018, 10:42 AM

The Supreme Court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller was, at once, a doctrinal earthquake and a somewhat contained storm. Heller held, for the first time in American history, that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms. Yet Justice Antonin Scalia’s opinion for the Court contained so many caveats and exceptions that many gun regulations remain intact a decade later.

However, in an interview with the New York Times’ Adam Liptak, retired Justice John Paul Stevens suggests that many of those caveats are likely to be wiped away soon. According to Liptak, Stevens “helped persuade Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who was in the majority, to ask for ‘some important changes’ to Justice Scalia’s opinion.”

The result was a passage providing that Heller should not “be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

The upshot of Stevens’ highly unusual revelation — justices, even retired justices, rarely disclose internal Court deliberations — is that there are probably no longer five votes on the Supreme Court who support this language in Heller. A wide range of firearm restrictions intended to keep firearms out of the hands of especially dangerous individuals or to keep them out of “sensitive places such as schools” could soon fall.

https://thinkprogress.org/stevens-nra-kennedy-heller-supreme-court-eb23f34687b3/

Assholes can't even think outside the box that there ruling's make them have blood on there right wing fucking hands.................and at least two of these five right wing libertarian justices don't belong on the bench






7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
1. This might lead to a rewrite of the 2nd amendment.
Mon Nov 26, 2018, 01:41 PM
Nov 2018

If SCOTUS allows indescriminate access to guns and shooting deaths skyrocket, after a period of absolute hell, it might be enough to get support for a new amendment.

It sure won't be fun getting there.

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
2. I am so anti-gun, when I saw my grade school principle, and science/ math teacher
Mon Nov 26, 2018, 01:47 PM
Nov 2018

get gunned down, principle died, and that has been over 55 year's ago, and know one knows what it is like unless you see it and live with that trauma, and now these five right wing hypocrites in the future turn this country into a complete war zone....................and they just don't give a crap

aikoaiko

(34,170 posts)
7. I doubt we will ever have indiscriminate access to firearms.
Mon Nov 26, 2018, 02:00 PM
Nov 2018


But I do see certain things like bans or confiscations being declared unconstitutional.

maxsolomon

(33,345 posts)
3. It says what it says. the 2nd Amendment is a suicide pact.
Mon Nov 26, 2018, 01:50 PM
Nov 2018

It's amazing we don't have more homicides every year.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. Even with trump appointees, the SC is not likely to change Heller except toward more restrictions.
Mon Nov 26, 2018, 01:54 PM
Nov 2018

Stinky The Clown

(67,800 posts)
6. If there weren't so fucking many gun OWNERS, there would be very little pressure to make such ruling
Mon Nov 26, 2018, 01:54 PM
Nov 2018

I lay all of this at the feet of GUN OWNERS - every fucking one of them. In my view, gun OWNERSHIP is irresponsible except for the government's ability to arm and maintain a "militia". There is, in my view, no reason for private gun ownership. NONE.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The NRA just got fantasti...