Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
Fri Oct 12, 2018, 07:53 PM Oct 2018

Supreme Court Enables Mass Disenfranchisement of North Dakota's Native Americans

By Ashoka Mukpo, Staff Reporter, ACLU
October 12, 2018 | 5:00 PM

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court chose to stand by and allow the war against voting to continue. Just a little less than a month before midterm elections that will determine control of Congress, the court decided not to block North Dakota’s restrictive voter ID law, which will make it harder for people in that state to cast their ballots.

Republicans in the state legislature insist that the law is needed to prevent voter fraud — despite there being virtually no evidence that such fraud is a problem. Instead, the real effect of their law will be to prevent voters whom they fear from going to the polls and having their say in who represents them.

The voter ID law was introduced just months after Senator Heidi Heitkamp, a Democrat, eked out a narrow upset victory in 2012, winning by less than 3,000 votes. Republican lawmakers responded by passing restrictive voter ID legislation that all but guaranteed that large numbers of Native Americans — who tend to vote Democratic — wouldn’t be able to participate in the political process. Specifically, the law requires voters to bring to the polls an ID that displays a “current residential street address” or other supplemental documentation that provides proof of such an address.

This may seem like an innocuous requirement, but in practice, it’s likely to disenfranchise thousands of Native Americans, many of whom live on reservations in rural areas and don’t have street addresses. Since the U.S. Postal Service doesn’t provide residential mail delivery in remote areas, many members of North Dakota’s Native American tribes list their mailing addresses, like P.O. boxes, on their IDs. And some also don’t have supplemental documentation, like a utility bill or bank statement, because of homelessness or poverty. Now, because the Supreme Court refused to block the law, people who show up at their polling station with a P.O. box on their ID will be turned away.


https://www.aclu.org/blog/voting-rights/supreme-court-enables-mass-disenfranchisement-north-dakotas-native-americans

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Enables Mass Disenfranchisement of North Dakota's Native Americans (Original Post) BeckyDem Oct 2018 OP
This is disgusting...truly disgusting Docreed2003 Oct 2018 #1
Looks like tribal officials might have figured out a way around it: The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2018 #2
Thank goodness. BeckyDem Oct 2018 #3
Good for them! Ohiogal Oct 2018 #4
Good news to hear Blueman13 Oct 2018 #5
Glas to hear someone is taking steps to Wellstone ruled Oct 2018 #6
They wanted Kav confirmed in time for voter suppression. Amaryllis Oct 2018 #7

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,721 posts)
2. Looks like tribal officials might have figured out a way around it:
Fri Oct 12, 2018, 07:56 PM
Oct 2018
Native American activists have responded with plans to create addresses on the spot for those who need them on Election Day.

Tribal officials will stand outside polling stations on Nov. 6 with laptops and access to rural addressing software and a shared database of voter names. North Dakota is the only state that does not require voter registration, meaning eligible voters can generally show up at the polls and cast a ballot so long as they have proper identification.

O.J. Semans, chief executive of Four Directions, a national Native American voting rights group, said the strategy was “legally watertight” and necessary to counter the “devastating” court ruling.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-senate-battleground-native-american-voting-rights-activists-fight-back-against-voter-id-restrictions/2018/10/12/7bc33ad2-cd60-11e8-a360-85875bac0b1f_story.html?utm_term=.c17f99c50cd4
 

Blueman13

(34 posts)
5. Good news to hear
Fri Oct 12, 2018, 08:38 PM
Oct 2018

However, it is just absolutely ridiculous that something like that needs to be done. Of course it was just a "coincidence" that this law enacted after Heitkamp won.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
6. Glas to hear someone is taking steps to
Fri Oct 12, 2018, 09:00 PM
Oct 2018

create address's. Every path or trail in and on Reservations in on Plat Maps . Usually every house has a Fire Number assigned for Local Emergency Responders. So that should be the simplest answer.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Enables Mas...