Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 10:11 PM Aug 2012

I have a feeling FOX news isn't charging the Romney campaign for commercials.

Don't know if this violates any election laws but I bet the Romney camp is getting great deals on airtime over at FOX news. I wouldn't put it past Murdoch and Ailes to wave the fees for a fellow creep. Although I'm not sure if they make more money as a defend Mitt channel, or a hate Obama channel.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I have a feeling FOX news isn't charging the Romney campaign for commercials. (Original Post) JaneyVee Aug 2012 OP
Fox is pretty much a 24/7 commercial for Republicans anyway nt. Incitatus Aug 2012 #1
+1 doc03 Aug 2012 #8
Does it matter? Preaching to the choir. onehandle Aug 2012 #2
True. Which makes me think, if he IS paying what a terrible investor he is. JaneyVee Aug 2012 #4
By Law Blue Idaho Aug 2012 #3
What if they just say there are no more available slots, all their commercial time is already sold? Incitatus Aug 2012 #5
I work for a media outlet too, although it's one that doesn't air commercials. JaneyVee Aug 2012 #7
Doesn't Bain own part of FOX thelordofhell Aug 2012 #6
That's always been the case. The RW media doesn't even sell much space to the Dems. nanabugg Aug 2012 #9
Making money is a secondary consideration at Fox WhoIsNumberNone Aug 2012 #10
It's called an "in kind" contribution. longship Aug 2012 #11
 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
4. True. Which makes me think, if he IS paying what a terrible investor he is.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 10:16 PM
Aug 2012

Calm down, Mitt. You already have the ignorant, racist vote in the bag.

Blue Idaho

(5,057 posts)
3. By Law
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 10:15 PM
Aug 2012

Political ads must be sold at the media outlet's lowest rate. The outlet may not offer different rates depending on party affiliation.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
7. I work for a media outlet too, although it's one that doesn't air commercials.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 10:18 PM
Aug 2012

Thanks for the info. Maybe we should be demanding to see receipts. Release the receipts!

 

nanabugg

(2,198 posts)
9. That's always been the case. The RW media doesn't even sell much space to the Dems.
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 11:11 PM
Aug 2012

FOX is a 24-hr ad for the GOP like MSNBC is for the Dems. The difference is that FOX is mostly spin and MSNBC is mostly fact.

WhoIsNumberNone

(7,875 posts)
10. Making money is a secondary consideration at Fox
Tue Aug 14, 2012, 11:17 PM
Aug 2012

Right wing media is funded by billionaires, and its primary purpose is to keep working-class people ignorant and voting Red.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/aug/08/news-corporation-loss-legal-fees

longship

(40,416 posts)
11. It's called an "in kind" contribution.
Wed Aug 15, 2012, 01:25 AM
Aug 2012

According to FEC regulations as I last knew them in the 90's as party treasurer, it is reportable as a donation and must be within FEC requirements as any other contribution.

Under Citizen's United, I have no knowledge as I haven't done campaign finance for some number of years. The regulations change and I have not kept up. Maybe somebody can fill in details for current regulations.

If they haven't changed, such a thing which you suggest would likely exceed maximum donation levels and would be illegal, even as an in-kind donation.

I hope I've helped. Anybody else know better?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I have a feeling FOX news...