Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,104 posts)
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 07:21 PM Oct 2018

Which message would be preferable?

A message that continues to divide our country?

Or a message that tries to unite our country?

Do Democrats need to fight back with the same tactics and language used by the Republicans?

Or do they need to present a message that seeks to bring our country together and to unite our people for a common goal?

Can Democrats not do both?

Hit them hard when called for, but strive to contrast and to have a positive message?

Aren't we a better country than what is presently promoted by the Republicans?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which message would be preferable? (Original Post) kentuck Oct 2018 OP
I agree. saidsimplesimon Oct 2018 #1
Do both! DonaldsRump Oct 2018 #2
We are not going to unite the country before the next election. We should not be trying Squinch Oct 2018 #3
Agreed. Short term and long term. maxsolomon Oct 2018 #4
We cannot unite the country. Buddha said the three things that prevent enlightenment to happen wasupaloopa Oct 2018 #5
Never is a long time, but it might take them eons WhiteTara Oct 2018 #6

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)
1. I agree.
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 07:37 PM
Oct 2018

We can do both, with or without the noise machine amplified by media messaging. "both sides do it".

The message does not require any political framing. Americans are better than this and created a Republic that respected the concept of "out of many, we became one"

Quote by Virgil: “E pluribus unum - Out of many , one .” (stolen from the net)

DonaldsRump

(7,715 posts)
2. Do both!
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 07:37 PM
Oct 2018

Take the high road and kick the sh*t out of them in every legal and ethical way while doing it.

This is the ONLY way to deal with bullies.

Squinch

(50,956 posts)
3. We are not going to unite the country before the next election. We should not be trying
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 07:37 PM
Oct 2018

to. Our only job right now is to get them out.

In answer to your question, no we can't do both.

The message we use now should have only one purpose: to get votes from Democrats and Independents and to bring out those who often do not vote and induce them to vote for us.

maxsolomon

(33,345 posts)
4. Agreed. Short term and long term.
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 07:43 PM
Oct 2018

Long term, we need to enlighten 2 groups:

1. Non-voters
2. White people

Not all of them, just a small additional percentage.

 

wasupaloopa

(4,516 posts)
5. We cannot unite the country. Buddha said the three things that prevent enlightenment to happen
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 08:44 PM
Oct 2018

to a person are greed, hate and delusion. The three things leading to enlightenment are generosity, empathy and knowledge.

They are not on a path to enlightenment. Many of us are. We need to be on the same path to unite.

They will never change neither will we.

WhiteTara

(29,718 posts)
6. Never is a long time, but it might take them eons
Tue Oct 9, 2018, 09:16 PM
Oct 2018

and we don't have that kind of time to save the planet. Boy, who knew that we would all have to try and find our inner superwo/man cape and drive back the forces of darkness?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Which message would be pr...