General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTeacher who recounted Trump aide eating glue as a child is suspended
By HOWARD BLUME
OCT 11, 2018 | 10:55 PM
A teacher who recounted how a senior aide to President Trump ate glue as a third-grader is in trouble with her employers.
The Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District has placed veteran teacher Nikki Fiske on home assignment while it decides what to do, if anything, about disclosures she made about a young Stephen Miller.
Miller, 33, has grown up to be a senior advisor to Trump. But his prospects did not appear so promising to Fiske when Miller was a student in her classroom at Franklin Elementary School.
Do you remember that character in Peanuts, the one called Pig Pen, with the dust cloud and crumbs flying all around him? That was Stephen Miller at 8, Fiske recounted in an article posted Wednesday by the Hollywood Reporter. I was always trying to get him to clean up his desk he always had stuff mashed up in there.
And there was a problem with glue.
more
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-teacher-suspended-stephen-miller-20181011-story.html
mountain grammy
(26,623 posts)will be dragged of and imprisoned for some re training.. just like mother Russia.
magicarpet
(14,154 posts)... then feed the dissidents to the tigers or the sharks ?
KayF
(1,345 posts)just now on Fox News. He gave a very compelling argument.
MyOwnPeace
(16,927 posts)but I'm waiting to hear the story about the social studies teacher explaining the Kanye West visit to the Oval Office. If you play the tape you're gonna' get fired!
peekaloo
(22,977 posts)Bet he ate his boogers, too.
dsc
(52,162 posts)yes Stephen Miller is an awful human being but teachers have no business publicly bad mouthing their charges years later. Two wrongs don't make a right.
ProfessorGAC
(65,058 posts)It's not like this wouldn't have been public knowledge among the classmates, and it's not libelous or slanderous. After all, what harm could be claimed?
Geez, Kav-assualt tried to rape someone and it didn't harm his prospects. This doesn't harm Miller in any fashion.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)she wasn't one of his classmates; she was his teacher, and therefore had a professional responsibility to keep her mouth shut.
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)Classmates are free to talk; teachers aren't - as to anything they learned as part of that relationship.
ProfessorGAC
(65,058 posts)That's ok. We don't do lockstep around these parts.
Why is it OK for me to say that student X was brilliant, but not that he/she displayed seriously anti-social tendencies.
I think that my duty to society supersedes hiding the truth about dangerous people.
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)As to glue-eating - it would not rise to the level of danger that would overcome the obligation to protect the privacy of students.
We recently had to deal with an implied threat of imminent harm, serious enough to prompt an immediate ban from campus. It was not clear we could legally identify the student for the purpose of ensuring everyone knew to report his presence immediately to campus police if he entered campus. Ultimately, we opted to identify him but will likely have ot defend that choice in a court of law.
Eating glue decades ago is nowhere near the danger level required to justify violating a student's privacy.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I could see where as a kid it might not be nice to talk about the kid by name. But there's no student/teacher privilege.
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)It's not a privilege - it's the law.
Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)isn't representative of how they'll behave as an adult. Plenty of good people did this kind of stuff as kids. So what? Also, now anyone that's ever been her student is going to worry about her blabbing about them in a public manner.
KayF
(1,345 posts)they can think, like I did, that the Hollywood Reporter is a rag for writing this story.
I don't see a point in suspending the teacher.
Zing Zing Zingbah
(6,496 posts)about her students. She represents the school district and that wasn't the kind of public image they wanted to project. They want people to know that they don't think it is ok for teachers to publicly run their mouths about your child (even if they are adults now). She should have gotten permission from her school district leadership first. I doubt they would have given her permission to do such a story anyhow, but that is what the teachers are supposed to do. I could only see it if the information was valuable for a court case or something like that and even then you are supposed to consult with the school district leadership first.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)As far as I know.
treestar
(82,383 posts)He is an adult and became a public figure - this is not harming him.
