Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAbramson on Corsi and Stone coming indictments:
Last edited Mon Nov 12, 2018, 10:17 PM - Edit history (3)
NOTE/ PROOF OF COLLUSION details in painstaking fashion every lie Stone has told about whether he had a backchannel to WikiLeaks and, if so, who it was; whether and how he stayed in touch with Trump after he was "fired" from the campaign; and other Russian contacts he lied about.
7 replies 55 retweets 232 likes
Show this thread
Seth Abramson
?Verified account @SethAbramson
40m40 minutes ago
(THREAD) The men below say Mueller is about to indict them. Both are suspected of a) collusive crimes, b) perjury. We have enough info to intelligently discuss their likely crimes; I do the necessary Trump-Russia deep dive here. It's wild stuff. I hope you'll read on and retweet.
3:54 PM - 12 Nov 2018
1/ Kremlin agent Joseph Mifsud told George Papadopoulos the Kremlin had stolen Clinton emails on April 25, 2016. According to testimony from Trump aide John Mashburn, Papadopoulos emailed this intelligence to Mashburn (and possibly others) sometime almost immediately thereafter.
2/ Within two weeks, a massive campaign to get Clinton's stolen emails from the Russians had kicked offand it involved many high-ranking officials in the Trump campaign. From the NatSec team, Flynn, Papadopoulos, and Schmitz; from the campaign brass, Bannon, Conway, and Clovis.
3/ It's now known that the operation was considered so sensitive that second-level cut-outstrusted individuals a layer removed from the campaignwere enlisted, including Peter W. Smith, Roger Stone, and, it's believed, Jerome Corsi. Stone stayed in touch with Trump *directly*.
4/ Of course, Don Jr. also attended a meeting with Manafort and Kushner believing he'd receive these materials directly from Kremlin agentsand Trump directly requested the release of such materials during a presser in July 2016. Trump's campaign was *obsessed* with "her emails."
5/ The Trump campaign was *so* obsessed with using its pro-Russia/anti-US sanctions policy to solicit stolen emails from Russia thatbesides the 14 conspirators I already mentionedeven shadow NatSec adviser Erik Prince was working the Clinton email angle *96 hours pre-election*.
6/ Some of the same people involved in trying to get stolen materials from the Russians were involved in secret meetings with Russians in which foreign policy was negotiated; others were involved in literally *giving the Russians value*, for instance in changing the RNC platform.
7/ It appears Mashburn may have been involved in overseeing the pro-Russia RNC platform change; certainly, the National Security Advisory Committeeestablished/overseen by Clovis; advised by Flynn, Prince and Bannon; employing Papadopoulos and Schmitzwas directly involved in it.
8/ The simple logic: Trump had agreed to a sanctions agenda involving the unilateral dropping of sanctions on Russia in return for Russian bribes, so he knew Putin supported him; he believed the Kremlin had intel on Clintonor could manufacture itthat would win him the election.
9/ As Trump's "Find her emails!" campaignwhich sought out Russian hackers on the Dark Web and otherwise, as well as indirectlysecretly raged on in June/July, a concurrent Felix Sater/Michael Cohen campaign to seal a Trump Tower Moscow deal (the "Trump-Rozov" deal) was ongoing.
10/ In early June 2016, Sater told Cohen the Trump-Rozov dealwhich had stalled in January 2016could be negotiated and completed in July 2016 if Cohen would travel to Moscow for an event Sater had gotten him an invite to. Putin's right-hand man Peskov*and Putin*would be there.
11/ With a face-to-face meeting between Trump attorney Cohen and Putin himself in the offingas that's what Sater was offering Trumpit's clear (a) Cohen told Trump of the offer and (b) Cohen had *every possible incentive* to travel to Moscow to meet directly with Vladimir Putin.
12/ But Cohen didn't go to Moscowwhich until recently was INEXPLICABLE, given that he'd been angling to get close to Putin and Peskov (in order to close the secret Trump-Rozov business deal) for many, many months. But now we have a likely explanationup to an almost certain one.
13/ The explanation comes in the form of Cohen's excuse for not going to Moscowhe told Sater he would be far too busy in the 10 days pre-RNCand what *actually* happened in those 10 days, which is that Cohen...
...went on "vacation." In "Italy." Or so he told everyone he could.
14/ Cohen told people he was on the island of Capri with a frienda member of Bruce Springsteen's E Street Band. The problem...
...is that that friend's wife says *they were never in Capri with Cohen*, despite being in Italy at the time. In fact, they *never saw Cohen there*.
15/ Moreover, Cohenin traveling to Italyentered an EU travel zone that allowed him to get to other European capitals, *including Prague*, without an additional stamp in his passport. Remember that he waved his passport about to Hannity saying it'd prove he never went to Prague.
16/ Remember, too, that Cohen allegedly having never gone to Prague was *the only alleged error Trump's allies ever identified in the Steele dossier*. And remember who else was in Italy: Joseph Mifsud, who worked at a university there and had met secretly with Papadopoulos there.
6 replies 66 retweets 262 likes
17/ Mifsud, of course, was the Trump campaign's *contact* on the question of the Kremlin having stolen Clinton emails. So even if Cohen never left Italy (July 9 to 17) he *did* lie about where he was and had ready access to *the* Kremlin intermediary on the subject of the emails.
18/ We've every reason to think other members of Trump's NatSec team believed they had to go to Europe to get access to Russian agents: Page met a Russian agent in Hungary; Prince went to Hungary and refused to tell Congress about it; Schmitz went to Hungary without explanation.
?
19/ And now we find that the very man who appears to have had advance knowledge of WikiLeaks' release of stolen Clinton documents, Jerome Corsi, not only shared that knowledge with Trump pal Roger Stonewho was in touch with Trumpbut also may have been in Italy while Cohen was.
20/ Corsi said today that Mueller asked him *many* questions about an "anniversary" trip he took to Italy in 2016, which may well have coincided with Cohen's "vacation" there and Joseph Mifsud's continued "employment" at a university there. Italy is clearly a key collusion spot.
PS/ My book PROOF OF COLLUSION will be released tomorrow, and this level of detail on the Trump campaign's collusionin fact much greater detail than this, and sourcedcan be found on every one of the book's 450 pages. You can find the book on Amazon here:
NOTE/ PROOF OF COLLUSION details in painstaking fashion every lie Stone has told about whether he had a backchannel to WikiLeaks and, if so, who it was; whether and how he stayed in touch with Trump after he was "fired" from the campaign; and other Russian contacts he lied about.
End of conversation
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1582 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Abramson on Corsi and Stone coming indictments: (Original Post)
triron
Nov 2018
OP
BumRushDaShow
(129,088 posts)1. Link to the unrolled thread
wiggs
(7,814 posts)2. I read Abramson every day. His legal and logical analysis is razor sharp. I hope his optimism
that legal processes, justice, and outing of secret information will win the day is not misplaced.
So much of his writing makes sense and the puzzle pieces fit together. Biggest legal/political scandal in history. Deep and broad conspiracy. Historic infamy and treachery and stupidity. So, so much that should enter the legal system and public discourse for digestion and processing. But will it?
empedocles
(15,751 posts)3. Great stuff. 2019 will be an exciting year
Thank you.