Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yep, This Describes Fox and its viewers exactly (Original Post) n2doc Aug 2012 OP
I've been wondering about this complaint lately Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #1
Except Fox is on an astounding number of tv's in waiting rooms n2doc Aug 2012 #2
Not here in Austin. ananda Aug 2012 #3
I seriously doubt that explains their ratings Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #4
What explains their ratings is it's on in a lot of nursing homes. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2012 #5
ooo-kay n/t Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #6
If you could explain why it is on in the waiting rooms we would also A Simple Game Aug 2012 #24
I personally think it is because the righties can't stand listening to any other viewpoint n2doc Aug 2012 #26
That's probably it. A Simple Game Aug 2012 #42
It's the bimbo's that draw them in and the subtle racism that makes them stay. MatthewStLouis Aug 2012 #8
That being said Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #14
Fox validates the world view of its audience shawn703 Aug 2012 #9
It is very simple because Fox feeds them what they want to hear. ThomThom Aug 2012 #12
I don't think Fox "sways" many people. They just tell their viewers what they want to hear. Marr Aug 2012 #16
So what would be a good way to Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #18
You can appeal to their prejudices in the same way Fox does, I suppose. Marr Aug 2012 #27
When Fox first came out some time in the mid 90's, it was... Ned_Devine Aug 2012 #19
Has their viewership remained static or do they add new viewers? Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #22
Hate and anger and bitterness sells Smilo Aug 2012 #25
Ahhh yes! 99Forever Aug 2012 #28
Name-calling has an even worse track record. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #30
Uh huh... 99Forever Aug 2012 #32
Yesterday... awoke_in_2003 Aug 2012 #37
are you serious? Doctor_J Aug 2012 #33
People choose whether to listen to FM music or AM talk; so my questions remain. Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #34
As Jon Stewart said last night. Ganja Ninja Aug 2012 #7
I'll tell you why Fox leads the cable news pack: Flatulo Aug 2012 #10
Sorry, but I've never seen a hot babe on FOX - just overly made-up bimbos. HopeHoops Aug 2012 #13
Yep. Short skirts and dangling high heels unc70 Aug 2012 #35
I have to agree... CJCRANE Aug 2012 #36
Yeah, farts out of a TV. HopeHoops Aug 2012 #11
Faux Noise getting the latest story ----> lpbk2713 Aug 2012 #15
My apologies to actual elephants. mwooldri Aug 2012 #17
n2doc Diclotican Aug 2012 #20
ROFL gollygee Aug 2012 #21
Validation DissidentVoice Aug 2012 #23
Great Post! Thank You HangOnKids Aug 2012 #38
You're quite welcome n/t DissidentVoice Aug 2012 #39
As I walked into my mother in law's house today to drop off my daughter... Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2012 #29
I love it!!! Initech Aug 2012 #31
Ah, Fitzsimmons, our local cartoonist panader0 Aug 2012 #40
Perfect malaise Aug 2012 #41

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
1. I've been wondering about this complaint lately
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 09:17 AM
Aug 2012

Note the man has the remote control well in hand and from the looks of it has turned the "TV" on/changed the channel to Fox News. Say what you will about Fox (neither my husband or I watch TV news) the man has nonetheless chosen to watch Fox.

But he could just as easily gone to CBS, ABC, NBC, CSPAN, CNN, CNBC or even MSNBC. Heck, he could go to BBC or al Jazeera English if he wanted. But he obviously chose Fox. Why?

Fox can only sit there embedded where it is on the spectrum of channels. It has zero ability to make you punch in the numbers to turn to it. So why do people actively seek out Fox news of their own volition?

"Because he's an easily swayed moron!" is the usual answer.

Well, as I noted already, Fox can't sway anybody. Viewers have to first seek-out Fox. I don't seek-out Fox for the same reason I don't frequent threads on DU where the OP announces FB Friend/co-worker/relative sent them RW talking point such-and-such and then they proceed to post the entire thing verbatim, unedited and without commentary. In short, if I wanted to see that sort of thing I would seek it out on my own but I don't because it doesn't share my values.

But what if they are easily swayed morons? It seems to me the term "easily swayed" means the viewer will accept whatever is put in front of them. So why aren't the Maddows, Malloys and Schultzs of the world swaying them? They're on the same spectrum of satellite and radio recievers. It's just as easy to punch in 760 as it is 850 on your radio AM dial.

But if the audience is really a bunch of easily swayed morons do you want to say -- presumably with pride -- "Yeah, we've totally cornered the easily swayed moron market! Those morons are OUR morons! WoooOOOOooo!!!"

