General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe don't have good framing on the abortion issue IMHO
We don't want abortions either.
We advocate for.more robust and comprehensive sex education at an early age.
We advocate for access to birth control.
We view these as lessening the chance of an unwanted pregnancy, which is a fact.
Instead we focus on "choice" which gives the other side ammunition to say we are "pro-abortion".
I think our motto should be "pro-prevention" but it's too late for that I'm afraid.
Don't misunderstand me. I totally favor a women's right to choose her own medical decisions.
ck4829
(35,077 posts)Could talk about how fiscal conservatives are against abortion because it means cheap labor for the jobs that automation dont replace and driving down wages in general.
Could talk about how right wing evangelicals are against abortion because they get cannon fodder for their nuclear war "clash of civilizations" against the Muslims and/or to die against Gog and Magog so the "end times" can start.
But that would be... going low.
niyad
(113,421 posts)ck4829
(35,077 posts)gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)MiniMe
(21,718 posts)I am not Pro-Abortion either, I don't think anybody is. However, I do believe that it is the woman's choice to make up her mind about what she wants to do with her body.
JenniferJuniper
(4,512 posts)if that's what the pregnant woman wants. It's not my business, your business, and it's certainly not the government's business.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)I support sex education, birth control and access to abortions. If we spent more time on education and funding in providing birth control (both male and female) education we could reduce the necessity for abortion. Of course, there are those who consider women chattel and women who bow to their masters.
I like your framing "pro-prevention" of abortions. It's not too late, thank you.
Johnny2X2X
(19,074 posts)But that shouldn't be the messaging.
This is a women's health issue. Do we want the government to tell women what they can do with their bodies or do we trust the individual to decide for their self?
For the record, I think abortion should be easily accessible and free to all women who want them. I am pro abortion, more abortion is better for our society. And it makes women more free.
TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
These fiscal conservatives will freak when the bill comes in. If 10K extra births occur in a state, each year, for 18 years, you're looking at an increase to state and local budgets of over $3 Billion per year! You have things such as medical, food, housing, tax deductions and most expensive of all, education & school transportation.
Right now, there is a near equilibrium between birth and death rates, keeping taxes flat. Births are relatively flat.
The elimination of abortion services will cause a massive spike in birth rates in each state, and that will decimate state budgets in a couple of decades. I believe Rick Perry cut back abortion in Texas for less than a year and that led to over 7K extra births, and he backed off on those restrictions--because it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize where that was going. We're talking Gov. Oops realized it... so it has to be pretty obvious.
Now: Add it the cost of foster care and stipends and you will see this spike closer to $25K or more per year.
I'll give you a classic Teabagger response to what I am describing:
I moved back to my hometown with four kids. A local teabagger, who drives around with RW radio blaring in his car, came up to me and started to give me shit for raising his taxes by moving four kids into our development, since it will drive up education costs for the town. Mind you, I never met this fucker before, and he just came up to me to give me shit about living.
Besides how the "Pro-Life" position distorts much of the Bible, which can't be successfully argued with fundamenalists who use it as a wedge issue to keep their congregation and donation coffers flowing, God kills scores of pregnant women, babies and children all the time. While holy rollers claim that God has a plan for pre-borns, and knows their names and futures, it is ridiculous to think that abortion isn't also part of God's plan. Yet, when the US flies in and bombs residential homes and hospitals, that's part of God's plan.
.
Squinch
(50,956 posts)disciplined about messaging.
We have the truth on our side.
PS: I'm totally pro abortion. I know what life is like before abortion was legal. Splitting hairs on whether one is pro abortion is like splitting hairs on whether one is pro open heart surgery. It's dopey.
JudyM
(29,251 posts)ProfessorPlum
(11,257 posts)but the better phrase is "bodily autonomy". The idea that no one can be forced to give up an organ, even if that organ could save another's life.
phylny
(8,381 posts)Perhaps I didn't state my idea properly.
ProfessorPlum
(11,257 posts)But just say, "if you were a donor match for someone who needed a kidney to save their life, should you be _forced_ to give them a kidney? No? Then you support a woman's right to choose to either remain pregnant or not".
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)But the nuts who do drive people to the polls.
CrispyQ
(36,482 posts)I think there are two kinds of anti-abortion people. Those who want to control women, & those who put the rights of a clump of cells over the rights of a living breathing woman. The first group could care less about unwanted pregnancy & would actually use it as a means of control, & a good number of the second group believe that birth control is a form of abortion.
