General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsgratuitous
(82,849 posts)"Well, it's their own money! What the wealthy do with it is nobody else's business." This pat answer, of course, is directly at odds with what Republicans said the overrich were going to do, but that was then, and this is now. And the money's safely tucked away for the wealthy and it's too late to do anything about it now.
Republicans can come up with voter registration schemes and drawing district maps with near-surgical precision to maximize their voter strength far beyond their numbers, but figuring out how to tax the wealthy? You might as well try to build a perpetual motion machine! It's unpossible!
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)iluvtennis
(19,861 posts)rwsanders
(2,605 posts)because they think that will keep them up above "those people" (whoever the 1% decides "those" is). The 1% want to be royalty, which is why I say bundle them and their money up, give them a tin crown, a title and a small plot in Europe somewhere and be done with them.
I'm not sure how to get rid of their sycophantic followers, but they worship the 1% and they want an a "royalty" here in the states.
Shipwack
(2,162 posts)... they too will be wealthy, then they can also enjoy all the perks of low income taxes, low estate taxes, etc.
Yep, it will happen, any day now...
badhair77
(4,218 posts)Thanks for posting.
Cha
(297,275 posts)of Abigail Disney to make such a fact filled, detailed vid about the vicious LIES of trump's "tax cuts".
Link to tweet
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)MelissaB
(16,420 posts)delisen
(6,044 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Thank you Abigail Disney!
SixString
(1,057 posts)Calculating
(2,955 posts)We seriously need a candidate like Bernie in 2020 who's actually interested in addressing wealth inequality.
DemocracyMouse
(2,275 posts)It's now becoming a centrist position of sorts. The only people economic inequality freaks out as an issue are the wealthiest Americans and less wealthy Americans who still think it's a taboo subject.
People used to be afraid of mentioning cancer too.... The pendulum is swinging back to a traditional progressive tax rate. It's so traditional you'd think "conservatives" would like it! Reagan even once endorsed increasing taxes on the rich! (To pay for unnecessary military increases). But the protectors of the 1% are all radical nutjobs now. They were easy to fool. But the majority has caught on. Addressing inequality is now sober and centrist and necessary. (Got that news broadcasters?).
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Finally, once again, Liberal ideas make it into the public mainstream community. Sure is hard to believe the media is librul! :coff, gak:
getagrip_already
(14,757 posts)To say you are the 1% and receiving a huge tax cut is really way too broad a statement.
You get into the 1% with somewhere in the neighborhood of $400k in income (it changes every year). Now that is a lot of money, but if you earn even $500k in wages, you didn't get a huge tax cut UNLESS you also had a lot of that income come from capital gains or dividends or real estate profits.
The benefits were very targeted. They didn't go to wage earners as much as those who don't actually work for a living.
I'm not defending the "poor" end of the 1% bucket, just pointing out that it is even worse. The lions share went to the 0.1%.
Caliman73
(11,738 posts)when dealing with Americans with short attention spans. The thing is that taxation has always been a way of social control as well as paying for necessary public projects. When the corporate and individual tax rates were higher, the owners were forced to make a choice between giving that money to the government, or at least pouring some of it back into the company, charitable causes, or other civic minded endeavors.
bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)If you have a Tweeter, please re-tweet that!
How do we get MSNBC to play that on a loop? Or better yet, CNN to play it once?
FakeNoose
(32,639 posts)One of my favorite memes:
Also here's another favorite of mine:
We need to beat down these one-percenters every time they open their fuckin' mouths.
I'm so sick of these assholes, not one of them pays their fair share of taxes.
But! the middle class wage-slaves never get the option, our taxes are withheld from every paycheck.
Martin Eden
(12,869 posts)Republicans cry CLASS WARFARE when anyone suggests increasing taxes on the rich, but the plain fact of the matter is the rich have been waging and winning class warfare for decades.
And millions of fools who are getting ripped off keep voting for these thieves.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)...office!
KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)demmiblue
(36,858 posts)They do have a YouTube channel, but it hasn't been posted there yet.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)demmiblue
(36,858 posts)alfredo
(60,074 posts)argyl
(3,064 posts)I'd gotten used to the Mercedes and BMW ads, but Maserati?
If it's profitable for them to spend money on a Super Bowl ad, that's a pretty good sign that the have/have not gap is about the size of the Grand Canyon.
Haven't even bothered to watch the last couple of Super Bowls. They do still advertise Chevys and Fords, don't they?