I strongly doubt that.

However, I would like to point-out, in all fairness I believe: Whether or not they really are easily swayed morons they will never become our audience, interlocutors or political compatriots so long as we insist on calling them easily swayed morons or any other demeaning term. "So run down to your local grocery store today and ask for Brand X: the choice of knuckle-dragging, mind-numbed neanderthals the world over!" will never be a successful marketing campaign.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
4. I seriously doubt that explains their ratings
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 09:51 AM
Aug 2012

I'm not a TV guru but I cannot imagine the rating services figure how many doctors waiting rooms a given program appears in or that potential audiences taking their cues from what they see at their doctor's office.

I've certainly been in plenty of doctor's offices over the years and never once have I felt the unction to subscribe to Field & Stream.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
5. What explains their ratings is it's on in a lot of nursing homes.
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:15 AM
Aug 2012

Bitter 70+ year old men sitting around and complaining about the government in the common area while Social Security and Medicare pay for their housing and treatment. Meanwhile, the 70+ year old women avoid that room or risk having those pigs act like they're offering themselves up for a sacrifice.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
24. If you could explain why it is on in the waiting rooms we would also
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 11:37 AM
Aug 2012

probably know why it is on in the homes.

It's a good question and if we knew the answer it would help us win hearts and souls to our side.

Maybe it's just the T and A?

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
26. I personally think it is because the righties can't stand listening to any other viewpoint
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 11:41 AM
Aug 2012

Since most people don't give a shit, the righties throw a fit, get their way and turn on any tv to Fox and any radio to Rush/hate inc. And there always seems to be a wingnut in any biz. I've seen it in oil changing places, doctors offices, airports, repair shops...of course, I live in the south so maybe it is different elsewhere.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
42. That's probably it.
Thu Aug 16, 2012, 09:25 PM
Aug 2012

I live in Northern New York where it's fairly moderate to liberal and most radios you hear in businesses are tuned to golden oldies. Most TV's are on headline news or where there may be a lot of kids, Nick. Often the remote is in the waiting room so you can pick what you want.

MatthewStLouis

(904 posts)
8. It's the bimbo's that draw them in and the subtle racism that makes them stay.
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:30 AM
Aug 2012

Sorry, but this is what Fox News is about.

I can't stand to watch it, mostly because I can predict their knee jerk/propaganda talking point reactions to everything.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
14. That being said
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:39 AM
Aug 2012

do you want Fox viewers to switch to more progressive influences or stay embedded at Fox?

Is the game plan to simple write-off everyone who doesn't immediately and reflexively agree with progressives the first time?

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
9. Fox validates the world view of its audience
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:31 AM
Aug 2012

It's no different than people who attend Westboro Baptist Church. They could have chosen to attend any other church in Topeka, but they chose Westboro because the anti-gay message is one they want to hear.

Close-minded people would rather hear people tell them that their beliefs are "correct" rather than be challenged on them.

ThomThom

(1,486 posts)
12. It is very simple because Fox feeds them what they want to hear.
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:36 AM
Aug 2012

They checked the others out, didn't believe them and went back to their comfort zone. They want to be reinforced that blacks and foreigners are out to get them, abortion is a sin, war is the only way to save people and on and on and on. Same reason we come here, too feed our positions, fortunately we have the "truth". Don't we? At least mostly truthiness.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
16. I don't think Fox "sways" many people. They just tell their viewers what they want to hear.
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:46 AM
Aug 2012

We all have biases and prejudices. The content on Fox and right-wing talk radio is about playing to those predetermined ideas and reinforcing them. It's comforting to have your world view validated. It's discomfiting to process ideas and facts that challenge that world view.

Fox never challenges it's viewers that way. If the facts don't fit with their narrative, they ignore the facts. Or rewrite them.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
27. You can appeal to their prejudices in the same way Fox does, I suppose.
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 12:19 PM
Aug 2012

But I doubt you could ever convert them to your way of thinking.

The only success I've had arguing with Republicans has been when I've cast the right wing position as the effeminate, less-manly one. If you can focus on Romney's soft hands and silk ties and dancing horse, for instance, they'll be more willing to sneer at him. But you'll never do it with logic.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
19. When Fox first came out some time in the mid 90's, it was...
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 11:25 AM
Aug 2012

...given free with everyone's cable package unlike MSNBC and several other cable news channels which come at an extra cost. Therefore, it became the readily available news source for countless households across the country. Yes, they used attractive women and coded language to lure in their audience and capitalize on their fears and anger. But the truth is, they won by default in that they were the only game in town that didn't cost the cable subscribers any extra money. How many millions of households did it reach and convert? Like I said, probably countless.