We are not going to sway these people. We need to engage the non-voters & young women. Use the 13th Amendment as the argument for choice. Forcing women to carry a pregnancy to term is the same as making her a slave to the fetus & violates her 13th Amendment rights.
2010
Forced Labor, Revisited: The Thirteenth
Amendment and Abortion
Andrew Koppelman
Northwestern University School of Law, akoppelman@law.northwestern.edu
I. The basic argument
The Thirteenth Amendment reads as follows:
1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
My claim is that the amendment is violated by laws that prohibit abortion. When women are compelled to carry and bear children, they are subjected to "involuntary servitude" in violation of the amendment. Abortion prohibitions violate the Amendment's guarantee of personal liberty, because forced pregnancy and childbirth, by compelling the woman to serve the fetus, creates "that control by which the personal service of one man [sic] is disposed of or coerced for another's benefit which is the essence of involuntary servitude."6
Such laws violate the amendment's guarantee of equality, because forcing women to be mothers makes them into a servant caste, a group which, by virtue of a status of birth, is held subject to a special duty to serve others and not themselves.
WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)affordable abortions." No apologies. No making it out to be something else. A woman's right to choose is just that, a right.
In the new poll 67 percent of those surveyed said the 1973 Supreme Court decision should stand.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/most-americans-want-roe-v-wade-stand-survey-shows-n887751
We are being beat by congressional redistricting, an uneven playing field, and passionate activism. Land owners have more of a say in the process than anyone. That includes sparsely populated areas of land that give smaller groups of people just as strong of a voice.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)and forget moronic pro-life nonsense.
TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
The people with money will always find the means to get an abortion.
They will drive the country down, by cuts to social and education programs, creating a serf class.
That expanding serf class with exacerbate their minority status and lead to their political downfall.
.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Given we are 10 years away from irreversible climate change, I am 100 percent in the population reduction camp. I think we should offer $$$ to men and women who do not have children. If birth control fails for anyone, then easily accessible and safe abortion should be there for them.
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)We want to prevent abortions; Republicans want to punish women for being female. Enuf said.
peggysue2
(10,835 posts)pro-choice to pro-abortion. Why would anyone expect them to accept pro-prevention, particularly when many of these same people are against contraception?
It's the changing of the narrative, rebranding it to their own advantage that's the problem. Pro-choice is a perfectly good position for all the reasons you mentioned. And the stance on abortion itself? We are SLR's
Safe
Legal and
Rare
It's not even the concept of abortion that drives the political edge of the movement. It's the idea that women should be in charge of their own reproductive destiny that drives the right-wing batshit crazy.
So no, I wouldn't favor the change in branding; that only gives the crazies another win. We embrace the idea of pro-choice because it's right and humane.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)Or we could go Monty Python.
lindysalsagal
(20,694 posts)Love that man. Miss that man.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)Response to SHRED (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
treestar
(82,383 posts)that they are not pro-life, they are anti-choice. They do not care about the fetuses, but the control of women.
Caliman73
(11,740 posts)When we cede to the idea that abortions are some kind of horrible thing, then we have already lost the argument.
We do want to reduce the need for abortion by providing contraception, and good sex education to boys, girls, men, and women. We want to reduce the stigma of the use of contraception and of accessing abortion services when needed.
We want to reduce abortions because preventing unintended and unwanted pregnancies is easier and better than having a medical procedure to terminate the pregnancy. Less cost and less danger for the mother. However, it should ALWAYS be an option for when those other strategies fail.
We cannot be squeamish about being pro-abortion.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)And pro-prevention.
And pro-education.
All of it.
You're suggesting I frame it as though I'm anti-abortion, which I'm not.
diva77
(7,646 posts)they oppose all of the social safety net items required for a healthy fetus to grow - health care, education, environmental, & FDA regulation, and much much more
DFW
(54,414 posts)He's only running for State Auditor, but in Iowa, it's a bigger deal than in many states. He counters the anti-choice bible thumpers with selected bible quotes that support choice. He said it has worked for him when confronted by anti-choice people who are otherwise sympathetic to him, and the State Auditor of Iowa has just about zero to do with abortion anyway (that's how fanatic Republicans are in his neck of the woods, or, rather, cornfields, in his case).
