General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsREID RESPONDS! “We'll believe it when we see it!”
This just can't get any better. It's like the energizer bunny of campaign issues!
http://www.buzzfeed.com/johnstanton/reid-dismisses-romney-payment-claim
Reid Dismisses Romney Tax Claim
We'll believe it when we see it, says spokesman in response to Romney's assertion Thursday that he's paid at least 13% of his income in taxes every year for the last decade.
"We'll believe it when we see it. Until Mitt Romney releases his tax returns, Americans will continue to wonder what he's hiding. Romney seems to think he plays by a different set of rules than every other presidential candidate for the last thirty years, all of whom lived up to the standard of transparency set by Mitt Romney's father and released their tax returns," Reid spokesman Adam Jentleson told Buzzfeed in a statement Thursday.
I stand with Harry Reid!
On Edit: I suspect they already know what's in Romney's returns.
gademocrat7
(10,675 posts)ananda
(28,879 posts)Keep this issue hot!
YES Keep this issue hot!!!!
PearliePoo2
(7,768 posts)Don't let up....please!
russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)most of the bad things I said about you.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)The Magistrate
(95,257 posts)We already know Romney lies about what is on his tax returns contain.
That he lied about this in running for governor of Massachusetts is a matter of public record.
There is no reason whatever to trust a word that comes out of this congenital liar's mouth!
If he wants to be believed, he has to produce the returns....
"Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus."
"Romney loves America like a tick loves a dog."
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)thinks it's hell! (With another hat tip to HST and to you
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)I am loving it. Go, Harry, go!
And I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that Harry knows more than enough about Mittwit's taxes to justify his comments.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)and agree that Reid has backup on this and will keep biting at Romney with bits of more info as time goes on.
it will drive the Rmoney's madder than they are now. Both Ann and Mittie look like feral little lying weasels when on camera. Their body language and facial expressions are like an open book of Deceit.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)wouldn't be hanging on this like a dog to a bone.
Reid is extremely soft-spoken and rarely rails on the GOP (or anyone else for that matter), so for him to go off, full-throated, on this issue, means, to me, that he knows SOMETHING.
Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)The republican party loves their demigod Reagan, so this seems an appropriate response to Rmoney's assertion we should take him at his word.
stlsaxman
(9,236 posts)registered in MA at his son's unfinished basement. His returns will show an out of state main residence that year.
Felony.
Done.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I think Harry Reid knows SOMETHING and I think this is it.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)It goes something like "How do we know Harry Reid is lying? The Obama campaign hasn't leaked the tax returns". Of course I don't believe that Reid is lying, but there's a kernel of truth in there. They obviously don't have all the information they need, otherwise it would have got out there somehow. The Obama campaign isn't afraid to play hardball.
Waltons_Mtn
(345 posts)(Let's assume that Harry has them, for the sake of this discussion.)
I see a couple of problems with leaking this information.
First, they are not supposed to have this information. I think there is some serious legal aspects about having copies of someone else's federal tax returns. So Harry could get into serious trouble if the leak could be traced back to anyone who has ever spoken to Harry Reid. (I think the repubs have enough money to spend to track any leak down. Hell they could get congress to track the leak down with an investigation into Harry Reid. Saying he did something illegal.)
Another problem is they would claim that anything leaked is not true. They would say that the forms have been altered to make it look like Mittens has done something wrong. We would say well then prove it and this would turn RMoney into the victim. He would get a lot of sympathy because they would say he is being attacked. Faux news would play that up big time. (Actually I am kind of surprised the Repubs have not done this already.)
Just my opinion of course.
PearliePoo2
(7,768 posts)Hey Mittens! Lying for the Lord lately??
Cha
(297,774 posts)LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)are traditionally associated with a specific state. Mitt is a nomad. Very odd.
BREMPRO
(2,331 posts)an issue so central to republicans efforts this year- voter fraud, that imaginary crisis created for pure political reasons to suppress voter participation, to have their own presidential candidate caught committed voter fraud!? that would be priceless....
don't think we'll ever see them now.. but hope this dogs his campaign all the way to Nov...
stlsaxman
(9,236 posts)Romney and his wife, Ann, sold the 6,500-square-foot Massachusetts colonial where they raised their five sons, fetching $3.5 million. They also unloaded a 9,500-square-foot family retreat at the Deer Valley ski resort in Utah for close to its $5.25 million asking price....
They still do not own a property in Massachusetts, forcing them to claim temporary residence at a basement apartment in the Belmont home owned by their eldest son, Tagg. It's the address Romney used to vote in Republican Scott Brown's recent victorious Senate special election race, all legal with town officials.
Spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom said the Romneys are buying their own home in Belmont, but a March closing was pushed back to June because of "contractor delays." That has put forced the Romneys to watch the number of days they spend in California, ensuring they do not raise questions about their primary residency for tax, voting or other legal purposes.
So... they KNEW about requirements for voting in MA and intentionally flaunted that law, right? if the Romney's Federal Tax Returns show their primary residence as OTHER than Massachusetts...?