Brian

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
28. Ahhh yes!
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 12:32 PM
Aug 2012

The good old "if you are extra nice to assholes, they will change into humanitarians" meme.

Haven't heard that one before.

(And it works so well!!!!!!)


Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
30. Name-calling has an even worse track record.
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 01:13 PM
Aug 2012

When was the last time you agreed with someone who called you an "a-hole"?

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
33. are you serious?
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 01:43 PM
Aug 2012

1. Radio is 99.9% far right republican, 24/7. There is literally nothing else on.
2. The radio propagandists tell them, "tune to Fox - everything else is left wing"

Done.

Ganja Ninja

(15,953 posts)
7. As Jon Stewart said last night.
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:20 AM
Aug 2012

Fox News is there because it's easier than actually trying to insert your head into your own ass to escape reality.

 

Flatulo

(5,005 posts)
10. I'll tell you why Fox leads the cable news pack:
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:34 AM
Aug 2012

Hot babes.

It's really that simple. They're marketing sex, not news.

unc70

(6,120 posts)
35. Yep. Short skirts and dangling high heels
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 02:24 PM
Aug 2012

I was reminded again this week watching outtakes on TDS, et al. Always lots of short skirts on Fox, clearly in view and not protected by modesty panel or such in the desks or sets they use.

Heels have gotten much higher recently, particularly at Fox. Mostly 3-5" now.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
36. I have to agree...
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 02:44 PM
Aug 2012

Some of the women are stunning IMO. I am occasionally drawn to Fox News while clicking through the channels...

It's Murdoch's classic formula that he uses everywhere: titillation + propaganda.

Diclotican

(5,095 posts)
20. n2doc
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 11:30 AM
Aug 2012

n2doc

I had fox news - for a while, right after 11 sept 2001, on a channel - where it aired after "hours" (yes, the channel closed down after 1 am every night, and then fox news got on for some hours before the channel was on air again for the day) And it was interesting - fascination in a way - like you drive true a crash site, and you kind of look around, and try to get what is happening around you, with all the police, the ambulances, and the fire brigaders... But compared to a crash site, where you at least see the professionals, and you do know that some is hurt, maybe dead or near death.. The poisoned you get from fox news is just that, poisent, that everyone with a brain should get away from... Becouse you know, if you have fox on for long - it tend to get into your brain - and do damage....

Thankfully Fox news dosen't air in Norway - not on cable, not on satelite..

Diclotican

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
21. ROFL
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 11:31 AM
Aug 2012

That made me literally laugh out loud.

Hmm but it did not make me literally roll on the floor laughing.

DissidentVoice

(813 posts)
23. Validation
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 11:36 AM
Aug 2012

I think human beings, by nature, want validation of their beliefs.

Rupert Murdoch may have the ethics of a sewer rat but he's not stupid. He knows that playing on Americans' sense of (over-inflated) "patriotism" will make him money. It has.

Initially, I think the FN crowd came from Limbaugh. I remember he was touting FNC on his radio show just as it was about to be launched. His listeners largely take every word he says as objective truth; hence, the initial cadre of FNC's audience rode on Limbaugh's coattails.

FNC is good with flashy graphics and lots of Stars-and-Stripes symbolism. Americans who (falsely) think that the more you wave the Flag, the better "patriot" you are, buy into this.

As to "converting" them? If someone is so locked-into the FNC/Limbaugh/Beck/O'Reilly/Hannity world of "news" (anything not approved by the RNC and validated by the far-right media is "socialism&quot then there's no more hope of "converting" them than right-wingers have of "converting" faithful viewers of Maddow, Matthews, etc.

Personally I tend not to watch very much of the U.S. news media. I get most of my news from the BBC, CBC, Australian Broadcasting Corporation and Deutsche Welle (I speak German)...far more objective views of U.S. news since they don't usually have a dog in the fight.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,198 posts)
29. As I walked into my mother in law's house today to drop off my daughter...
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 12:57 PM
Aug 2012

....there was Fox News on the TV, front and center.

And it shows. She repeats all the talking points nearly verbatim.

It's sad how much Fox News abuses a fertile brain.

panader0

(25,816 posts)
40. Ah, Fitzsimmons, our local cartoonist
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 07:14 PM
Aug 2012

He's in the Az Daily Star out of Tucson. Finally made it to DU.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yep, This Describes Fox a...