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)to countering these fundie nuts is positively "Fugelsangian"!
BTW, the signature quote you're displaying is something I've heard JF express or paraphrase regularly on his show.
DFW
(54,414 posts)The André Gide quote is one I've been using for over 15 years. The original is in French. I don't live in the USA, and have never heard JF'S show. How long has he been using it? Maybe he got it from me?
delisen
(6,044 posts)Funtatlaguy
(10,881 posts)Thats a lot of dead women and doctors. Or a lot in prison for life.
hurl
(938 posts)No apologies
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)It's not framing for the sake of political gain that will resonate. It is the sincere appreciation for Democratic moral values, including a woman's right to be free from male domination, not a religious, so named, moral stance on abortion.
Retrograde
(10,137 posts)I am Pro-Life. I believe all women have the right to control their own reproductive health. I believe women have the right to chose to have an abortion if they wish, and it's none of my business why. I believe all women have the right to safe and affordable means of birth control.
I believe that all women have the right to pre-natal care to ensure the health of them and their children. I believe all women and their children have the right to regular medical care, as well as access to clean air and water. I believe all women and their children have the right to an education. I believe all women and their children have the right to a decent living. I believe all women and their children have a right to a peaceful life devoid of wars fought to enrich the elite.
I do not believe that concern for a child ends at birth.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,360 posts)Deb
(3,742 posts)The GOP makes money off MY crotch. All women need to understand that about themselves.
Until the gravy train stops, we will have a struggle.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)So called Christians are not supposed to FORNICATE outside of marriage. They're not supposed to use any device or other means to disrupt pregnancy. If they are Christians as they allege then this is a nonissue.
And we still have separation of Church and state.
Ms. Toad
(34,076 posts)the countdown until someone else says we are, too, pro-abortion.
Without having looked, I'll bet it's within the first 5 posts.
ETA: Nailed it. Post 4.
shanny
(6,709 posts)and that is precisely the problem
kcr
(15,317 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,995 posts)I want abortions to be a personal medical decision. This include the idea that I can decide whether or not to be pregnant.
Weve tried other framing. It didnt work either. Those asshole dont care about wonens rights
Vinca
(50,285 posts)Women don't tell men when to get a vasectomy or when they must get a prostate exam. They have control over their own bodies and women should have control over theirs. Old, white, male politicians have no business playing doctor . . . and neither do old, white, male judges.
Mosby
(16,320 posts)Is pointing out that the government has no business insinuating itself between a doctor and their patients.
Passing laws about reproductive health is a form of nanny-statism.
This approach appeals to their libertarian sides.
David__77
(23,423 posts)I am glad that medical and surgical abortion exist to offer women additional options.
wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)Anyone who thinks she should bear her rapist's child should go to hell.
That's how you frame it, make these shitlords defend the indefensible in polite public.
Anyways, 79% of the public support abortion rights, so these forced birthers are in the clear minority.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,371 posts)Cha
(297,339 posts)Pro Choice. "Abortion" shouldn't even be mentioned. I cringe when I see that.
Yes, "pro-prevention" is descriptive of Planned Parenthood.
Nobody does want abortions but it should be the woman's right to choose.
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)Not your body - not your business.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)should be imprisoned for the "crime" of abortion - the woman, the doctor, the man who impregnated the woman, or some combination of the above.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)KCDebbie
(664 posts)They say: Sex education encourages young people to have sex.
We say: There should be access to oral contraceptives and condoms.
They say: Access to oral contraceptives encourages young people to have sex.
We say: All women should have access to legal and safe abortions.
They say: Access to legal and safe abortions encourages young people to have sex.
They're terrified that somehow, somewhere a young person, or anyone for that matter, is having sex recreationally and ENJOYING it...
shanny
(6,709 posts)is falling into the R framing. If you say we don't want abortions, you are saying they are bad...and they are NOT. They are medical procedures, which are neutral at most. They prevent additional trauma when there is incest or rape involved. They allow women to live the lives they choose. Most of all they are about equal rights for women, to decide on their own and on their own terms whether they want a child, or not.
Excuse me, but it has FUCK ALL to do with what ANY man wants. When men can get pregnant, they can have a say. When pregnancies can be sustained and brought to term without the involvement of a woman's body, they can have a say. Until then they can shut the fuck up and sit the fuck down.