AllyCat
(16,234 posts)Interesting
Brother Buzz
(36,478 posts)madashelltoo
(1,703 posts)Don't flinch. Don't let up on him. He's sweating like a pig and his mouth is always dry. You've got him on the ropes. Don't let him up. He's calling in the Mrs. for backup and she's twitching, her wrinkle cream is failing and she's lying so hard and fast EVERYBODY knows she's lying. Don't let him up.
StrictlyRockers
(3,855 posts)Keep 'em on the ropes, boxing champ!
Berlum
(7,044 posts)typical 1% republican
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)I wish I could get the breaks he get but something in there is very damaging.
Maven
(10,533 posts)13%?!
He's actually bragging that he's paid at least 13%?!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)He sounds exactly like J.P. Morgan who once famously said "I owe the public nothing!" Times may change but the attitude of plutocrats remains ever the same.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)k&r
GObamaGO
(665 posts)Why is it, I get the distinct feeling that Romney thought he would just be handed the presidency, just like he's been handed everything else in his selfish, narcissistic life?
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)If the tables were turned and if it was Pres O, the corporate media would be all over it 24/7. If it were the Dems who are suppressing the voters as well as purging voters, the corporate media would be over it 24/7.
Journalism is dead, except for pockets of it. I also stand with "Dirty Harry" and "G.I. Joe"!
louis-t
(23,297 posts)Harry, you rock.
aquart
(69,014 posts)wake.up.america
(3,334 posts)So why does not Reid come up with the goods? Waiting for RMoney to continue to make a fool of himself by denying any misdeeds? Reid will look foolish by asserting Mitt is hiding something grievous and Mitt proves otherwise.
By the way, why is his name pronounced reed and not ride?
Samantha
(9,314 posts)that Romney has avoided paying taxes, it is better to allude to that during the campaign, raising his (Romney's) political blood pressure stewing over what they will do, and toward the end of the campaign (right before the election) drop the evidence hammer. So I am hoping those who think Harry has the goods are correct, but either way, this is a great drill Reid has going on ....
Sam
sofa king
(10,857 posts)As I have pointed out every time this comes up, it doesn't take a Sherlock Holmes to figure out that if Mitt is willing to take this much damage over it already, whatever he is hiding is much worse than the ass-kicking he is already taking over it.
Mitt would not plead "please stop," or defy his opponent to "prove it" if he were innocent, because he already has the documentation that can prove it to everyone's satisfaction, and that's exactly what he ain't giving up. If this were a court of law, the jury would be instructed to consider Mitt's refusal to release potentially exonerating evidence as evidence against him, as Harry Reid well knows.
Senator Reid is a former prosecutor, and the logical certitude outlined above would have only assisted him in finding the proper place to look and the proper people to ask to confirm his more-than-suspicion.
I also feel confident that the evidence he required to start this bloodbath is firmly in hand, and he is now merely toying with Mitt as if he were a cat playing with a wounded mouse, keeping it in the papers every week until he's good and ready to strike the final blow.
Senator Reid is also forcing Mitt to step down a weight class to tangle with him, the undercard, rather than the Champion. Romney is losing time and stature by being drawn into this fight--a fight he cannot escape and which he cannot win, because he is guilty as Hell.
wiggs
(7,819 posts)blends 'sofa king bueno'.
FYI
savannah43
(575 posts)Duh! Try thinking about it.
bayareaboy
(793 posts)Let me say again, it is like playing poker. You don't play out of sequence.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)And looking weak is the #1 death knell to a presidential candidacy.
I originally wrote "probably" because likability is pretty important as well. But nobody liked Nixon. He won on the weak perception of his Democratic opponents alone.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)I always thought he was a pansy till the past few weeks.
Good for him.
rocktivity
(44,580 posts)rocktivity
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Wednesdays
(17,439 posts)And then crow about how "forthcoming" he's been. Won't matter how sloppy or suspicious they look, anyone questioning him will be blasted as a looney conspiracy theorist. Mark my words.
He's having the returns forged as we sit here pondering the situation.
theinquisitivechad
(322 posts)How do you 'forge' returns? Won't the records be corroborated or not by the IRS, who has the historical data? Or do they not keep those records? Not asking to be argumentative, I just simply don't understand. . .
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)savannah43
(575 posts)No way he can be trusted to be honest now. Too little, too late. The GOP ought to drop this hot potato and run Ryan. Never mind. That wouldn't help them, either. It's also too late for them to stop digging, isn't it?
LibGranny
(711 posts)Thrill
(19,178 posts)it.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)rtracey
(2,062 posts)John McCain's camp vetted Romney for vice president and saw many years of his tax returns 4 years ago, and STILL picked Sarah Palin.... What does that tell you....... Something is in there that no repub wants the US citizens to see.
spanone
(135,892 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)He sounds like a charlatan to me.
A dumb one, at that.
There's no way this issue is going to go away now.
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)that Harry is sleeping much better than Mitt & Ann or ANYONE attached to their campaign.
