'New NAFTA' is full of old policies that wreaked havoc on American farmers
This new deal is an especially great victory for our farmers,” President Trump said of the proposed amendments to NAFTA. His administration is rebranding the deal as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA. But, no matter how hard he may try, the president can’t rebrand the actions and sentiments at the heart of his “deal,” which continues his legacy of caring more about the appearance of success than about actually aiding the voters who got him elected.
Announcing the deal at a Rose Garden ceremony, Trump was flanked by Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin (former hedge fund manager) and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer (former corporate lawyer). That was entirely appropriate since “USMCA” is an agreement drafted with huge corporate agribusinesses — not farmers — in mind. And this latest handout to corporations not only undermines independent agriculture, but puts your family in harm’s way too.
Absent from the deal is any effort to restore transparent labeling on meat products. That’s despite the fact that my organization, Public Justice, ranchers across America, and even Fox News all begged the administration to use the NAFTA negotiations to fulfill its earlier promise to restore country-of-origin labeling. These labels — which existed for years — identify where meat was born, raised, and slaughtered. They provide consumers information they desire, and correspondingly increase the income of domestic producers who make the products U.S. consumers prefer.
Canada and Mexico challenged the labels before the WTO, and Congress removed the requirements to avoid retaliatory tariffs (a cruel irony given our current trade policies). Thus, a NAFTA renegotiation was the perfect opportunity to restore this policy that Congress, consumers, and farmers all support. Yet, embodying the style over substance standard that defines this administration, the revisions to NAFTA only change the headings of the sections, reproducing the exact same rules.
Where the Trump administration could have increased ranchers’ competitive position and aided consumers, it instead only secured the tools that would allow it to disingenuously claim action where, in fact, there was none.
The sole true “concession” Trump secured for ranchers is one the North American Meat Institute praises because it enables nearly complete integration. Translation: It allows a select few corporations that already control our meat supply to further solidify their lock on the industry at the expense of farmers. Worse still, it actively endangers the American public.
https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/410595-new-nafta-is-full-of-old-policies-that-wreaked-havoc-on-american
= new reply since forum marked as read
Yo Mama I know you didn't write this, it's posted on the OP article.
The past tense of wreak is "wrought," it's one of those crazy irregular verbs that everyone avoids.
It's the proofreader in me, even though I'm retired now. I just can't help myself. Sorry!