Ironically, she reveals more about her own character than she does his. Besides, the adult version of Miller is a strange and unsettling creature, providing more than enough material for ridicule.
phylny
(8,380 posts)to the public.
lame54
(35,292 posts)Don't think there is such a thing
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)But if he were a young black man who had just been murdered by a police officer, I wonder if his teachers would be suspended for revealing that "he was no angel, you know ...""
dsc
(52,162 posts)If a teacher, or anyone else for that matter has relevant information, they should go to authorities in the type of case you site. for example the student bragged about doing x or y in their presence. Otherwise they should shut their mouths.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)I don't recall anyone having a problem with that.
Miller is not in 3rd grade anymore, and Nazis do not have rights afforded to regular folk. Plus, the school's administration has been protecting poor wittle Miller since he was her student. The principal whited out the bad part of the teacher's report so Miller's parents wouldn't be upset.
dsc
(52,162 posts)He wasn't 8 years old at Wharton.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)But something is going on with the school's administration as well. Whiting out sections so the parents are not upset sounds like privilege to me. I also want to know if they said anything to the teacher all those years ago.
dsc
(52,162 posts)The professor offered an opinion (unflattering to be sure but an opinion nonetheless). For that reason I have some less of a problem but it still is somewhat of a problem in that he was a professor and presumedly not authorized to speak on behalf of Wharton.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I don't see the problem once you've grown up.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Like I wrote above, it speaks to one thing: Privilege.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)Blecht
(3,803 posts)And yes, what the teacher did violates it.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)No idea why people cant get this right.
phylny
(8,380 posts)I know what they're referring to.
Ms. Toad
(34,074 posts)KayF
(1,345 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)HIPPA deals with health privacy. FERPA is The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act that prohibits unauthorized disclosure of information about students by educational institutions receiving federal funds.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)You apparently dont know the right title either.
Two As and one P. Really not that hard. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)I thought you were saying HIPPA/HIPAA applied, not that you were correcting their spelling. I understand your inclination to spell check, but your snark about it toward anyone who chooses to spell the shorthand as it sounds to them isn't necessary.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Ill remember that when I see one of your replies
malaise
(269,026 posts)Wyatt513
(22 posts)This is getting silly and not what we want to project.
WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)Suspension is too harsh.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)OMG, Men are being attacked from all directions
It must be, THE WAR AGAINST MEN
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,355 posts)about what some of them know about me.
meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)He ate dried glue off his hand. How is that such a privacy violation?
Now had she told us he killed birds on the playground or tried to stab a kid with a pencil, that might be different because that would show a disturbed behavior and would have been investigated by school counselors and the principal. That is a privacy matter.
I don't see how this any privacy violation. What if the teacher recounted him helping a little girl get up after tripping and falling. Would that be a privacy violation? Both are observations witnessed by the teacher. One is embarrassing one is complimentary. So why is one a violation and not the other?
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,355 posts)meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)This teacher is out of line.
treestar
(82,383 posts)A lot of teachers say people will expect to be remembered and they can't as they had so many students over the years.
If you become a public figure, and the teacher remembers you (because you were really weird) at that point, when you are an adult, then I don't see a real problem.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Mr. Big This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kaleva
(36,307 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)I remember kids who did that. I felt sorry for them.
But I know at least one now who is a perfectly upstanding citizen. And a Democrat lol.
Funny thing, I remember only boys ate glue, no girls. Go figure.
Kaleva
(36,307 posts)ck4829
(35,077 posts)And thus, a racist was born.
KayF
(1,345 posts)he is only a senior adviser to the President of the United States. He must be protected from "bullying" from a public school teacher.
jamesho
(1 post)Stephen Miller is the grandson of Jews who escaped WWII and immigrated to the US. Yet he''s all about closed border. He is a little sociopath and deserves all scorn and ridicule.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Miller_(political_advisor)
virgogal
(10,178 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Welcome to DU, jamesho.
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)Gothmog
(145,291 posts)Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)Airplane glue was the product he preferred, when he was feeling peckish.