General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOf 13 members on anti-Pelosi list, 10 are to the right of Dem Caucus
Link to tweet
?s=21
Of 13 current members on anti-Pelosi list, 10 are to the right of the Democratic caucus median & 11 are to the right of Pelosi. Copying Freedom Caucus tactics, but not a revolt from the left. Capitulating to a centrist minority of caucus would have implications for the session.
And 14 of 17 are men.
yardwork
(61,711 posts)That's every day in America.
hlthe2b
(102,376 posts)They don't see themselves being manipulated by the RW, but they ARE.
yardwork
(61,711 posts)wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)think she is not progressive enough.
If they get their way they may be stuck with a centrist Speaker.
Also I dont think anyone here has come up with a name (who wants the job) to replace her or a valid reason to.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)by these same members are being sponsored by Joe Liebermans pro-business, conservative No Labels group. Any progressive whos on board needs to read through them carefully. I dont trust Lieberman as far as I can throw him. My worry is that theyre trying to take advantage of new members who may not be familiar with all the rules ,with things that sound good but really arent . I know this because a No Labels member was on Hardball last night.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)labels means compromise for compromises sake.
I think we found out that we dint need to compromise to win elections.
Bluepinky
(2,276 posts)Nancy is our response to Mitch McConnell. The Repubs want her gone because shes so effective.
Dont replace a proven winner.
OnDoutside
(19,972 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)Cha
(297,688 posts)does? Sanchez or Fudge?
LuvLoogie
(7,034 posts)I have never heard of either of them doing anything ambitious other tan talk about it.
Cha
(297,688 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,094 posts)Bunch of chicken shits.