Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 04:22 PM Nov 2018

Speaking of magazine capacity

I, and the majority of gun owners (of which I’m not) would not complain if the “standard magazine” for existing guns would hold whatever the stock mag held when the gun was designed. For newly designed guns there could be a limit.

What we need to get rid of is the mags so long you can use them as a monopod.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Speaking of magazine capacity (Original Post) jmowreader Nov 2018 OP
The arguement against banning of detachable hi-capacity mags goes like this: Kaleva Nov 2018 #1

Kaleva

(36,301 posts)
1. The arguement against banning of detachable hi-capacity mags goes like this:
Thu Nov 8, 2018, 04:33 PM
Nov 2018

It won't do much good to ban detachable "standard" capacity magazines because mass shooters can quickly change out magazines.

Plus

Banning detachable "standard" capacity magazines would place an undo burden on target shooters at a firing range as they'd have to spend more time changing out magazines.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Speaking of magazine capa...