General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNo party? No more as (Florida) voters shift toward Democratic Party
No party? No more as voters shift toward Democratic PartyTampa Bay Times, 10/8/2018
But when Branam realized that independents can't vote in Florida's closed primaries and her voice would be limited to November, she became a Democrat.
Asked why, the 60-year-old grandmother and former hospital secretary didn't mince words. "I can't stand Trump," she said.
Tens of thousands of Florida voters have made the same change in recent months. What effect these party-switchers will have on the outcome will depend largely on turnout on Nov. 6, four weeks from Tuesday.
More
manor321
(3,344 posts)You want to have a say in our party? Do something very simple and register with the party.
DinahMoeHum
(21,812 posts)Fla Dem
(23,765 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)They are really internal party matters. They should be entirely run and paid for by parties. Having the government run them blurs the distinction between a political party and the government.
unc70
(6,121 posts)It varies a lot by state, but when primaries are publicly funded and supervised then states get to set the rules.
marylandblue
(12,344 posts)David__77
(23,520 posts)I tend to agree with you. I think perhaps parties should determine their own means to select how candidates get the party endorsement - whether through a vote of a committee or a party-run caucus/primary. Then that candidate will have become the "party candidate."
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)That's how it tends to be in the rest of the world. When I was a paid up member of the Liberal Democrats I got to vote on who would be the party representative for my local constituency in the 1997 UK General Election. Non paying members didn't get a say as to who the candidate would be. However mind it is far easier to become a candidate in a UK general election than it is to be a US House Congresscritter.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)The only time you have to make a distinction is for voting in the Primary. Then you have to vote for a single party's candidates - but the ballots are designed with one party's candidates listed down one side, and the other party's candidates listed down the other side.
So even when you pick up a ballot, no one knows which party you'll be voting for, that only happens in the privacy of the voting booth. The restriction is that you can only vote for the candidates on one side or the other - no mixing.
If a ballot has votes on both sides, it's thrown out as invalid. And we use only paper ballots, btw.
Gore1FL
(21,152 posts)When you show up to the polls you ask for the party ballot you want.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But the poll, by the Florida Southern College Center for Polling and Policy Research, has a roughly 4½-point margin of error, and Gillums lead is just over 3 points.
http://floridapolitics.com/archives/276887-florida-southern-college-poll-narrow-lead-for-andrew-gillum
lpbk2713
(42,766 posts)And a special thank you to our newly registered Puerto Rican friends.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)OnDoutside
(19,974 posts)pissed off that in Florida so much of his info is publicly available, including party affiliation.
appalachiablue
(41,177 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I'm hoping they decide to join the Blue Wave. I read somewhere that they are...not in FL, just generally.
7962
(11,841 posts)getting them OUT to vote is 1/2 the battle.
JI7
(89,276 posts)those who are really independent and could go either way are smaller.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)But I'm also guessing the Republican voting independents are libertarians, and the rest of the independents are moderates, or have one foot in each party. Like economically conservative but socially liberal, and on both counts are moderate about those things. In other words, they don't feel they totally belong to either party.
JI7
(89,276 posts)kerry, obama 2008, romney 2012 all won them. so you can see they winning them doesn't always mean winning the election either.