How much doctoring of his returns could be done to pass scrutiny? And the residency issue is mighty problematic, too.
Wish Lawrence O. or Ed would get Harry on their show this week.
K&R
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Raine
(30,541 posts)Vietnameravet
(1,085 posts)Keep it up Harry..people want a strong leader not someone kowtowing to these thugs from the right.. They sure cant take what they give out..
BrainMann1
(460 posts)Get Him Reid!
BumRushDaShow
(129,631 posts)Keep at it!!
madokie
(51,076 posts)I'm dancing with him
wildeyed
(11,243 posts)He is playing so dirty on this one. And I would kiss him on the mouth for it if I could.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)It is a simple question. It can be answered "yes" or "no" and would take 15 seconds to clear up.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)before Nov. 7.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)If the Obama team has the good on Romney, I can certainly understand THEM waiting until after the convention.
But I don't understand the media not every simply asking the question. They don't work for the Obama campaign. They can ask their own questions. This is such a simple question to ask, why hasn't it been asked?
Amonester
(11,541 posts)corporations.
At this point, maybe these 'journalists' either couldn't ask their way to Time Square or they have been 'ordered' not to ask 'hardball' questions (if they want to keep their high paying jobs) to Romneyhood by their 'higher ups' ... As it's surely not that much a difficult question to ask as a follow up, but their bosses want to keep their horse race intact as long as possible.
Can't find another rationale.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)there have been a few to ask "what's your tax rate?" Instead of asking that question over and over, it seems like one of them could simply say,
Governor Romney, your 2010 return indicated a Swiss bank account closed during 2010. Many commentators have noted that in 2009, the IRS offered an amnesty program for people who had Swiss bank accounts. I don't believe you have made any comments about that, and that leads some people to speculate about this. Can we put this question to rest right now? Can you state unequivocally that you or nobody acting on your behalf used the IRS amnesty program with regard to any foreign accounts you held or you benefited from? That's a simple "yes" or "no" and we'll move on to other questions of importance to this election.
How hard is that?
Amonester
(11,541 posts)1. Document (it requires working searches they don't want to do and they prefer coffee breaks and 'FaceBooking').
2. Formulate the questions (too complicated and thus, borrrring).
3. They're not 'working' at PBS.
Sums it up like it's 1, 2, 3.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)"Governor Romney, did you or anybody working on your behalf utilize the IRS amnesty program with regard to Swiss bank accounts you benefited from?"
That talks less than 10 seconds to ask.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)Although I'd be very surprised to hear about one of them asking it before the convention.
I would prefer it would 'pop up' in one of the three debates with President Obama, though.
I can imagine the intensity of the blush on his face and the nervous laugh as he'll try to weasel his way out of it.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)When he ran for Governor, there was a question whether he had maintained legal residence. The press and Democrats demanded to see the tax returns because a whistle blower had said he had abandoned his MA residence for tax reporting purposes (evidently he could save a few bucks on state taxes by declaring himself a UT resident.)
Romney flat-out lied and said that his returns showed he was a MA resident.
Eventually they got access to the returns, which showed Romney was flat-out lying. He then went back and amended his returns, and that apparently passed muster as far as the MA Constitution was concerned.
My point is that we have to assume he will lie about anything. That means we need to get the question asked and answered (which may be a lie) ASAP so that there will still be time to get the truth out before election day.
All of this assumes that there is a good chance he did use the amnesty. Most people in the MSM (and many here, it appears) figure "Nobody would ever take the chance of lying about something as cut-and-dried as that."
Yes. Mitt Romney would. He has. He would do it again.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Generic Brad
(14,276 posts)We are talking about income tax though. Romney never states that. He vaguely refers to "taxes" in general. Everyone pays sales tax.
And as for the 15% - I call total bullshit. I will believe it when I see it.
brightertomorrow
(122 posts)I'll believe it when I see it. If there's nothing to hide just release the taxes. Simple as that!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)rks306
(116 posts)Draft dodger paid taxes, did he pay any INCOME TAX.
dimbear
(6,271 posts)when you couldn't stand up to Harry Reid?"
Coming and going, I believe that's called.
BadSaratoga
(14 posts)from Palin's back porch all the way to the Kremlin...
bayareaboy
(793 posts)or your Mama or any other kind of betting game with a guy from Las Vegas. He will take you every time.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)Beacool
(30,253 posts)Romney's taxes are the most important issue? How about what both parties plan to do to rev up the economy?
I had enough of hearing about inane issues like birth certificates, college records, taxes and dogs on roof. I don't give a crap about any of this white noise.
No wonder USA Today reported that 90M people don't plan to vote this year.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-08-15/non-voters-obama-romney/57055184/1
theinquisitivechad
(322 posts). . .conservatives are trying to buy the White House and pave the way with negative ads. If we don't fight on the same level, they'll slice our legs right out from under us. Even being outspent on this campaign, we're still keeping up, and I personally believe it's because we're fighting dirty every step of the way. And if it helps us, I'm all for it.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Love that he's not backing down.