General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court Enables Mass Disenfranchisement of North Dakota's Native Americans
By Ashoka Mukpo, Staff Reporter, ACLU
October 12, 2018 | 5:00 PM
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court chose to stand by and allow the war against voting to continue. Just a little less than a month before midterm elections that will determine control of Congress, the court decided not to block North Dakotas restrictive voter ID law, which will make it harder for people in that state to cast their ballots.
Republicans in the state legislature insist that the law is needed to prevent voter fraud despite there being virtually no evidence that such fraud is a problem. Instead, the real effect of their law will be to prevent voters whom they fear from going to the polls and having their say in who represents them.
The voter ID law was introduced just months after Senator Heidi Heitkamp, a Democrat, eked out a narrow upset victory in 2012, winning by less than 3,000 votes. Republican lawmakers responded by passing restrictive voter ID legislation that all but guaranteed that large numbers of Native Americans who tend to vote Democratic wouldnt be able to participate in the political process. Specifically, the law requires voters to bring to the polls an ID that displays a current residential street address or other supplemental documentation that provides proof of such an address.
This may seem like an innocuous requirement, but in practice, its likely to disenfranchise thousands of Native Americans, many of whom live on reservations in rural areas and dont have street addresses. Since the U.S. Postal Service doesnt provide residential mail delivery in remote areas, many members of North Dakotas Native American tribes list their mailing addresses, like P.O. boxes, on their IDs. And some also dont have supplemental documentation, like a utility bill or bank statement, because of homelessness or poverty. Now, because the Supreme Court refused to block the law, people who show up at their polling station with a P.O. box on their ID will be turned away.
https://www.aclu.org/blog/voting-rights/supreme-court-enables-mass-disenfranchisement-north-dakotas-native-americans
Docreed2003
(16,862 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,721 posts)Tribal officials will stand outside polling stations on Nov. 6 with laptops and access to rural addressing software and a shared database of voter names. North Dakota is the only state that does not require voter registration, meaning eligible voters can generally show up at the polls and cast a ballot so long as they have proper identification.
O.J. Semans, chief executive of Four Directions, a national Native American voting rights group, said the strategy was legally watertight and necessary to counter the devastating court ruling.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-senate-battleground-native-american-voting-rights-activists-fight-back-against-voter-id-restrictions/2018/10/12/7bc33ad2-cd60-11e8-a360-85875bac0b1f_story.html?utm_term=.c17f99c50cd4
BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)Ohiogal
(32,004 posts)And I hope those despicable Rethuglican legislators choke on it.
Blueman13
(34 posts)However, it is just absolutely ridiculous that something like that needs to be done. Of course it was just a "coincidence" that this law enacted after Heitkamp won.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)create address's. Every path or trail in and on Reservations in on Plat Maps . Usually every house has a Fire Number assigned for Local Emergency Responders. So that should be the simplest answer.