Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEven John "Torture Memo" Yoo comes out against Whitaker appointment
Link to tweet
John Yoo (yes that John Yoo) weighs in on the Whitaker appointment
"The Constitution says that principal officers must go through appointment with the advice and consent of the Senate. In Morrison v. Olson, the Supreme Court made clear that the Attorney General is a principal officer. Therefore, Whittaker cannot serve as acting Attorney General despite the Vacancies Act (which does provide for him to be acting AG) the statute is unconstitutional when applied in this way."
John Yoo in an email
https://www.axios.com/trump-acting-attorney-general-whitaker-legal-challenges-a9199197-9817-42b4-8df2-95f92cabc861.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=twsocialshare&utm_campaign=organic
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 851 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Even John "Torture Memo" Yoo comes out against Whitaker appointment (Original Post)
NewJeffCT
Nov 2018
OP
tinrobot
(10,900 posts)1. John Yoo (or somebody) needs to file a lawsuit
If this is an unconstitutional appointment, it needs to be challenged.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)3. I know it wouldn't hold up
but, doesn't every American technically have standing if Trump sold out our country?
tinrobot
(10,900 posts)5. Rosenstein has standing.
He's been denied a job.
Just noticed this:
#BREAKING: CNN and CBS news crews outside the federal courthouse in DC where Rosenteins attorney just made an appearance.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211395976
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)6. According to Laurence Tribe - one of the leading experts on Constitutional law the past 40 years
Hekate
(90,686 posts)2. Wow. I am impressed. nt
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)4. RW extremist Erick Erickson also says it's unconstitutional