I am pro-abortion.
p.s. a commenter on the teevee made the point the other day that she does not believe life begins at conception and "why would you want the government telling people what they should believe?" Shut the sanctimonious rw prick right up. Priceless!
calimary
(81,335 posts)There's "you can CHOOSE ... NOT to have an abortion. That's what being pro-choice is all about."
But I like to rattle cages sometimes.
Ahhh... pro-"life."
Well, you CAN'T really be pro-"life" if you like cutting all those programs that support poor women and children.
You CAN'T say you're pro-"life" if you don't believe there's a climate crisis.
You CAN'T say you're pro-"life" if you're pro DEATH penalty.
You CAN'T say you're pro-"life" if you're okay with unlimited access to guns.
You CAN'T say you're pro-"life" if you hate the Affordable Care Act, and love the politicians who want to do away with it.
You CAN'T say you're pro-"life" if you think environmental protections aren't necessary. A healthy eco-system protects YOUR life!
You CAN'T say you're pro-"life" if you hate immigrants, many of whom are trying to save their own lives by fleeing to this country to escape the barbarism in theirs.
You CAN'T say you're pro-"life" if you only care about the developing embryo and stop caring for the baby the moment it's born.
You CAN'T say you're pro-"life" if you begrudge the elderly the Social Security checks they've EARNED after decades of work.
You CAN'T say you're pro-"life" if you want Planned Parenthood closed down. Know what they mainly do? Provide HEALTH CARE to women who can't afford it. Pap smears, mammograms, and other LIFE-EXTENDING health maintenance services. Did I say LIFE-EXTENDING?
And I'm sure I'll think of more...
Hekate
(90,723 posts)I am 71 and am so godsdam sick of the fight about abortion. Abortions are part of the Full Range of Women's Health Care.
Look at it this way: I get Pap tests -- that is part of the Full Range. So far so good, but if something dubious shows up, that's part of the Full Range. I get mammograms -- ditto. I used to used contraception -- ditto. I got pregnant, I used prenatal and postnatal care, and I used an obstetrician. Part of the Full Range.
Not every woman uses all of the Full Range, but it needs to be there for all of us in order for it to work.
Abortion is no different. Legal or illegal, an amazing number of women have abortions in their lifetimes. It is a common and necessary procedure. Stop apologizing for it, stop fighting about it, stop trying to explain it to those who will never change their minds -- just tell the naysayers it is part of the Full Range of Women's Health Care, period, full stop, and that you support all of it.
JI7
(89,253 posts)JI7
(89,253 posts)they framed it so they called themselves prolife . and i get so frustrated when i hear prochoice people refer to them as pro life also. call them anti choice.
EleanorR
(2,393 posts)My body, my choice.
Access to birth control is not something right wingers want for women, and they never have.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)The framing that needs to change is how we talk about Republicans. Democrats need to get much more blunt about who Republicans are and what they're attempting to do. Fuck diplomacy. This is war.
Olafjoy
(937 posts)1. If person says they are pro-life, I make sure they are as adamantly anti-death penalty. If they are in favor of the death penalty they cannot argue about life. Thou Shalt not Kill. They need to be supporting anti-death penalty candidates as fervently as anti-abortion candidates.
2. If life begins at conception and embryo and fetus are people, why is your 1st birthday not 3 months after you are born? Also, if a fertility clinic was on fire and there was a substantial chance of the roof caving in and killing firefighters, do you send them in to rescue the people anyway?
3. When abortion is illegal, women do not stop having abortions. They have unclean and unsafe
abortions and thousands and thousands of women die. Why are their lives not important to you?
4. If you are going to regulate birth control, will you agree to the stipulation that no man will be prescribed Viagra, Levitra, and Cialis unless his wife comes to the appointment with him and testifies that it will only be used for intercourse within the marriage?
5. If you are going to pass laws regulating a womans body, would you support a law on mens bodies that makes it illegal for a man to engage in sex if it not for procreation? If it is OK to regulate female autonomy, it is equally OK to regulate male autonomy?
onecaliberal
(32,866 posts)If you support any war or dropping any bombs anywhere near people, If you want to take away healthcare, food, affordable housing, jobs with a living wage, social security and Medicare then you are NOT pro life. You dont give two shits about actual life.
This issue is about one thing for pukes and that is controlling women. Full stop.